1) Louisville found a way to win (against Oral ;) )
2) Cincy CLOBBERED @ UAB today (57-64)
3) USF beat UCF
4) Depaul losing to "American" at home!?! 3 min left
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/scoreboard?d=2009-12-16&refresh=60&c=bige
Lemme say that again.
AMERICAN? #320 pomeroy, 3% chance of winning.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 08:59:22 PM
Louisville found a way to win Oral
porcini event
pitino takes on oral
she must have swallowed
Quote from: warthog-driver on December 16, 2009, 09:03:10 PM
porcini event
pitino takes on oral
she must have swallowed
actually i believe oral choaked
American 62 - Depaul 57 - FINAL
Does DePaul suck that bad? I know Mac Koshwal is out, but has the team given up?
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 09:14:37 PM
American 62 - Depaul 57 - FINAL
Does DePaul suck that bad? I know Mac Koshwal is out, but has the team given up?
No, they really do suck that bad. I think Presbyterian could beat them...maybe NJIT too. That was harsh, but they are that bad.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 08:59:22 PM
2) Cincy CLOBBERED @ UAB today (57-64)
4) Depaul losing to "American" at home!?! 3 min left
2) It was 64-47 (score correction, plus it irks me like no other when people provide a score with the lower score first... I mean, literally pains me to see it or hear it)
4) Yep. It's done. American was only 1-8, but that includes a tough 1-point lost to powerhouse Albany, so it's almost as if they came in 2-7. At least we will not be in last place this year.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 09:14:37 PM
American 62 - Depaul 57 - FINAL
Does DePaul suck that bad? I know Mac Koshwal is out, but has the team given up?
Vlad Moldoveanu, a 6'9" mid-year transfer played his first game tonight for AU, pumping in 26 points, with 8 rebounds and 4 assists--including 5-10 for three. AU lost to Maryland Eastern Shore by 7 earlier in the year. Who is Buzz bringing in mid-year to right the ship?
Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on December 16, 2009, 09:32:58 PM
Vlad Moldoveanu, a 6'9" mid-year transfer played his first game tonight for AU, pumping in 26 points, with 8 rebounds and 4 assists--including 5-10 for three. AU lost to Maryland Eastern Shore by 7 earlier in the year. Who is Buzz bringing in mid-year to right the ship?
from that line, I wish it was Vlad Moldoveanu.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 08:59:22 PM
2) Cincy CLOBBERED @ UAB today (57-64)
Quote from: Jay Bee on December 16, 2009, 09:18:04 PM
2) It was 64-47 (score correction, plus it irks me like no other when people provide a score with the lower score first... I mean, literally pains me to see it or hear it)
Thanks for the correction, not even sure what I was trying to type. As for the lower score first - generally I agree, for example, If I has said "Cincy clobbered 64-47 @ UAB today", I would have done that. Since I followed the statement completely, I (think) I chose to go with the convention of the home team score being mentioned 2nd.
Argue with the logic all you want (spiral actually likes this argument - he always puts the home team second), but it would be more clear if that was the convention.
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 16, 2009, 09:33:51 PM
from that line, I wish it was Vlad Moldoveanu.
a 6 9 manchild
solution to our nightmare
romanian dream
American would probably clobber Boston University too.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 16, 2009, 09:40:18 PM
American would probably clobber Boston University too.
au beats bu
if they were to play today
bring back pitino
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2009, 09:36:23 PM
Thanks for the correction, not even sure what I was trying to type. As for the lower score first - generally I agree, for example, If I has said "Cincy clobbered 64-47 @ UAB today", I would have done that. Since I followed the statement completely, I (think) I chose to go with the convention of the home team score being mentioned 2nd.
Argue with the logic all you want (spiral actually likes this argument - he always puts the home team second), but it would be more clear if that was the convention.
My (strong!) preference would be, "2) Cincy CLOBBERED @ UAB today (65-57 [sic])"... you already indicated they were beat, you already explained who the home team was.. so I struggle with the thought that stating the higher score first is an attack on logic...
I understand standard formatting (for example, scrolling sports scores can have the visiting teams to the left, home team on the right... scoreboards can stick to one way or the other).. but in spoken or free format written communication... leading with the lower score FREAKS ME OUT. (I tend to worry about only the most important things in life)
I wonder what spiral would do in the case of a neutral site game, if he knew who was the designated 'home team' wearing the 'home jerseys' for the game.
Cats take out North Florida by 40.