MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 10:53:03 AM

Title: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 10:53:03 AM
 I know there is plenty of season left, but as of now they have Marquette as a rising #10 seed. If the season ended today we would play Maryland in the first round, and if we won we would play Duke. I think Maryland would be an interesting matchup but I think that game would be a toss-up.

  Also, if we were to play a #2 seed in the second round I wouldn't mind playing Duke. To be honest when the bracket comes out obviously its always tough to not feel the urge to pick Marquette, even though you root for them either way but I would be scared as an opposing team to play MU. Obviously nothing is set in stone but it is always interesting to contemplate match-ups.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:00:01 AM
That scenario could not happen. Duke and Maryland can't be on the same side of a bracket until the region finals because they're in the same conference. I wonder if Lunardi's just being lazy or will edit it in a bit.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Benny B on February 26, 2010, 11:44:24 AM
Quote from: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:00:01 AM
That scenario could not happen. Duke and Maryland can't be on the same side of a bracket until the region finals because they're in the same conference. I wonder if Lunardi's just being lazy or will edit it in a bit.

Well, it could happen... it's not a rule, but one of the NCAA's "we'd like to avoid these types of things at all costs" guidelines.  But the only way it would happen is that if it was unavoidable to place two conference teams in the same pod, meaning that just about the entire ACC conference would have to be in the field for such a scenario to even be plausible.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Aughnanure on February 26, 2010, 11:50:58 AM
Id rather barely get in as a 12 seed. Anything other than 7-10 would be fine with me. In a way I hope we don't rise too much b/c I can't see a scenario where we can do any better than a 7.

By the way, are BCS conference teams not allowed to be anything worse than a 12 seed? It just seems the way people talk about this that the 12 seed is the highest we can get or we are probably out.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:56:03 AM
Quote from: Benny B on February 26, 2010, 11:44:24 AM
Well, it could happen... it's not a rule, but one of the NCAA's "we'd like to avoid these types of things at all costs" guidelines.  But the only way it would happen is that if it was unavoidable to place two conference teams in the same pod, meaning that just about the entire ACC conference would have to be in the field for such a scenario to even be plausible.

It would have to be if 9 teams from any conference got in. There would be definite overlap then. I know some people were freaking out about that happening when the Big East expanded to 16. Are you sure it's not a rule? I know, for instance, if let's say Wisconsin got a three and Marquette got a 6 ;D or an eleven, the committee would attempt to keep Marquette away from a possible second round matchup because they played in the regular season, but this scenario is not a rule. I thought the conference thingy was one. Ah well, just happy March is right around the corner.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:59:02 AM
Quote from: KCMarq09 on February 26, 2010, 11:50:58 AM
Id rather barely get in as a 12 seed. Anything other than 7-10 would be fine with me. In a way I hope we don't rise too much b/c I can't see a scenario where we can do any better than a 7.

By the way, are BCS conference teams not allowed to be anything worse than a 12 seed? It just seems the way people talk about this that the 12 seed is the highest we can get or we are probably out.

BCS schools are protected until a 13 seed-it doesn't happen often that a BCS school nets a 13 however.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:03:57 PM
 The other thing that nobody is talking about is how many teams win conference tournaments that weren't going to make the tournament to begin with. One or two teams winning conference tournaments at the end of the year that weren't going to get an at-large throws off everything.

I could be wrong, and this is w/o checking I think Georgia was a #13 seed when they made it into the tourney either last year or 2 years ago.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 12:09:32 PM
Lunardi just edited it. He gives us a first round match with Northern Iowa. I'll take that...
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: ATWizJr on February 26, 2010, 12:12:53 PM
Quote from: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 10:53:03 AM
I know there is plenty of season left, but as of now they have Marquette as a rising #10 seed. If the season ended today we would play Maryland in the first round, and if we won we would play Duke. I think Maryland would be an interesting matchup but I think that game would be a toss-up.

  Also, if we were to play a #2 seed in the second round I wouldn't mind playing Duke. To be honest when the bracket comes out obviously its always tough to not feel the urge to pick Marquette, even though you root for them either way but I would be scared as an opposing team to play MU. Obviously nothing is set in stone but it is always interesting to contemplate match-ups.
you mean versus Northern Iowa, right?
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:18:00 PM
Quoteyou mean versus Northern Iowa, right?

QuoteLunardi just edited it. He gives us a first round match with Northern Iowa. I'll take that...

Northern Iowa would be the best we could hope for I think
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Brewtown Andy on February 26, 2010, 12:22:29 PM
Quote from: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:59:02 AM
BCS schools are protected until a 13 seed-it doesn't happen often that a BCS school nets a 13 however.

It's not an actual protection.  Does anyone really think that whoever wins the Atlantic Sun, Northeast, MAC, Southern, Big South, Ohio Valley, Summit, Sun Belt, Southland, MEAC, Big West, Big Sky, American East, Patriot, MAAC or SWAC conference titles deserve to be higher?  There's your 13, 14, 15 and 16 seeds.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:32:35 PM
Georgia was a 13 seed that year

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/preview?gid=200803200682&prov=ap
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Brewtown Andy on February 26, 2010, 12:36:42 PM
Quote from: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:32:35 PM
Georgia was a 13 seed that year

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/preview?gid=200803200682&prov=ap

And Mississippi State is a 13 in Lunardi's bracket right now.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Brewtown Andy on February 26, 2010, 12:38:09 PM
Quote from: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 12:09:32 PM
Lunardi just edited it. He gives us a first round match with Northern Iowa. I'll take that...

