Did anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
We haven't had a decent shot coming out of a time out in a long time!
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:13:32 PM
Did anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
I think your posts are obnoxious. But, no I did not expect anything different.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:13:32 PM
Did anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
I liked the play.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:13:32 PM
Did anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
Did you cheer when Buycks hit the go-ahead shot?
Quote from: MarquetteFan94 on December 29, 2010, 10:21:34 PM
Did you cheer when Buycks hit the go-ahead shot?
yeah, but I knew they would give up a basket in return. i just hoped there would be some time left for MU to get a last shot off.
Quote from: MarquetteFan94 on December 29, 2010, 10:21:34 PM
Did you cheer when Buycks hit the go-ahead shot?
Obvioulsy not as he enjoys holding a grudge against a 20 something aged kid. I sure hope he's a young kid because there's no way a grown man should go that route.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:23:09 PM
yeah, but I knew they would give up a basket in return. i just hoped there would be some time left for MU to get a last shot off.
So you didn't like DJO having the ball going to the hoop with a ball screen and enough time to get to the lane? Was Buzz supposed to project a no call on a trip or a freak slip/fall? What would you have drawn up?
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:23:09 PM
yeah, but I knew they would give up a basket in return. i just hoped there would be some time left for MU to get a last shot off.
Until you change your BS forum name there's no reason for anyone here to even acknowledge you.
Quote from: avid1010 on December 29, 2010, 10:25:02 PM
So you didn't like DJO having the ball going to the hoop with a ball screen and enough time to get to the lane?
DJO running full-speed with his head down, completely out of control? Nope, didn't like that one bit.
How can the monitors of this site have a member with a name like "nomorebuycks"? The kid is one of the bright spots of this team, and keeps getting better. And he hit a huge shot at the end tonight that gave MUBB a chanced to win.
Quote from: MarquetteFan94 on December 29, 2010, 10:26:22 PM
Until you change your BS forum name there's no reason for anyone here to even acknowledge you.
which you just did...
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:26:44 PM
DJO running full-speed with his head down, completely out of control? Nope, didn't like that one bit.
dude... there was like 4 seconds left to go full court... what was he supposed to do? lope?
Title of this post is wrong. It was not an "easy layup." It was a shot over a 6' 11" defender. Layup yes, easy, no. So your wrong on this point.
And, without Buycks shot the play before, the "layup" would not have mattered. So, your handle is wrong as well.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:27:22 PM
which you just did...
So, you knew Vandy would score after Buycks hit the shot? Since you can predict the future how's the rest of the season going to play out?
What did you think of Buycks' performance?
Honestly, how you think it's remotely appropriate to post under your BS name is all we need to know about you.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:13:32 PM
Did anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
No, no, and no. It's no longer even remotely surprising. But I would like more Buycks, especially from outside against zones.
Quote from: chren21 on December 29, 2010, 10:16:26 PM
I think your posts are obnoxious. But, no I did not expect anything different.
He's just trying to get his post count up... i've been waiting for him to say something that doesn't annoy me, but he just won't take his HEAD out of his A$$. Probably lives in the apartment above Golden Chicken.
I thought Vandy had to work hard to get that winning shot off.
Plus, if normal officiating had been applied to that last play, it may have worked out.
A lot of people say they didn't call a trip on DJO because we wouldn't get that call on the road.
On the flip side, couldn't you say if we played tighter D, they would call a foul on us for being on the road?
Call on the road at the end of the game. Have gone to it like 3 times already but... Georgetown '08. Kthnxbye.
Quote from: nomorebuycks on December 29, 2010, 10:13:32 PMDid anyone expect any different?
Did anyone really think MU would tighten the defense on that final play?
Did anyone really think Buzz would draw up a play that actually led to a good shot?
Glad to see you're smugly satisfied about the loss. Never mind that your favorite player was one of the best we had on the floor tonight. If it helps you any, we pretty much stamped our ticket to the NIT tonight. That should give you orgasms for the next three months. Maybe that will keep your drivel off this site.
Quote from: brewcity77 on December 29, 2010, 11:10:48 PM
Glad to see you're smugly satisfied about the loss. Never mind that your favorite player was one of the best we had on the floor tonight. If it helps you any, we pretty much stamped our ticket to the NIT tonight. That should give you orgasms for the next three months. Maybe that will keep your drivel off this site.
yes, Buycks was one of the best last night. He had a lot of minutes and was the best turnover guy for MU. Just sayin'
Quote from: AnotherMU84 on December 29, 2010, 10:32:13 PM
Title of this post is wrong. It was not an "easy layup." It was a shot over a 6' 11" defender. Layup yes, easy, no. So your wrong on this point.
I think the point is that there were 3 men down low and 2 MU defenders and Vandy found the open man before Otule could rotate over. Simple math, they had numbers up down low.
Quote from: willie warrior on December 30, 2010, 07:29:04 AM
yes, Buycks was one of the best last night. He had a lot of minutes and was the best turnover guy for MU. Just sayin'
So, if it was up to you, Buycks should've only seen limited time last night, right? Do you even watch this team? Would we have been better off with Junior running things?
You keep comparing Buycks to McNeal b/c of the turnovers, etc....it's tiresome, we get it. You conveniently don't mention his 6-9 shooting (including the biggest clutch shot this team has hit this season), 4 Rebounds, 4 assists and 2 steals.
You take the good with the bad. People need to back off Buycks right now.
Quote from: mupanther on December 29, 2010, 10:42:58 PM
I thought Vandy had to work hard to get that winning shot off.
I agree. Vandy showed pretty good composure moving it around and finding the open man. Easy to panic in that situation.
Any criticism of Buycks last night is simply ignorant, as is the failure to recognize the strenths he brings to the team.
The one thing that people seem to fail to mention, and perhaps because it wasn't as big a deal as when I first saw it, was Crowder's decision to jump out to the top of the key to double the shooter leaving 2 men under the basket for O'tule to guard. You can see that O'tule tries to guard both guys and when the player who made the layup gets the pass, O'tule has to recover to defend him.
I really didn't see the need to double a shooter at the top of the key and leave 2 men under the basket. Anyone else?
In hindsight, no he shouldn't have doubled... but the result was their 5th best player on the floor making a contested layup. I guess its hard to have it both ways, I was sure 1 of the 2 wings was going for the win, that is usually the mentality of a scorer and ideally they would have because it would have been extremely well contested. It seemed like there was a little too much time on the clock to be pressuring so hard, but I like getting it out of the best players hands. If Jenkins took a semi contested 1 on 1 shot and buried it (ala Butler from WV last year), the same people would have been complaining the same amount.
Quote from: StillWarriors on December 30, 2010, 08:15:50 AM
I agree. Vandy showed pretty good composure moving it around and finding the open man. Easy to panic in that situation.
Any criticism of Buycks last night is simply ignorant, as is the failure to recognize the strenths he brings to the team.
+1
Buycks made a few boneheaded turnovers, but his strengths to the team far outweigh anything anyone else is going to bring to the table. DJO and him seemed to be gelling a little better last night.
Quote from: muCHIcity22 on December 30, 2010, 10:24:46 AM
The one thing that people seem to fail to mention, and perhaps because it wasn't as big a deal as when I first saw it, was Crowder's decision to jump out to the top of the key to double the shooter leaving 2 men under the basket for O'tule to guard. You can see that O'tule tries to guard both guys and when the player who made the layup gets the pass, O'tule has to recover to defend him.
I really didn't see the need to double a shooter at the top of the key and leave 2 men under the basket. Anyone else?
Crowder didn't double. The guy was coming off a screen up top and Crowder jumped it. It wasn't the best decision...I'd rather have the guy shoot on the move off of a screen.