MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: MUWeb7 on March 01, 2009, 01:02:09 PM

Title: That was a foul.
Post by: MUWeb7 on March 01, 2009, 01:02:09 PM
Last shot...

Edit: After watching it again...I may have jumped the gun. It was close, and hard to tell...   :-[

Either way...bring on PITT. Go MU.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Tommy Brice for Coach on March 01, 2009, 01:03:29 PM
agreed. we got hosed on that play
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Thomas' Danish Delight on March 01, 2009, 01:04:15 PM
NO crap!  HOW THE unnatural carnal knowledge WAS THAT NOT A FOUL?!?!

WHAT!

THE!

F-WORD?!@?!?!/!

seriously though...gettin that outta my system, we played a hell of a game AT Louisville MINUS one of our best guys AND with our best player having the on of the worst games of his college career.

Hell of a fight, men.  Hell of a fight.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Detfan23 on March 01, 2009, 01:04:29 PM
Guy drove right through him, how do they miss that call.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: g0ldmember42 on March 01, 2009, 01:05:56 PM
I don't think they get that call in Freedom Hall at the end of the game. It sucked, but I tend to believe the refs will look the other way unless its blatant/intentional.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: MU_Warrior44 on March 01, 2009, 01:06:17 PM
Total crap on the non-call. Such a frustrating loss just because we were close despite the way we were shooting.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Ahoya06 on March 01, 2009, 01:06:39 PM
I agree. Foul all the way. But why did we give up so fast after that?
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 01, 2009, 01:07:53 PM
I don't mind losing .. But I do mind losing with a HORRIBLE no-call on the last shot.  That was freaking preposterous.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Moonboots on March 01, 2009, 01:08:46 PM
Just rewinded and watched it again two or three times... not as blatant as I thought, but the UL defender left his feet and landed on Wes, who did lean a little bit.  That's a call you have to make.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Thomas' Danish Delight on March 01, 2009, 01:08:57 PM
Quote from: g0ldmember42 on March 01, 2009, 01:05:56 PM
I don't think they get that call in Freedom Hall at the end of the game. It sucked, but I tend to believe the refs will look the other way unless its blatant/intentional.

how was that not blatant/intentional?!?!

dude...totally got surprise buttsexed on that one.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: MUEng92 on March 01, 2009, 01:09:18 PM
I just watched the replay.  There wasn't nearly as much contact as I thought there was.  Plus, the ref was not where he would have been able to see it anyway.  The contact was all due to Wes sticking his hip out
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Big Papi on March 01, 2009, 01:10:31 PM
Are you kidding me?????  Take off the homer glasses.  That was not a foul.  THe Louisville player jumped past Matthews and Matthews blantantly leaned towards the Louisville player.  Not a foul.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: NavinRJohnson on March 01, 2009, 01:10:52 PM
I hat complaining about refs, but much like the other night, with about 4 min left MU had the team foul advantage 10-4. I haven't looked, but I believe it ended up 11-11
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Thomas' Danish Delight on March 01, 2009, 01:12:01 PM
Quote from: mufanatic on March 01, 2009, 01:10:31 PM
Are you kidding me?????  Take off the homer glasses.  That was not a foul.  THe Louisville player jumped past Matthews and Matthews blantantly leaned towards the Louisville player.  Not a foul.

-1
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: CTWarrior on March 01, 2009, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: Ahoya06 on March 01, 2009, 01:06:39 PM
I agree. Foul all the way. But why did we give up so fast after that?
Agree, a foul 100%.  

Agree we shouldn't have given up.

Finally, instead of trying to draw the foul, Wes should have just let the defender go by and take the uncontested three.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Moonboots on March 01, 2009, 01:12:54 PM
Quote from: mufanatic on March 01, 2009, 01:10:31 PM
Are you kidding me?????  Take off the homer glasses.  That was not a foul.  THe Louisville player jumped past Matthews and Matthews blantantly leaned towards the Louisville player.  Not a foul.

Oh, there was contact.  Wes wouldn't have had to lean for the UL defender to hit him, and leaning in actually hurt his case for the foul in my eyes.  He may have gotten the call if he went straight up and still got hit.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: MR.HAYWARD on March 01, 2009, 01:23:54 PM
one of a couple of big plays down the stretch lazars moving screen sort of a chickin crap call at that point by the same ref, negated a 3 by rel to cut it to one.  Then the loserville rebound off the missed Ft was huge.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: ecompt on March 01, 2009, 01:27:05 PM
actually, that might have been the one time when Jerel might have thought of putting the ball up instead of kicking it out again. I thought he might have drawn a foul if he had continued to the basket. Whatever. We played hard throughout, especially on D.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: downtown85 on March 01, 2009, 01:27:43 PM
Quote from: g0ldmember42 on March 01, 2009, 01:05:56 PM
I don't think they get that call in Freedom Hall at the end of the game. It sucked, but I tend to believe the refs will look the other way unless its blatant/intentional.

but Georgetown gets the call at the Bradley Center last year when DJ fouled the Georgetown player.  Life is not fair.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Brewtown Andy on March 01, 2009, 01:28:00 PM
Quote from: mufanatic on March 01, 2009, 01:10:31 PM
Are you kidding me?????  Take off the homer glasses.  That was not a foul.  THe Louisville player jumped past Matthews and Matthews blantantly leaned towards the Louisville player.  Not a foul.

I'm absolutely fine with refs swallowing the whistle on plays like that, regardless of when in the game it is.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Brewtown Andy on March 01, 2009, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: downtown85 on March 01, 2009, 01:27:43 PM
but Georgetown gets the call at the Bradley Center last year when DJ fouled the Georgetown player.  Life is not fair.

Whatisname wasn't leaning into DJ trying to draw the foul.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: VegasWarrior77 on March 01, 2009, 01:31:10 PM
Quote from: PXILibero2 on March 01, 2009, 01:08:46 PM
Just rewinded and watched it again two or three times... not as blatant as I thought, but the UL defender left his feet and landed on Wes, who did lean a little bit.  That's a call you have to make.
+1
At first I thought it was a clear cut foul.  Then I watched it a few times again.  The only contact would have been initiated by Wes as he kicked out his legs.  It was close though!
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: CTWarrior on March 01, 2009, 01:32:17 PM
Quote from: Brewtown Andy on March 01, 2009, 01:28:00 PM
I'm absolutely fine with refs swallowing the whistle on plays like that, regardless of when in the game it is.

I said earlier in this thread that it was a foul, and it was in the sense that they usually call that one, but I really don't have a problem with the ref not calling it.  More importantly, it was unnecessary for Wes to try to draw that foul.  If he let the guy go by, he had an uncontested three.  I know we were down four, but how likely was a four point play there?
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: muhoops1 on March 01, 2009, 01:40:42 PM
It was not a foul.  I watched it ten times.  The defender ran past him.  He initiated contact, but it was incidental @ best.  The shot almost went in too.  It was an oddly officiated game.  A lot of contact/very physical and then the "moving screen" call.
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: MUWeb7 on March 01, 2009, 01:43:27 PM
Quote from: CTWarrior on March 01, 2009, 01:32:17 PM
I said earlier in this thread that it was a foul, and it was in the sense that they usually call that one, but I really don't have a problem with the ref not calling it.  More importantly, it was unnecessary for Wes to try to draw that foul.  If he let the guy go by, he had an uncontested three.  I know we were down four, but how likely was a four point play there?

Pretty much sums up what I think about it...
Title: Re: That was a foul.
Post by: Buzz Williams' Spillproof Chiclets Cup on March 03, 2009, 11:42:24 AM
"5....4....3...2...1...Let her fly!......In and out....yea, well I was fouled..."
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8pq63buf6oM/RdShvnSabSI/AAAAAAAAAK0/f2S9nas1_AM/s400/Hoosiers3.jpg)
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev