Someone tell me again exactly what Wisconsin has done to warrant the seed everyone seems to think they are likely to get. They have exactly one road win against a team that will be in the NCAA tournament - which just happens to be against MU in an in-state rivalry game. After that, their best road/neutral win is a toss-up among Georgia, Ilinois or Iowa. That's pathetic.
I find it interesting that their first Big 10 Tournament game is likely to be against Michigan State. If they should lose that one, do they even get/deserve a 2 seed?
Big heapin' helping of who cares?
It fits Bo's style. They haven't done anything super spectacular, but they haven't done anything bad. Just like Bo's teams are perfect in the NCAA when they play a seed worse than theirs and winless when the team is seeded higher than them. They do what they are supposed to do. Not flashy, but also not inconsistent.
They are 6 in the RPI and top 5 in the polls. That's a 2 seed to me. I can't argue with that.
Its hard to argue with them being anything but a 2 seed. Ohio State would be the #1 seed from the Big Ten and Wisc deserves the 2 from being 25-4 and beating us. No way do both them and OSU get 1 seeds coming out of that conference this year. I think a case could be made that G-Town is more deserving of a 1 seed, particularly if they win the BE tournament.