MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: mileskishnish72 on February 01, 2011, 06:04:00 PM

Title: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: mileskishnish72 on February 01, 2011, 06:04:00 PM
I'm not a Badger hater - don't remember a MU/UW rivalry of any significance when I was in Wisc.
I know a lot of posters don't like the rodents - shouldn't we be rooting for them for our RPI tonight?

I've got to admit I get confused about how the RPI is computed and don't like going through the math.
It seems that if a team that beat us beats a good team it should help us. Right/
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: warthog-driver on February 01, 2011, 08:05:57 PM
Go Boilermakers Go!
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: MUEng92 on February 01, 2011, 08:06:25 PM
This was a great game if you like watching paint dry

-Fran Fracshilla


Classic
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: romey on February 01, 2011, 08:09:17 PM
I saw the beginning of the second half when Purdue hit 9 of 10 or something like that to take the lead - then I saw the last minute where they were fouling Wisconsin to get the ball back.  I assume they just cooled off.  Anyone see how they lost the lead?
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: The Man in Gold on February 01, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
Quote from: romey on February 01, 2011, 08:09:17 PM
I saw the beginning of the second half when Purdue hit 9 of 10 or something like that to take the lead - then I saw the last minute where they were fouling Wisconsin to get the ball back.  I assume they just cooled off.  Anyone see how they lost the lead?

Traditional defense
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: reinko on February 01, 2011, 08:26:16 PM
Superbar.  Frack the Big Tweleven.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: 4everwarriors on February 01, 2011, 09:04:33 PM
Jordan Taylor has a great chance to play the point in the Association.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: GGGG on February 01, 2011, 09:08:09 PM
Quote from: The Man in Gold on February 01, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
Traditional defense


I wish MU would play defense like that occasionally.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on February 01, 2011, 09:23:09 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 01, 2011, 09:04:33 PM
Jordan Taylor has a great chance to play the point in the Association.

I hope he leaves early, so Wisco loses Leuer, Nankivil, Jarmusz, and Taylor.

Also, check out Taylor's freshman year stats:

13.2 mpg
1.6 ppg
0.9 rpg
1.2 apg
2.24 A/TO
26.0% fg
58.8% ft
19.2% 3fg
80.9 ORtg

Taylor's junior year stats:

35.5 mpg
17.4 ppg
4.5 rpg
4.5 apg
3.91 A/TO
45.5% fg
87.1% 3fg
130.9 ORtg

Something to keep in mind next time someone bitches about Vander or any of our other underclassmen.  The fact that we don't rely on freshmen & sophomores is a good thing, not something to complain about.  They get better with age, and that's when they see the court.  The fact that our bench is loaded with top 100 underclassmen should make us excited about the future, not whine about the present.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: BCHoopster on February 01, 2011, 11:35:00 PM
It really is hard for a freshman point to make a difference.  That is why it is to bad Reggie Smith left the program.
He had the same quickness as Trevon Hughes, and maybe a better shot.  If you look at Trevon stats as a freshman
I would say they look similar to Jordan Taylor.  That is why you have to believe that Junior will be much improved
next year.  For one, he will work on shots that he needs to improve over the summer.  For him, it is 500 jumpers
behind the 3 point line.  Derrick Wilson will go thru the same issues next year so you might see Vander back -up
Cadougan. Now if Junior needs to take 500 shots a day, Vander needs to take a 1000!
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: willie warrior on February 02, 2011, 10:30:54 AM
They probably both need to take 1000, although it is pretty hard to look at Cadougan's outside jumper as he rarely takes one.

Unlike Dom James--that guy would keep jacking them up whether he was close or not.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 02, 2011, 11:18:53 AM
Quote from: Jamailman on February 01, 2011, 09:23:09 PM
I hope he leaves early, so Wisco loses Leuer, Nankivil, Jarmusz, and Taylor.

Also, check out Taylor's freshman year stats:

13.2 mpg
1.6 ppg
0.9 rpg
1.2 apg
2.24 A/TO
26.0% fg
58.8% ft
19.2% 3fg
80.9 ORtg

Taylor's junior year stats:

35.5 mpg
17.4 ppg
4.5 rpg
4.5 apg
3.91 A/TO
45.5% fg
87.1% 3fg
130.9 ORtg

Something to keep in mind next time someone bitches about Vander or any of our other underclassmen.  The fact that we don't rely on freshmen & sophomores is a good thing, not something to complain about.  They get better with age, and that's when they see the court.  The fact that our bench is loaded with top 100 underclassmen should make us excited about the future, not whine about the present.

I can assure you that JT will be back for his senior season.
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: brewcity77 on February 02, 2011, 03:21:01 PM
Quote from: Jamailman on February 01, 2011, 09:23:09 PM
Taylor's junior year stats:

35.5 mpg
17.4 ppg
4.5 rpg
4.5 apg
3.91 A/TO
45.5% fg
87.1% 3fg
130.9 ORtg

I'm pretty sure that as good as Taylor is, he's not shooting 87.1% from three ;D
Title: Re: Wisconsin/Purdue
Post by: APieperFan3 on February 02, 2011, 04:09:48 PM
Hate Becky as much as the next guy.

But they closed the door last night. Ryan Evans was the "hero".

Still no convinced they will do much in the tourney b/c they need BOTH Leuer and Taylor to carry them night in and night out.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev