Kolek planning to go pro
Hilarious stuff, TS.No, he never said Luke was terrible. He only said, Luke fischer the worst player in the big eastI never get why people lie about what they said when finding proof of what they said is so easy nowadays.
Sacar is a fine rebounder. His defensive rebound percentage was poor because he was usually guarding on the perimeter. His offensive rebounding percentage was only behind the three posts and Cain.
He is a guard playing the 3, weak rebounder. To small. Rather have Cain, Morrow and a center in there then Sacar. Look around the Big Eastlast year, he was one of the worst threes out of the 10 schools. Martin, Thomas, Strus. Diallo, Ahmed, Desi, Bridges, Bluiett, all better thanSacar in all facets of there game. Maybe better than Gerogetowns 3, not sure who that was. Needs to play guard next year.
In defense of Sand-Knit, while that was annoying at the time he was able to let it go as soon as Luke graduated and was actually one of the more positive posters this season.Unlike some other posters...
Terrible never used once Worst defensive player in BE, in retrospect may have been accurate
Not matts night still 100x the warrior of our other center Oh nice screen fischer as i type Hirrible horrible player WasteFisher is simply terrible n hurts usPlaying an away game when things arent going well doesnt help
Bolded for your viewing pleasure. March 17, 2017But to be fair, you also called him a lot of worse things than "Hirrible"
Where he stacks up against other 3's in the BE is completely irrelevant.
This only proves that he called Fischer "simply terrible"So Sandy never really called him just plain ol' "terrible" without it being simple. Get the difference?Again, why lie? Just own it, man.All of us eff up occasionally but far too few of us are willing to say, "Yeah, my bad."I mean, the guy called Fischer the very worst player in the entire Big East, but "terrible never used once." First, that's worse defense than Fischer ever played. Second, it was a lie.And yeah, Sandy has been supportive of Wojo in recent weeks. He did completely lose his shyte after the St. John's loss, starting a thread with an almost unreadable, single-paragraph diatribe. It was filled with misspelled words and cliches, and he concluded: Its pathetic and I will no longer defend Wojo. https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=55600.msg989407#msg989407I'm sure Wojo is heartbroken.
LolSimply horrible statement it’s everything
All that matters is whether or not he's the best option for MU at the 3
True, but if he's the 8-10th best in the Big East and also the best option for MU, that's not necessarily a good thing. So it matters, and it doesn't. It is... AND it isn't.
Reminds me of a black Jerry West, hey?
Not good and terrible are not the same.Last year Sacar sans 1 game was not good. Next two years barring major improvements in defensive rebounding and shooting he will play less. If he improves in those two areas specifically and all areas in general he will have moved the needle from not good towards good and will contest for more playing time. Pretty simple but a long way to go.
If his point is that MU needs to upgrade its talent at the SF position... fine. But in the context of playing time, all that matters is how he fits into the lineup and how he stacks up against other SF's on MU's roster.
just..... asking...... why....... you......... do........ that....... burger........?Your points are good and interesting. Seriously, why the format?