http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4783699 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4783699)
At least in Jay Bilas' opinion.
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/1231/ncb_decade2_576.jpg)
Quote from: TallTitan34 on January 02, 2010, 12:52:43 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4783699 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4783699)
At least in Jay Bilas' opinion.
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/1231/ncb_decade2_576.jpg)
I've heard a lot of different opinions of this in the last few days. Some people saying the decade isn't over until 2011 starts.
http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100101/A_NEWS/1010314#STS=g3y27a3r.1b3o
That's the way I learned to count to ten.
Quote from: wildbillsb on January 02, 2010, 06:45:38 AM
That's the way I learned to count to ten.
So you consider year 2000 part of the 90's?
Yes, the year 2000 concluded the last century for me, as I count the number 10 as a signifier of the last item in a set of ten whatevers (toes, fingers, years, commandments, dollars....).
There are so many stupid things we argue about on this board. Can we just agree to not argue about this one?
Quote from: wildbillsb on January 02, 2010, 09:37:56 AM
Yes, the year 2000 concluded the last century for me, as I count the number 10 as a signifier of the last item in a set of ten whatevers (toes, fingers, years, commandments, dollars....).
I understand your math, I just think its a little confusing to call 2000 part of the 90s and not 1990
Also people, please refer to it as Twenty Ten, not Two Thousand and Ten. And if you wonder why, say the following years out loud.
1826, 1423, 1912, 1365....
I'm going with Twenty O Ten myself.