MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: NavinRJohnson on March 09, 2011, 08:44:07 AM

Title: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: NavinRJohnson on March 09, 2011, 08:44:07 AM
If Georgetown gets beat today, is it possible if not likely that MU ends up with a better seed than they do? The overall body of work would say no, but that overall body of work included Chris Wright, and they frankly have stunk since he's been gone. I know they are maintaining their claim that he may be back for the tournament, but if they seed the team that will play in the tournament, they are likley to get hammered because of his absence, no?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: willie warrior on March 09, 2011, 08:48:19 AM
Would also likely depend on what we do tonight for a dance seed compared to Georgetown. They would likely still get a higher seed becuase of RPI/Poll Ranking.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Lighthouse 84 on March 09, 2011, 11:48:13 AM
Gtown's getting a beatdown in the first half.....a Warrior win tonight could go a long way.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 09, 2011, 11:58:05 AM
Georgetown is a bit like MU when James went down.  Kind of tough to really tell how good they are without Wright because they've played nothing but excellent teams.  They may have still lost those games, but not nearly as badly.  I hope he gets back healthy in time for the NCAA's, it sucks to see a senior star go down like that.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: NersEllenson on March 09, 2011, 12:15:48 PM
If MU beats WVU tonight - any merit to the idea of MU getting a higher seed than WVU?  WVU currently 17 on S-Curve...but if MU goes 2-0 against the Mountaineers for the season...??
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: bilsu on March 09, 2011, 12:18:24 PM
Georgetown without Wright does not deserve a bid. The commitee may or may not take that into account. I still thin the commitee will be looking hard at each team before they give the Big East 11 bids. Georgetown, Villanova and MU will be scrutinized heavily.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: mug644 on March 09, 2011, 12:51:48 PM
I'm guessing that the seeding of the BEast teams--especially if 11 get in, as currently expected by most folks--it likely to be odd, and perhaps inconsistent and frustrating to some teams. With the committee's aim to have conference matchups avoided, and the need to deal with site limitations, I think they'll need to shift a few teams up or down to make things work.

Now, if G'town loses today, with Villanova already out, MU could play themselves into the good side of those adjustments by winning tonight (and beyond). Overall, though, I think that trying to predict seeding will be more difficult this year than ever before, due to loads of BEast teams, the 69 team tournament, and the weak bubble.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TJ on March 09, 2011, 01:07:32 PM
Quote from: mug644 on March 09, 2011, 12:51:48 PM
I'm guessing that the seeding of the BEast teams--especially if 11 get in, as currently expected by most folks--it likely to be odd, and perhaps inconsistent and frustrating to some teams. With the committee's aim to have conference matchups avoided, and the need to deal with site limitations, I think they'll need to shift a few teams up or down to make things work.

Now, if G'town loses today, with Villanova already out, MU could play themselves into the good side of those adjustments by winning tonight (and beyond). Overall, though, I think that trying to predict seeding will be more difficult this year than ever before, due to loads of BEast teams, the 69 team tournament, and the weak bubble.
With everything that's gone on this year, I'll be happy with any seed at all.  I would prefer to be one of the 60 teams with a first round bye, but I don't want to be greedy.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: mug644 on March 09, 2011, 01:13:11 PM
Quote from: TJ on March 09, 2011, 01:07:32 PM
With everything that's gone on this year, I'll be happy with any seed at all.  I would prefer to be one of the 60 teams with a first round bye, but I don't want to be greedy.

I'm the same way. And, despite knowing that my words won't stop it, I think the banter about possible seeding is even more speculative this year than ever.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 09, 2011, 01:32:02 PM
Tim Higgins and Jim Burr part of the crew reffing the St. John's/Rutgers match-up. How many crews work the 4 games today? 4? 2? 1?

I would HATE to have those two for our game... *shudder*
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 09, 2011, 01:33:20 PM
Quote from: bilsu on March 09, 2011, 12:18:24 PM
Georgetown without Wright does not deserve a bid. The commitee may or may not take that into account. I still thin the commitee will be looking hard at each team before they give the Big East 11 bids. Georgetown, Villanova and MU will be scrutinized heavily.

And I've thought all along that was the reason Gtown has consistently said "we think Wright will be able to go for the NCAA" - they'll get a bid if it's possible he'll play, but not if he's done for the year.  So, just say it's possible, an they're in (which they will be...).  But likely Wright will not be able to play.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Henry Sugar on March 09, 2011, 01:40:18 PM
Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 09, 2011, 01:33:20 PM
And I've thought all along that was the reason Gtown Marquette has consistently said "we think Wright McNeal will be able to go for the NCAA" - they'll get a bid if it's possible he'll play, but not if he's done for the year.  So, just say it's possible, an they're in (which they will be...).  But likely Wright will not be able to play.

2007'd
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 09, 2011, 01:42:46 PM
Quote from: Henry Sugar on March 09, 2011, 01:40:18 PM
2007'd

Hah.  Yes.  BTW...did I miss it, how was our D last night (by the numbers, of course...)?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: marquette09 on March 09, 2011, 01:52:38 PM
Quote from: socrplar125 on March 09, 2011, 01:32:02 PM
Tim Higgins and Jim Burr part of the crew reffing the St. John's/Rutgers match-up. How many crews work the 4 games today? 4? 2? 1?

I would HATE to have those two for our game... *shudder*

I think its more entertaining to watch Higgins run than to watch the game itself
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Henry Sugar on March 09, 2011, 01:57:04 PM
D was pretty good last night.  Only allowed 0.90 ppp and 45% on eFG%.  And since it's all about eFG%.  Don't know if we really made PC uncomfortable, though, because their conference average is right around 45%.

Didn't turn PC over much, but they're one of the best teams in the conference at protecting the ball.  

Did a pretty good job on the defensive boards too, holding PC well under their average.  Usually PC gets a rebound on 1/3 missed shots.  We only allowed 1/4 missed shots.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 02:02:01 PM
Quote from: socrplar125 on March 09, 2011, 01:32:02 PM
Tim Higgins and Jim Burr part of the crew reffing the St. John's/Rutgers match-up. How many crews work the 4 games today? 4? 2? 1?

I would HATE to have those two for our game... *shudder*

I believe they have 2 so I assume we will get this crew.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 09, 2011, 02:10:18 PM
Thanks for running/posting the numbers HS - oddly something I look forward to (especially when we win).
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: LON on March 09, 2011, 02:33:16 PM
Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 02:02:01 PM
I believe they have 2 so I assume we will get this crew.

Isn't a 9:30 tip (I'm assuming it will be delayed like last night) a little late for those old b@stards?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: marquette09 on March 09, 2011, 02:39:53 PM
Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 02:02:01 PM
I believe they have 2 so I assume we will get this crew.

They change the crews for every game, so we will not have Burr or Higgins tonight.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:25:28 PM
I'm not so sure about that.  A few years ago anyway, the first session first game crew did the first game of the second session.  The first session second game crew did the second game of the second session.

Maybe it has changed.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:26:08 PM
Rutgers and St. John's are going down to the wire.  Tied at 60 with a minute to go.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:29:41 PM
St. John's up 1 with 20 seconds to go.  Rutgers ball.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:30:07 PM
And Rutgers turns it over.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Bocephys on March 09, 2011, 03:30:49 PM
Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:30:07 PM
And Rutgers turns it over.

Just proves that you should never pass to a white guy.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: willie warrior on March 09, 2011, 03:34:41 PM
Huge screw up by Rutgers. Their Big Man commits an Ole fould ala Otule/Gardner 25 feet from the basket trying to block the Guard's dribble. Why these teams do this is beyond me. Same thing that MU does.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 09, 2011, 03:35:20 PM
St john's fouls up 3. rutgers hits both FT. st johns turns over the inbounds... wow. 13 seconds st johns by 1
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Bocephys on March 09, 2011, 03:35:30 PM
Quote from: Bocephys on March 09, 2011, 03:30:49 PM
Just proves that you should never pass to a white guyDwight Hardy.

Fixed
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:37:53 PM
Can Rutgers go the length of the floor in 4 seconds?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:38:15 PM
Wow. Rutgers on bad end of two no calls.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: willie warrior on March 09, 2011, 03:39:26 PM
How come Lavin did not get a warning being two feet out of the Coach's box?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: MUBurrow on March 09, 2011, 03:39:31 PM
and then the refs just quit on the game!! thats absolutely terrible. beyond pitiful.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Bocephys on March 09, 2011, 03:39:47 PM
Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 09, 2011, 03:37:53 PM
Can Rutgers go the length of the floor in 4 seconds?

Dumb inbounds play and terrible officiating at the end.  He was out of bounds with 2 full seconds left at half court.  Boy Higgins and them are awful.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 09, 2011, 03:40:16 PM
Quote from: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:38:15 PM
Wow. Rutgers on bad end of two no calls.

there was definitely a foul on the inbounds. then a travel/step out of bounds that wasn't called.

i'll say it again: I HOPE WE DON'T HAVE HIGGINS/BURR TONIGHT!!!
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:40:31 PM
And the refs run away! double wow!!
I'd be pissed if I was a rutgers fan.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Norm on March 09, 2011, 03:40:37 PM
horrible officiating in the last 14 seconds, every non-call benefiting St. John's.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: SaintPaulWarrior on March 09, 2011, 03:41:24 PM
What a joke of an ending.....no foul called on the over the back on the free throw and St. Johns guy steps out of bounds with 1.7 seconds left, throws the ball into the stands and they end the game anyway.  I think I saw Higgins.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 09, 2011, 03:42:01 PM
Quote from: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:38:15 PM
Wow. Rutgers on bad end of two no calls.

THREE bad calls.  Coburn got mugged, it was over the back, and they should have had the ball back at 1.7.

Also, horrible call by Lavin to foul with 17 seconds left.  I'm indifferent between fouling/not fouling under 6 seconds, but 17 is indefensible.

Lavin just called it "Keystone Cops" reffing at the end.  Awesome!
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: drewm88 on March 09, 2011, 03:42:07 PM
Rutgers just got fucked 3 times at the end. They were fouled on their last shot, St. John's went over the back on the FT rebound that ended up out of bounds to StJ, and the Johnnie clearly traveled and went out of bounds with 1.7 seconds left. Forget the no-calls on the fouls, Rutgers absolutely should have the ball out at mid court with 1.7 left.

What a fucking joke.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:43:03 PM
That officiating is unacceptable for this level.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: MUBurrow on March 09, 2011, 03:44:21 PM
thats entirely on Burr & Co. for being such obstinate pricks and running off the floor too.  they knew they made mistakes, and they talk themselves up to have such thick skins, theyre running off the floor before the game is even over.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 09, 2011, 03:44:37 PM
Quote from: SaintPaulWarrior on March 09, 2011, 03:41:24 PM
What a joke of an ending.....no foul called on the over the back on the free throw and St. Johns guy steps out of bounds with 1.7 seconds left, throws the ball into the stands and they end the game anyway.  I think I saw Higgins.

It was Higgins AND Burr.  Hopefully this game ends their careers.  Never seen refs get torched like this on national television before, it's unbelievable!
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: MUBurrow on March 09, 2011, 03:45:58 PM
gottlieb calling out Burr and Higgins by name too after the game. wow. i dont think ive ever seen things unravel like this before.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: QuetteHoops on March 09, 2011, 03:46:11 PM
Terrible officiating...and not only the travel/out of bounds but what about that being a technical when the St.john's player whipped the ball into the stand with time on the clock?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 09, 2011, 03:47:10 PM
Gottlieb: "...they [Burr and Higgins] need to not officiate in the tournament anymore."

just the tournament? how about college basketball anywhere, anytime.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Rollout-the-Barrel on March 09, 2011, 03:50:19 PM
Love that they were called out by espn.  Now if they could only retire to rec league reffing.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: ZMovieman on March 09, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
Quote from: socrplar125 on March 09, 2011, 03:47:10 PM
Gottlieb: "...they [Burr and Higgins] need to not officiate in the tournament anymore."

just the tournament? how about college basketball anywhere, anytime.

Seriously. How is time remaining on the clock not reviewable? Let alone the technical for the thrown ball.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TJ on March 10, 2011, 02:12:46 AM
Well, at least this incident should guarantee we don't have to see them for the rest of the BET.  Hopefully the NCAA does the same and we don't have to see them until next year, if ever again...
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: NavinRJohnson on March 10, 2011, 08:28:37 AM
Man, just look at the list of games today...

Pitt v. UConn
Syracuse v. SJU
ND v. UC
Marquette v. Uof L

Those top two in particular...Man! Just another Thursday afternoon in the Big East.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: mileskishnish72 on March 10, 2011, 08:47:09 AM
It Redemption Night! More doable if Higgins and Burr are indisposed.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: muwarrior69 on March 10, 2011, 09:34:06 AM
Despite all the bad karma for Rutgers, they are going to be competitive next year. I really like their young Coach. I was also at the Seton Hall game last Saturday when some other team was wearing Marquette uniforms. Wow, what a great venue Seton Hall now plays in. The Rock is a great place to watch a game. We had cushioned seats only 10 back from the court. Yes, I live in New Jersey and GO WARRIORS.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 12:55:14 PM
UCONN and PITT are tied with 3 and a half to go.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 01:04:00 PM
UCONN up three on number one PITT with 49 seconds to go.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: drewm88 on March 10, 2011, 01:05:08 PM
This conference, and especially the tournament, is unbelievably talented and entertaining.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 01:05:41 PM
Ashton Gibbs hit a 3 to tie it at 74.

UCONN ball with 47 seconds to play.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 01:07:34 PM
Walker missed a shot with 18 seconds left, however, UCONN got the rebound and called a timeout.  They will have a chance to win it right here.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: MUcookie30 on March 10, 2011, 01:08:46 PM
unbelievable
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 01:09:35 PM
Kemba nails a shot with a second left to win it 76-74.

How long until Boehiem starts complaining about the double bye?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: SacWarrior on March 10, 2011, 01:09:43 PM
Kemba Walker is magical. No other way to put it really.

Making us look good with how we played him
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: SaintPaulWarrior on March 10, 2011, 01:09:56 PM
Kemba with one second left from the top of the key to win it.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: drewm88 on March 10, 2011, 01:10:40 PM
What a shot. Another fun game.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 10, 2011, 01:13:43 PM
This tournament has been unbelievable!  I'd love to see us go deep in this tournament now - MSG is the focal point of the CBB world until selection Sunday.  Let's get greedy and make a statement!
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: NavinRJohnson on March 10, 2011, 01:15:32 PM
Wow. Were the x-rays on Gary McGee's ankles negative?
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 03:25:23 PM
Syracuse/St. John's is looking to go down to the wire as well. 

62-60 Syracuse with 7 to go.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 03:37:56 PM
Here we go again... Syracuse up 68-67 with 3 and a half to go.

Aside from the UCONN/DePaul game and the Marquette/Providence game, every game has been a nail biter.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: JWags85 on March 10, 2011, 03:39:23 PM
Quote from: NavinRJohnson on March 10, 2011, 01:15:32 PM
Wow. Were the x-rays on Gary McGee's ankles negative?

Yes, but he compound fractured his dignity
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 10, 2011, 03:49:20 PM
Syracuse takes it.
Title: Re: BET General Discussion Thread
Post by: SacWarrior on March 10, 2011, 04:00:36 PM
Poetic justice. Syracuse played better, and the game wouldn't have even been close if they wouldn't have called a BS hand check on Triche in the final minutes.

Of course, had the officiating been perfect there's a high likelihood St. John's wouldn't have been in the Battle of NY in the first place
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev