MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: mstang917 on November 14, 2010, 10:44:12 PM

Title: Potential Lineup?
Post by: mstang917 on November 14, 2010, 10:44:12 PM
PG: DJO/Buycks
SG: Butler
SF: Crowder
PF: Gardner
C: Otule

Could be our power lineup haha
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 14, 2010, 10:50:31 PM
PG: Buycks
SG: DJO
SF: Butler
PF: Fulce
C: Otule

Gotta keep the vets in.
The energy's on the bench. So what if Otule picks up two fouls early. Better him than Davante.
Plus, I think running Vander and Reggie together is gonna be a good thing for us down the road.
Crowder can spell Butler. EWill, Fulce.
Jamail can probably help out with Butler, DJO minutes.
Leaving Frozena as the eternal optimist!
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: wojosdojo on November 14, 2010, 11:07:46 PM
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on November 14, 2010, 10:50:31 PM
PG: Buycks
SG: DJO
SF: Butler
PF: Fulce
C: Otule

Gotta keep the vets in.
The energy's on the bench. So what if Otule picks up two fouls early. Better him than Davante.
Plus, I think running Vander and Reggie together is gonna be a good thing for us down the road.
Crowder can spell Butler. EWill, Fulce.
Jamail can probably help out with Butler, DJO minutes.
Leaving Frozena as the eternal optimist!

There it is. Buzz needs DJ in the lineup.
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: HoopsMalone on November 14, 2010, 11:11:08 PM
Quote from: mstang917 on November 14, 2010, 10:44:12 PM
PG: DJO/Buycks
SG: Butler
SF: Crowder
PF: Gardner
C: Otule

Could be our power lineup haha

I would really like to see how that would look.  I would guess it would be completely on offense though.  Everyone basically scores in the paint and no spacing.
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: beaconwarrior on November 14, 2010, 11:23:05 PM
I'm thinking Vander will be a starter all season long. Buzz has said that he likes Vander because "he wants to be coached." As long as he keeps doing what he's been doing in practice and in games, Vander will be a mainstay.

PG: Buycks
SG: DJO
SF: Vander
PF: Butler
C: Otule

It will be interesting to see how long Otule will start and if Gardner can keep up the great play.
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: PBRme on November 15, 2010, 07:49:57 AM
If you go by minutes played so far

Butler
Buycks
Crowder
Blue
DJO

And that lineup would not surprise me.

With Junior and Reggie spelling Buycks and DJO. AND Fulce, Otule, Williams, and Gardner spelling Blue, Crowder and Butler.
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: reinko on November 15, 2010, 08:04:30 AM
Quote from: mstang917 on November 14, 2010, 10:44:12 PM
PG: DJO/Buycks
SG: Butler
SF: Crowder
PF: Gardner
C: Otule

Could be our power lineup haha

Wouldn't be surprised to see that in spurts against UCONN and Syracuse...
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: willie warrior on November 15, 2010, 08:40:02 AM
This is the winning line-up:
C: Otule/Gardner split the minutes and fouls with the OX getting more minutes
PG Cadougan
F Butler
F Crowder
2G DJO
Blue and Bucyks off the bench, interchangeable with the Guards and/or at the wing when going smaller or for matchup purposes; Fulce and Williams to spot the forwards and/or at Center for relief; and Smith and Jones to pick up minutes in blow outs, excessive foul trouble or injuries/illnesses
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: bilsu on November 15, 2010, 09:54:44 AM
Buzz is sticking with his three guard lineup. Both games Butler has been annouced as a guard. I thought I heard wrong at the Praire View game. However, Butler was annouced as a guard for Bucknel also.

C. Otule
F Crowder
G Butler
G Blue
G Buyckes

Cadougan and Gardner are going to be teamed together a lot. They are both half court players. Cadougan is the best point guard to get the ball to Gardner. Looking forward one year it will be interesting to see Jamal Wilson teamed with Gardner. Wilson is the best passer on the team.
Title: Re: Potential Lineup?
Post by: NavinRJohnson on November 15, 2010, 10:05:41 AM
I would not be the least bit surprised to see Vander Blue lead the team in minutes played. It is quickly becoming obvious that he is likely to be the straw that stirs the drink this year. I am guessing Buycks, Butler, and DJO will be right up there as well, but any of the lineups above that do not have Blue in them can probably be deleted. As big as Gardner was, Blue had a 5-pt stretch in the midst of that run with about 7 minutes left that essentially put that game away.

If Buycks can effectively play PG, that's fine with me. Keep him out there along with Blue and DJO. If not, I think he will be best suited to come off the bench and score.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev