I just looked at the box score. We only had 11 turnovers in that game, same as Cincy. It really seemed like a lot more than that.
Also, Cincy only had one more offensive board than we did. Puzzling. It just seemed like they got so many offensive rebounds and forced a lot of turnovers.
Maybe they just converted on more of both of them.
It seemed like every turnover we had in the 1st half (the bulk of them) was converted into points. Thus it made them seem all the more painful. And generally seemed to be bad passes.
I don't know if any site tracks points off turnovers, but would be interested to see that.