I agree with Bilas, I think Marquette can go really far... in a one game scenario we can beat anyone, also lose to anyone. For all those who don't have ESPN insider, the Marquette section is posted below.
http://insider.espn.go.com/ncb/insider/columns/story?columnist=bilas_jay&id=2750725
Marquette
Why? This is a team I tabbed with this label in the preseason, and it is still in position, even though none of Marquette's offensive numbers would suggest a run deep in the Tournament. This is not a great shooting team and not a team with a great inside game. It is, however, a tough and together team with outstanding guard play. The Golden Eagles are a much improved passing and handling team that has done a better job of late of taking good shots and attacking off the dribble. Marquette is shooting better as a result and shooting more free throws. Dominic James, Jerel McNeal and Wesley Matthews are special guards, and no guard trio in the nation works as hard as they do. McNeal is an outstanding defender who gets more deflections than a hockey goalie. James can take over a game with his speed and explosiveness and Matthews does everything and lays his body on the line every game. With improved play from Dan Fitzgerald, David Cubillan and Ousmane Barro, Marquette has more options and versatility.
Why Not? The Golden Eagles are not consistent shooters, and in a tournament setting, the percentages suggest that will catch up with them. This is an outstanding offensive rebounding team, but in a one-game scenario, Marquette is held hostage by how it shoots the ball more than any other team on this list.
Most Indispensable Player: Dominic James. Marquette needs his energy and explosive scoring, as well as his dynamic leadership.
Funny....
Bilas never says anything anyone doesn't already know...many of the posters on this board could do his (and other commentators) job. However, we are confined to our office walls and door and he gets to jetset to every national televised game....life just isn't fair. :D
QuoteBilas never says anything anyone doesn't already know
Maybe, but he says it about every team in the country. Quick, give me a break down of the relative strengths and weaknesses of Nebraska this year...I bet Bilas could do it, but I bet you cannot. That's why he gets to jet set around the country.
I still think Hayward is a wildcard. I dont think he has reached his potential yet. Hopefully, it will start to happen in Late Feb.
Barro, Fitz, Cubillian, and Burke have picked up their games. Lott & Trend need to find their roles, but these things tend to work themselves out in a long dance. The nice thing is that Barro, Fitz, Hayward, Cube and Burke will all be better next year.
Quote from: mviale on February 03, 2007, 11:01:42 AM
I still think Hayward is a wildcard. I dont think he has reached his potential yet. Hopefully, it will start to happen in Late Feb.
I fully expect Cubillan and Hayward (and heck, even Trend - early reports were that he could shoot the 3 ball well) to be an important part of Marquette's NCAA run this year (ala Novak, Chapman and Bradley in 03) ;D
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 03, 2007, 11:17:45 AM
Quote from: mviale on February 03, 2007, 11:01:42 AM
I still think Hayward is a wildcard. I dont think he has reached his potential yet. Hopefully, it will start to happen in Late Feb.
I fully expect Cubillan and Hayward (and heck, even Trend - early reports were that he could shoot the 3 ball well) to be an important part of Marquette's NCAA run this year (ala Novak, Chapman and Bradley in 03) ;D
I watched the MU vs Kent 2003 game last night. An important player for MU will be Barro. In the 2003 game RJax absolutely detstroyed Kent all night long. Does MU have that player this year? The second most dominant player was Jackson. He brought it all game long.
Quote from: State on February 02, 2007, 09:07:33 PM
Funny....
Bilas never says anything anyone doesn't already know...many of the posters on this board could do his (and other commentators) job. However, we are confined to our office walls and door and he gets to jetset to every national televised game....life just isn't fair. :D
Thought that about pretty much every commentator, my friends say I take in ESPN with osmosis, and that I just have stats stored everywhere in my head, about every sport, mostly college basketball. Maybe I should change my major