The idea of an NCAA tournament game between two teams that lost to DePaul is incredibly entertaining.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: MU B2002 on February 26, 2010, 12:38:36 PM
Quote from: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:32:35 PM
Georgia was a 13 seed that year

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/preview?gid=200803200682&prov=ap

Yet the link you provide says 14 seed.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:42:59 PM
QuoteYet the link you provide says 14 seed.

Thanks, its just one of those days
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: MU B2002 on February 26, 2010, 12:45:38 PM
It happens.


Is Bracketolgy down?  When I go in it is simply a blank bracket...
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: jficke13 on February 26, 2010, 12:59:14 PM
there's no such thing as BCS conferences in college basketball.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Brewtown Andy on February 26, 2010, 01:00:35 PM
Quote from: lawwarrior12 on February 26, 2010, 12:59:14 PM
there's no such thing as BCS conferences in college basketball.

And yet, those 6 conferences are the top 6 rated conferences by KenPom.

http://kenpom.com/conf.php?c=BE
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: dwaderoy2004 on February 26, 2010, 01:08:59 PM
Quote from: lawwarrior12 on February 26, 2010, 12:59:14 PM
there's no such thing as BCS conferences in college basketball.

technically, maybe.  but the 6 bcs conferences in footbal are the same 6 power, or major, conferences in college basketball.  you're just arguing semantics.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Coleman on February 26, 2010, 01:15:01 PM
Quote from: damuts222 on February 26, 2010, 12:32:35 PM
Georgia was a 13 seed that year

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/preview?gid=200803200682&prov=ap

Georgia was a 14 seed but it wasn't an at-large bid. They won their conference tournament and there was no way they would have gotten in without the auto-bid.

Perhaps a better way to state it than BCS Conference protection is that ANY at large team is very very rarely seeded worse than 13 (perhaps never), regardless of whether they come from the A-10 or the Big Ten.  14-16 is pretty much always reserved for the automatic bids. Of course, most of the at larges come from the major ("BCS" if you will) conferences.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Benny B on February 26, 2010, 02:04:27 PM
Quote from: TheButlerDidIt on February 26, 2010, 11:56:03 AM
It would have to be if 9 teams from any conference got in. There would be definite overlap then.

Perhaps, but remember, even with 9 teams in from a conference, it is still very possible to avoid a second round match-up of two teams from the same conference. 

From Mike Huguenin (not a notoriously reliable source, but he does have this correct):

"As far as other rules go, teams from the same conference hopefully won't meet until a regional final, but the NCAA has relaxed that because some conferences have six and seven bids (it's even permissible for an intraconference matchup in the second round, though that is to be avoided whenever possible). But the first three teams selected from a given conference must be in different regions."
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Aughnanure on February 26, 2010, 02:09:22 PM
Quote from: lawwarrior12 on February 26, 2010, 12:59:14 PM
there's no such thing as BCS conferences in college basketball.

I know that. Its an easy way to refer to all the high-major conferences that get the same kind of obvious favoritism in the NCAA tournament as in the BCS bowl system.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: Maryland Warrior on February 26, 2010, 03:05:38 PM

As a Maryland grad, the father of a current MU undergrad but a Warrior fan since-,oh full disclosure here-seeing  Don Kojis play on Warrior trips to the University of Detroit, the possibility of a MU/UM Tournament  match up presents the most exquisitely  joyful dilemmas of a lifetime
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on February 26, 2010, 03:34:00 PM
I honestly love that draw Lunardi has drawn up. If i was to get really cocky and change it a little i would want Northern iowa in a 11/6 match up. Then have New Mexico as the 3 and then Duke as the 2. That way we could have a great shot to atleast get to the sweet 16, then possibly knock off duke or get really lucky and have Duke get upset in the 7/10 game. This would be a great draw.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: OneMadWarrior on February 26, 2010, 03:39:45 PM
Quote from: Maryland Warrior on February 26, 2010, 03:05:38 PM
As a Maryland grad, the father of a current MU undergrad but a Warrior fan since-,oh full disclosure here-seeing  Don Kojis play on Warrior trips to the University of Detroit, the possibility of a MU/UM Tournament  match up presents the most exquisitely  joyful dilemmas of a lifetime

I'm in the same boat as you. I grew up in the DC area rooting for Terps basketball (Joe Smith Laron Profit et. al) It was bitter sweet the terps finally won teh title as by that time I was already studying at Marquette. At least Gary does it the rigth way although stickign to his principles continues to cause him to miss out on all the great talent leaving DC and Maryland (Carmelo Anthony, Kevin Durant) It woudl be nice to see.
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: LAZER on February 26, 2010, 03:59:06 PM
Quote from: OneMadWarrior on February 26, 2010, 03:39:45 PM
I'm in the same boat as you. I grew up in the DC area rooting for Terps basketball (Joe Smith Laron Profit et. al) It was bitter sweet the terps finally won teh title as by that time I was already studying at Marquette. At least Gary does it the rigth way although stickign to his principles continues to cause him to miss out on all the great talent leaving DC and Maryland (Carmelo Anthony, Kevin Durant) It woudl be nice to see.

Gary certainly does do it the right way
(//)
Title: Re: ESPN Bracketology
Post by: jficke13 on February 26, 2010, 04:31:29 PM
One of the espn insider bloggers refers to the power 6 conferences as the Power 6 Conferences.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev