I thought it would be interesting to look at the stats of MU after 8 Big East games.
Playing Time:
Average Minutes Per Game Played
Butler - 36.8
DJO - 33.0
Crowder - 32.0
Buycks - 29.5
Cadougan - 19.6
Blue - 18.6
Otule - 15.1
Fulce - 9.4
Gardner - 5.5
Jones - 2.3
Williams - 2.0
Frozena - 1.0
Percent of Total Game Minutes Played (8 games, 320 minutes)
Butler - 294 minutes - 91.9%
DJO - 264 min - 82.5%
Crowder - 256 min - 80.0%
Buycks - 236 min - 73.8%
Cadougan - 157 min - 49.1%
Blue - 149 min - 46.6%
Otule - 121 min - 37.8%
Fulce - 75 min - 23.4%
Gardner - 33 min - 10.3%
Jones - 7 min - 2.2%
Williams - 6 min - 1.9%
Frozena - 2 min - 0.6%
Points:
DJO - 162 pts - 20.3ppg
Butler - 126 pts - 15.8ppg
Crowder - 123 pts - 15.4ppg
Buycks - 93 pts - 11.6ppg
Blue - 30 pts - 3.8ppg
Fulce - 30 pts - 3.8ppg
Otule - 27 pts - 3.4ppg
Cadougan - 24 pts - 3.0ppg
Gardner - 3 pts - 0.5ppg
Williams - 1 pt - 0.3ppg
Jones - 0 pts - 0.0ppg
Frozena - 0 pts - 0.0ppg
Rebounds:
Crowder - 60 - 7.5rpg
Butler - 53 - 6.6rpg
Buycks - 26 - 3.3rpg
DJO - 22 - 2.8rpg
Blue - 22 - 2.8rpg
Cadougan - 18 - 2.3rpg
Fulce - 17 - 2.1rpg
Otule - 13 - 1.6rpg
Gardner - 4 - 0.7rpg
Jones - 1 - 0.3rpg
Frozena - 1 - 0.3rpg
Williams - 0 - 0.0rpg
Assist/Turnover Ratio:
Crowder - 18/4 - 4.5
Cadougan - 24/9 - 2.7
DJO - 24/13 - 1.8
Butler - 19/11 - 1.7
Buycks - 26/16 - 1.6
Blue - 12/10 - 1.2
Gardner - 2/4 - 0.5
Otule - 1/10 - 0.1
Fulce - 4/0 - 4.0
Williams - 0/0 - 0.0
Jones - 0/0 - 0.0
Frozena - 0/0 - 0.0
MU really, really relies on its big four of DJO, Butler, Crowder and Buycks.
Otule is improving, but his Big East stats are pretty ugly.
Blue and Cadougan chip in their share, but it is a wasted year so far for Williams and Jones.
Gotta like Crowder's stats. NIce.....
Blue's 3.8ppg is sort of a shock, thought it was higher. Needs a good second half.
Otule is not improving.
They want Otule to defend. That's all he is at this point.
The lack of scoring outside of the "Big Four" is likely the reason that our rotation is too short. Next year, two of those guys are leaving so I hope that at least two will step up....if not a third or a fourth.
I read Otule's role a little differently. The way I see it, Otule is valued for his ability to get good offensive position, even when he doesn't get the ball (which is more often than not). When Otule posts up (the deeper the better) he keeps the other team's largest defender out of the paint and restricts him to tight man to man. This goes a long way to opening up the paint, and doesn't allow the other team's 5 to roam the basket area, making it nearly impossible for our smaller players to drive and finish. It also makes it easier for JFB to try to score from the other block.
Quote from: MUBurrow on January 27, 2011, 08:42:17 AM
I read Otule's role a little differently. The way I see it, Otule is valued for his ability to get good offensive position, even when he doesn't get the ball (which is more often than not). When Otule posts up (the deeper the better) he keeps the other team's largest defender out of the paint and restricts him to tight man to man. This goes a long way to opening up the paint, and doesn't allow the other team's 5 to roam the basket area, making it nearly impossible for our smaller players to drive and finish. It also makes it easier for JFB to try to score from the other block.
+1
He is a space eater. Our PIP are up
35% this season...while our FT's made are up
23%. Our bigs open up driving lanes. Their value isn't often found in their individual statistics. I liked in the UCONN game that Buzz went to Otule at least four times at the start of the game in the deep block trying to establish an interior presence.
btw, our opponents' PIP metric is down (1.6%).
Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on January 27, 2011, 09:09:32 AM
+1
He is a space eater. Our PIP are up 35% this season...while our FT's made are up 23%. Our bigs open up driving lanes. Their value isn't often found in their individual statistics. I liked in the UCONN game that Buzz went to Otule at least four times at the start of the game in the deep block trying to establish an interior presence.
btw, our opponents' PIP metric is down (1.6%).
OK, so PIP are up ... now let's see how effective MU's bigs are against this zone. I hope we see more minutes from Gardner -- he's more effective at passing out of the post than Otule and could help reverse the ball to find open slots in the zone.
Quote from: NYWarrior on January 29, 2011, 08:50:59 AM
OK, so PIP are up ... now let's see how effective MU's bigs are against this zone. I hope we see more minutes from Gardner -- he's more effective at passing out of the post than Otule and could help reverse the ball to find open slots in the zone.
Agree on Gardner. Last year MU lost the PIP Battle 56-22 to Cuse. I suspect Buzz will go small ball primarily, though, with lots of flashing up at the FT line by Jimmy or circling up Joe/Jae at the key. Jae better have his inside game on as well.
So, PIP was 34-24 in favor of Cuse. But, PIP+FTM was 48 to 42 MU. Glad to see Buzz give the minutes to Otule and Gardner vs. all small ball against the zone. Still hard to see in the individual stat line, but the spacing a low post presence provides frees up our skills players. We won the rebounding battle as well against a taller team in a tough zone.