MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: tower912 on February 24, 2007, 06:30:20 PM

Title: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: tower912 on February 24, 2007, 06:30:20 PM
The inconsistent foul calls in the first half fueled ND's energy, as well as killing our defensive intensity, substitution pattern, and offensive flow.  It is impossible to press and damn tough to make any sort of run with so many valuable players in foul trouble.   And finally, why should shrekenstein, the uberfrosh think there would be repercussions for leveling McNeal from behind or punking Fitz going for a loose ball when the way the game has been called leads him to believe he can get away with it.    MU played poorly for the last 30 minutes of this game, with no one consistently able to hit shots, but you can't hit shots from the bench.   And that is where our offensive balance spent too much of the game due to foul trouble.
Title: Did you mean to say...
Post by: MUCam on February 24, 2007, 07:48:47 PM
...Foul trouble helped dictate the outcome of this game?

If so, I agree. If  not, then I disagree.

There were ticky tack fouls in the first half; no doubt about it. But, our players have to understand that tight officiating means back off a bit. Is that conducive to our style of play? Not at all, but it happens, and we have to adjust. I do not think that there were an exceptional number of "bad" calls in this game. We got ourselves into foul trouble and we paid for it. We have no depth at the guard positions, which really hurts when McNeal and Matthews got into trouble.

As for the Ogre's "hard" foul on McNeal, I don't take any exception to it. It was actually, fairly clean, with only slight body contact...and the officials called the foul. What transpired afterwards (ie. the standing and taunting) is a different matter.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: MUDPT on February 24, 2007, 07:55:26 PM
I agree.  Many times on breaks you see guys just go up to stop a dunk and they injure somebody (see Posey, James).  Harangody was at least going for the ball.  And I don't understand the taunting.  He fouled the guy, it wasn't a clean block. 

By the way, ND didn't have any clean blocks today.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: tower912 on February 24, 2007, 07:59:03 PM
All any player wants is for the game to be called the same at both ends of the floor.   That way they can make the necessary adjustments to stay out of foul trouble.   This game was not called consistently.  Ergo.....
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: TJ on February 24, 2007, 08:12:14 PM
Quote from: MUDPT on February 24, 2007, 07:55:26 PM
By the way, ND didn't have any clean blocks today.
Harangody's block on Matthews was clean.  His ensuing push of Matthews that got called as a foul on Matthews apparently for being pushed was not good, but the block was clean.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: Murffieus on February 24, 2007, 08:16:09 PM
Officiating can't be blamed for this loss----ND beat us to death inside ! When you let a team score inside as ND did -----the odds are you lose!
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: nycwarrior on February 24, 2007, 08:35:15 PM
Gotta agree that you can't blame this on the refs.

We had no answer for their freshman big man. Our usually well-prepared team had no answer for a big guy who could only shoot with his right. Tough second half for Ooze. The drops and strips in the lane midway through hurt us when we still had a chance to win.

This team can be one of the most fun to watch teams that MU has fielded but their margin for error is razor thin. If they're not dominant on D and patient on the other side, they won't win. Taht simple. Even games against teams like South Florida are a challenge when you struggle for every bucket.

Pitt is all important. Get things rollin against the panthers and then win a couple in the Conference Tourney and we can get our swagger back. Fail to end strong and it doesn't seem likely that our dance will be a happy one.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: mviale on February 24, 2007, 08:40:52 PM
I didnt have the opportunity to see the game, but the radio made it sound like our guys were holding back after some early foul trouble.   This always happens to us when Mcneil loses his intensity( MU 23- ND 10).  This allowed ND to get back into the game and fans exploded.  

I blame the refs.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on February 24, 2007, 10:04:28 PM
Quote from: Murffieus on February 24, 2007, 08:16:09 PM
Officiating can't be blamed for this loss----ND beat us to death inside ! When you let a team score inside as ND did -----the odds are you lose!

When you shoot 36%, that usually leads to a loss as well.  I think every game we have lost this year we have shot less than 40%.  If we shoot respectably, like 43%, we almost always win.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: Nukem2 on February 25, 2007, 11:28:30 AM
My only complaint is that refs let Harangody shoulder his way through people and use his hands and arms elbows to push people aside.  Those tactics are usually called fouls.  But, what can you do?
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: 🏀 on February 25, 2007, 12:51:11 PM
Goody was shouldering.

ND was thugging us.

We couldn't play tough D because we had 3 players with 4 fouls early in the second half.

Ooze was getting beaten up on the inside. Goody was getting his shots in there, I've never seen Ooze complain much but he was getting murdered.

DJ wasn't able to turn the corner on anyone because the refs continually failed to call a blocking or a hook until the second half.

It was very muchj poor officiating.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: 77fan88warrior on February 25, 2007, 03:04:48 PM
Remember these names.

Reggie Greenwood, Bryan Kersey, Paul Faia.
[/size]
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: MUCHI814 on February 25, 2007, 03:36:23 PM
I think this was the second poor officiating game in a row.  I was very unimpressed with John Cale's crew last week.  Both ways, I remember looking at my buddies even when Villanova would get called for fouls and everyone agreed that was no foul.  They talk about these guys as being highly respected officials but im not impressed.  They did the Georgetown/Pitt game right before the MU game and I thought there a shitload of bs calls in that game as well.  All in all I'm not impressed by these "respected" refs and I wont give them the benefit of the doubt.  I still wont blame our loss on the refs though, you never can, it's up to your players to make adjustments, they knew how that game was gonna be called within the first 5 minutes.
Title: Re: Officiating dictated the outcome of this game
Post by: 77fan88warrior on February 25, 2007, 03:45:14 PM
I couldn't agree more about Villanova game. The announcers were surprised by some calls and defended them by saying that two of them had worked final fours.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev