MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Skatastrophy on August 03, 2011, 08:26:40 AM

Title: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Skatastrophy on August 03, 2011, 08:26:40 AM
If you guys are hungry for recruiting news, I'll start posting stuff like this as I come across it.

http://www.nbebasketball.com/w3/2011-0803/class-of-2012-pf-visiting-wake-forest-today/


"Wake Forest, Temple and Marquette," were new schools of note that Thomas mentioned adding that, as of now, he is considering "Wake Forest, Maryland, Clemson, Temple, Marquette, Penn State, Virginia Tech and VCU."

Devin's ESPN profile, graded a 90:  http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/recruiting/player/_/id/141215/devin-thomas
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Litehouse on August 03, 2011, 10:05:14 AM
Skat, thanks for posting these.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: GGGG on August 03, 2011, 11:03:14 AM
It seems like, with the Ferguson commit and the Taylor transfer, that Buzz is really narrowing in on PF and C for the next class.  I counted 9 Rivals top 100 players with Marquette consideration, and only one is a guard (Dunn).  The rest are front line players, six of whom are 6'7" or taller.  And that doesn't include Auguste or Thomas who are outside the top 100.

It would be really nice if we could get one of these nice power forwards in 2012.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: MerrittsMustache on August 03, 2011, 11:19:10 AM
While I'd obviously love to see MU land a Sullinger-type dominant big man, I'm not going to be disappointed if they end up signing a 2- or 3-star big who can basically be a rich man's Dwight Burke for a few seasons. A guy who can rebound, defend and screen would definitely have a lot of value on this team.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: jmayer1 on August 03, 2011, 12:21:27 PM
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on August 03, 2011, 11:19:10 AM
While I'd obviously love to see MU land a Sullinger-type dominant big man, I'm not going to be disappointed if they end up signing a 2- or 3-star big who can basically be a rich man's Dwight Burke for a few seasons. A guy who can rebound, defend and screen would definitely have a lot of value on this team.


Agreed, I'd take a Marcus Jackson type at the 4. Scoring doesn't seem to be MU's problem under Buzz, rebounding and defense do, somewhat.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: muhs03 on August 03, 2011, 12:31:56 PM
One name that was on Buzz's radar quite some time ago was Jerami Grant. Havent heard much about him. Im guessing we are out of it? Love that kid's pedigree.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: avid1010 on August 03, 2011, 01:45:26 PM
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on August 03, 2011, 11:19:10 AM
While I'd obviously love to see MU land a Sullinger-type dominant big man, I'm not going to be disappointed if they end up signing a 2- or 3-star big who can basically be a rich man's Dwight Burke for a few seasons. A guy who can rebound, defend and screen would definitely have a lot of value on this team.

Its impossible to say just how hard it is to find diamonds in the rough when it comes to big men...but I love what Buzz did with finding Gardner, and I would hope we wouldn't have to settle for anything less than Gardner/Otule types of big men.  I do believe that if he can develop those players, we will soon be able to land higher rated big men. 
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: BubbaWilliams on August 03, 2011, 03:20:13 PM
We seriously need rebounding.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: PBRme on August 03, 2011, 05:09:33 PM
Quote from: BRMU23 on August 03, 2011, 03:20:13 PM
We seriously need rebounding.

+1

And scoring, defense, and coaching
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Blackhat on August 03, 2011, 09:18:33 PM
We've needed more rebounding since cross eyed "shades" deane was roaming the sidelines.

Don't even need to say it anymore...just assume.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: bamamarquettefan on August 03, 2011, 11:22:47 PM
Quote from: BRMU23 on August 03, 2011, 03:20:13 PM
We seriously need rebounding.
Of course we always want more rebounding, but we outrebounded even our big east opponents last year.  We grabbed 35.3 percent of our misses in conference play, and only allowed 34.3 percent to our opponents in conference play. Not a huge edge, but above average in a great conference after having been pummeled for several years is a great step forward.

And we didn't lose that much rebounding except for fulce when he was in.  Crowder was nationally ranked in both offensive and defensive rebound (butler was not), otule was ranked in offensive rebounding, and Gardner would have been in the top 50 in the country in offensive rebounding if he had enough minutes.

Blue was out top rebounding guard.  I'd live a great cents or pf recruit, but we are holding our own on the boards already.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on August 04, 2011, 06:59:59 AM
PBRme: really?? We need more scoring? What team have you been watching the last 3 years? These are some of the best offensive teams in MU history.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: MUMac on August 04, 2011, 07:35:19 AM
Quote from: Jamailman on August 04, 2011, 06:59:59 AM
PBRme: really?? We need more scoring? What team have you been watching the last 3 years? These are some of the best offensive teams in MU history.

The teal must have passed right by ... If you looked at all of the segments he listed, that pretty well sums up all of basketball, no?  Frankly, I thought the teal was overkill, but with your response, I guess not.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Skatastrophy on August 04, 2011, 08:57:32 AM
Quote from: MUMac on August 04, 2011, 07:35:19 AM
The teal must have passed right by ... If you looked at all of the segments he listed, that pretty well sums up all of basketball, no?  Frankly, I thought the teal was overkill, but with your response, I guess not.

On Jamailman's post you can see the icon of a cell-phone (next to the title).  On some cellphones the teal doesn't show up for some reason.  Some trolls have been harping on our defense and coaching, so if there were no teal I could see taking it seriously and jumping down a guy's throat about the scoring comment :)  /2cents
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on August 04, 2011, 09:04:14 AM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on August 04, 2011, 08:57:32 AM
On Jamailman's post you can see the icon of a cell-phone (next to the title).  On some cellphones the teal doesn't show up for some reason.  Some trolls have been harping on our defense and coaching, so if there were no teal I could see taking it seriously and jumping down a guy's throat about the scoring comment :)  /2cents

You're right.  My fault.  I usually don't need teal, but I didn't see it on my phone.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: MUMac on August 04, 2011, 01:42:19 PM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on August 04, 2011, 08:57:32 AM
On Jamailman's post you can see the icon of a cell-phone (next to the title).  On some cellphones the teal doesn't show up for some reason.  Some trolls have been harping on our defense and coaching, so if there were no teal I could see taking it seriously and jumping down a guy's throat about the scoring comment :)  /2cents

I was just having some fun with Jamailman.  As I stated, though, teal wasn't necessary because out of rebounding, offense, defense and scoring, what else is there?   ;)
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: seakm4 on August 06, 2011, 02:49:04 AM
give the kid a baseline jumper and he sounds like Fulce.  I loved his game and heart and wish all kids had his kind of passion for the game.
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: bilsu on August 06, 2011, 08:10:05 AM
Quote from: seakm4 on August 06, 2011, 02:49:04 AM
give the kid a baseline jumper and he sounds like Fulce.  I loved his game and heart and wish all kids had his kind of passion for the game.
and good knees
Title: Re: 2012 PF: Devin Thomas
Post by: brewcity77 on August 06, 2011, 10:17:49 AM
Quote from: bilsu on August 06, 2011, 08:10:05 AMand good knees

Agreed ;D

I have wondered quite a few times what might have been if Fulce had been healthy. According to players and guys on the training staff, he was the most athletic guy on the team from the moment he arrived, including the Big 3, Lazar, and Jimmy. Had he had his health, I wonder if we would have had two guys drafted into the league this year. Fulce's work ethic and passion was never a problem, he just didn't develop as well as he might have due to all those injuries. Really too bad for him, the guy was the definition of a Warrior.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev