MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: muarmy81 on January 26, 2009, 08:16:33 PM

Title: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: muarmy81 on January 26, 2009, 08:16:33 PM
Can people actually admit we're pretty good now?
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: rocky_warrior on January 26, 2009, 08:25:09 PM
Well lets see....if we go on after this to beat GT, we still won't have played a BE team (other than PC) with a winning record.

Then we only have to face DePaul and USF.  Gosh.  We could be 10-0 in the big east without playing any "good" teams.  Hah!  Whoops....sorry...I'm looking ahead  ;D
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: chapman on January 26, 2009, 08:27:50 PM
A lot of 9-9 and 10-8 predictions that need to be revised. 
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: MUUWUWM on January 26, 2009, 08:31:00 PM
hmmmm  this win wasn't really special...let me explain.

Its like a bottle of ketchup that your wife is struggling to open and can't.

So she hands it to you which you open effortlessly.

Upon handing it back to her she comments how she loosened it up for you.

Its still not a good win, Notre Dame is overrated and was previously softened up for us in their last 3 games.

Thats basically how it will be spun I guess.

Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: HomeCourtAdvantage on January 26, 2009, 08:33:52 PM
I don't like the argument that the teams we've faced in the Big East are a paltry 14-27 in Big East play.  But let's remember that 7 of those loses were to Marquette.
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: mosarsour on January 26, 2009, 08:34:25 PM
Quote from: MUUWUWM on January 26, 2009, 08:31:00 PM
hmmmm  this win wasn't really special...let me explain.

Its like a bottle of ketchup that your wife is struggling to open and can't.

So she hands it to you which you open effortlessly.

Upon handing it back to her she comments how she loosened it up for you.

Its still not a good win, Notre Dame is overrated and was previously softened up for us in their last 3 games.

Thanks for the downer, Debbie! This was a huge win no matter how you slice it!
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: rocky_warrior on January 26, 2009, 08:41:54 PM
Quote from: mosarsour on January 26, 2009, 08:34:25 PM
Thanks for the downer, Debbie! This was a huge win no matter how you slice it!

Dude, it's sarcasm!  The thread is titled "so how do we downplay this win?"  :D
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: MUUWUWM on January 26, 2009, 08:44:14 PM
LMAO...thanks Rock!!! :D
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: Sweenz on January 26, 2009, 08:48:28 PM
Exactly... when people say the combined record is 14-27... we gave 7 of the losses... a more appropriate measure would be 14-20 in other Big East games...

But if we were to be 0-7 in Big East play, those teams would be 21-20... and it would be a tougher schedule...

Sports analysts always point to combined records even in NFL or college basketball... but when a big % of the losses are attributed to the team you are diminishing as having a soft schedule, maybe there is a reason the teams have so many losses... the lose to the good team with the soft schedule



Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: tower912 on January 26, 2009, 08:52:46 PM
The Gottliebs of the world will downplay it.   For any MU fan, there is no possible way to downplay a win in South Bend.   The only thing that approaches this for pure sweetness is a win in Madison. 
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: pbiflyer on January 26, 2009, 09:41:53 PM
We couldn't even beat a bad Tennessee team and a mediocre Dayton team on nuetral courts. The hiring process was flawed!  
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: Daniel on January 26, 2009, 09:45:39 PM
Gottleib will say, "So Marquette beats another unranked team - big deal.  Still pretenders."
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: LON on January 26, 2009, 09:48:44 PM
Quote from: tower912 on January 26, 2009, 08:52:46 PM
The Gottliebs of the world will downplay it.   For any MU fan, there is no possible way to downplay a win in South Bend.   The only thing that approaches this for pure sweetness is a win in Madison. 

That's because he's too busy stealing your credit card to actually watch a game
Title: Re: so how do we downplay this win?
Post by: chapman on January 26, 2009, 09:58:49 PM
Quote from: MUUWUWM on January 26, 2009, 08:31:00 PM
hmmmm  this win wasn't really special...let me explain.

Its like a bottle of ketchup that your wife is struggling to open and can't.

So she hands it to you which you open effortlessly.

Upon handing it back to her she comments how she loosened it up for you.

Its still not a good win, Notre Dame is overrated and was previously softened up for us in their last 3 games.

Thats basically how it will be spun I guess.



Though the pre-game spin was that Notre Dame would give everything they had, they needed it so much more than Marquette did...  

The way I look at it, if this team is a bottom-feeder in the conference:

Providence 6-1
Villanova 4-2
WVU 4-2
Cincinnati 4-3
Notre Dame 4-4

Not our problem either that this big game as well as two big games vs. Georgetown aren't "big" anymore because these teams dropped some games.  Pretty soon Syracuse will be in the same boat.  Actually, losing to GT, Louisville by dougle digits, and Pitt by double digits leaves Cuse's best win a home win against ND.  UConn also has possibly less legitimacy to its schedule since the two are very similar except they LOST to Georgetown at home already.  Funny how Cuse's win at home against ND and Uconn's win at ND is landmark but we've played a team that is currently dead in the water two days later...Will anyone be legitimate by the time they face us?
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev