MUScoop

Should HH32 and Masterr get a ban for betting their testicles MU would lose?

That's just bad form.  I'm just talking a short read-only ban.  I mean, if you're going to bet that kind of thing you should have some punishment if you lose - no?

See thread...
http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=25401.msg282906#msg282906

Either a ban or verification that one/both of their testicles are gone.

Someone get em a donut pillow to sit on for a while.

Quote from: MU PoopScoop on March 09, 2011, 10:37:55 PM
Either a ban or verification that one/both of their testicles are gone.

+1

Show us the testicle(s)!

No ban, but they need to give up the testicles for a week.

I am sure the procedure can be the same on humans.


Neutering your male
4 comments | leave your own comment

Neutering sterilizes a male dog so he's incapable of parenting puppies. Many, many wonderful health and behavioral effects occur because he's undergone "the big snip."

It's a simple surgery, far more so than a spay. Under anesthesia, an incision is made in front of the scrotum, and then the testicles are removed through that incision. The stalks of the testicles are cut. Sometimes the incision needs stitches.

Benefits

The benefits to your dog--aside from his not siring unwanted puppies--are considerable:

He's less likely to get certain diseases, such as testicular cancer and most prostate diseases.
He will be calmer with less testosterone in his system, and thus you'll be calmer too.
He'll mark less, inside and out, since he has less incentive to announce his presence.
The lower level of testosterone can improve if not eliminate roaming, aggression, humping, and other dominance-related behaviors. (He still might want to hump, but mounting after neutering has more to do with dominance than sex. He can still show interest in females in heat or hump your knee.)
In the case of senior dogs, neutering reduces the size of an enlarged prostate.
The health and behavioral benefits occur whether your boy is a wee puppy or distinguished senior citizen.

There's a new menu item at Porcinis...

Who's the 3rd person that voted no???

Accountability has to start somewhere.

I call foul.  Easy to bet your testicles when you don't have any to begin with.   ;)

Quote from: willie warrior on March 09, 2011, 10:41:31 PM
No ban, but they need to give up the testicles for a week.

Eh, not a big deal, I don't suspect that they use them all that often.

Quote from: T-Bone on March 09, 2011, 10:43:40 PM
Who's the 3rd person that voted no???

Lance's other nut

Quote from: ZiggysF*ckinFryBoy on March 09, 2011, 11:14:07 PM
Lance's other nut

AND OOOOOONNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

/JFB goes to the line

At the very least tack their dumb ass post to the top of the board like a scarlet letter.  Public shaming is certainly called for.  Morons.

It's great to see that JC has larger testicles than them and he actually puts them on the line!

I voted yes but since i removed them please reconsider


especially note the fact the 2 games i lost my cool this year were Uconn and WVU


call it good luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!