MU at #26, ouch.
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28116552/
Illinois at #14. Feel like you need a National Championship to be that high...
I'll take some comfort in knowing that we are THE BEST from the rest!! ;D
Quote from: SonofPianoMan on January 12, 2009, 05:23:31 PM
MU at #26, ouch.
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28116552/
It's MSNBC, nothing more need be said.
Yet another thing that MSNBC is wrong about.
The cheerleaders slideshow was informational... or at least, moreso than the rankings. UCLA below Kansas?
msnbc didn't seem to know much about politics, what makes you surprised they'd know nothing about basketball either?
Quote from: MUWarriors06 on January 12, 2009, 08:32:59 PM
msnbc didn't seem to know much about politics, what makes you surprised they'd know nothing about basketball either?
or sports in general
Keith Olbermann probably did the rankings, and we all know what a dirtbag he is. He's one of the jerks who's ponying up $2,500 a ticket to watch his beloved Yankees next year.
Almost time for you boys to head over to some political forum. All that matters is the AP, ESPN, and RPI anyways.
Considering their gripe is lack of conference Crown's I'd like to cite ND and their lack of Conference titles as well. People forget there used to be plenty of independents out there.
I think I may have a bigger problem with UCLA at #4. Why do I get the sense that the guy who put that together is probably about 30 years old?
I tend to agree this guy may be 30 years old. But, if Marquette is 26th, including a run during the 70's when the great John Wooden UCLA teams were the ONLY program with a better winning percentage than MU, how do St. Johns and Temple outrank us when their heyday was even before that?