deleted.
Sometimes it's good to read context.
I kind of read this as him not being convinced we really need a big guy. But that what we just need is really good players.
But for me, I think we need a quality big guy :)
Even without a "Big Guy" it would be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".
Quote from: Daniel on March 24, 2010, 09:02:15 AM
I kind of read this as him not being convinced we really need a big guy. But that what we just need is really good players.
I think it was more Buzz telling the media what he's been hearing from other people. He understands that big men are needed, but not necessarily required. I also think that, without reading TOO much into his 3 sentences, that a really good player would trump a 'big-man-for-the-sake-of-having-a-big-man' type of player any day for Buzz.
Quote from: MUCrew on March 24, 2010, 09:18:43 AM
I think it was more Buzz telling the media what he's been hearing from other people. He understands that big men are needed, but not necessarily required. I also think that, without reading TOO much into his 3 sentences, that a really good player would trump a 'big-man-for-the-sake-of-having-a-big-man' type of player any day for Buzz.
+1
Quote from: TJ on March 24, 2010, 09:17:36 AM
Even without a "Big Guy" it will be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".
fixed
Quote from: TJ on March 24, 2010, 09:17:36 AM
Even without a "Big Guy" it would be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".
But then how would we know which team is ours?
Agree need good atheletes but without height you put yourself in a position that you have lesss alternatives and less room for error.