MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Skatastrophy on August 17, 2010, 10:54:22 AM

Title: Playing in-state schools
Post by: Skatastrophy on August 17, 2010, 10:54:22 AM
Looks like Notre Dame is catching the same garbage that we caught when we weren't scheduling in-state schools.  Granted UWM, UW-M and UWGB aren't Purdue, I4 and Butler but still...

http://www.nwitimes.com/sports/columnists/al-hamnik/article_816c245c-b9fa-5e36-82de-8fed6ec60833.html

and it looks like at least one in-state reporter thinks that the WI schools should play each other in a tournament like this going forward.  I'm not opposed to the tournament, but the seat allotment and revenue sharing I'd not be too happy with when we're obviously bringing significantly more to the table:

http://www.fdlreporter.com/article/20100817/FON0210/8170522/Paul-Keup-Blog-Wisconsin-could-follow-Hoosier-State-with-hoops-classic
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: TJ on August 17, 2010, 11:03:58 AM
QuoteMilwaukee and Green Bay already play twice as members of the Horizon League, but, unless there's some archaic NCAA rule, why couldn't the two teams also play a nonconference game?
Surprisingly enough, there is some archaic NCAA rule preventing that game.  That guy didn't even try to do research.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: GGGG on August 17, 2010, 12:19:55 PM
MU and UW already play every year in front of sold out crowds.  Why would you add UWGB and UWM to that mix?  It's not as though it would bring additional revenue.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: Hamostradamus on August 17, 2010, 12:27:10 PM
He doesn't want the game in Miller Park because of the weather? The entire UWM fanbase travels in one minivan and the weather is the reason? Brilliant.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: bilsu on August 17, 2010, 01:33:35 PM
You could have the first round matchup between UWGB and UWM be an actaul conference game. The trouble with that is that MU and UW would then face in the first round. But then we be at least guaranteed a game against UW.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: GGGG on August 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM
bilsu, what he is proposing is a double header...not an actual tournament.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: SacWarrior on August 17, 2010, 02:37:46 PM
Dairyland Classic?

You mean the UW-MU game that we already do every year? It's already a foregone conclusion that MU will beat UWM (as we always do) and UW will beat UWGB (like they always d-

Oh yeah...
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: MU86NC on August 17, 2010, 02:56:36 PM
When I first heard about the IN in state tourney I immediately considered who the four would be in WI.  After MU and the Badgers things drop off pretty quickly.  I would rather watch in IN tourney in terms of top tier teams...
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on August 17, 2010, 04:04:06 PM
It's not a tournament in Indiana, just a double header.  A one day event, basically. 
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: bilsu on August 17, 2010, 04:24:31 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on August 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM
bilsu, what he is proposing is a double header...not an actual tournament.

I assumed it was a tournament. Why would the schools play a double header? That makes no sense for UW and MU.
Title: Re: Playing in-state schools
Post by: MerrittsMustache on August 17, 2010, 07:29:12 PM
Quote from: bilsu on August 17, 2010, 04:24:31 PM
I assumed it was a tournament. Why would the schools play a double header? That makes no sense for UW and MU.

As a MU fan, I personally would have no interest in watching Wisco play UWM or UWGB. I have a feeling that I'm not alone on that. I also have a feeling that Badger fans would feel the same way about watching MU play either of those other schools.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev