While I am loath to start yet another thread on yet another site that has bracket predictions .. the "S-Curve" is frequently mentioned .. this is a pretty nifty site, with S-Curve numbers, commentary .. and even "distance" calculation for each school and the NCAA tourney sites.
Had MU at a #8, dropped them to #9 after the loss to ND.
Need to click on the tabs at the top to get any of the stats:
http://www.crashingthedance.com
According to their own site, these are their stats from 2009: "32 of 34 (94%) at-large selections correct again, and 55 of 65 (85%) of seeds within one seed line."
That's pretty damn good.
Quote from: mu_hilltopper on March 07, 2010, 06:59:45 PM
Had MU at a #8, dropped them to #9 after the loss to ND.
i agree with other scoopers that i'd rather be a 10-11-12, rather than an 8-9. i think we'd have to beat st johns/uconn and at least nova to be considered for a 6-7. with that said, would we be better off losing to SJ/Uconn and hoping for a 10-11-12? i'm in the camp that we're already in, regardless of the results of the BET and have to think we have a better shot at going farther in the NCAA with a 10-11-12 seed.
Quote from: Avenue Commons on March 07, 2010, 09:07:40 PM
According to their own site, these are their stats from 2009: "32 of 34 (94%) at-large selections correct again, and 55 of 65 (85%) of seeds within one seed line."
That's pretty damn good.
Especially good when you consider all of the procedural moves that messes up seeding.