Scholarship table
I get the feeling you'd be calling it comprehensive if this was Waukesha county.
Well, there you go people. You're on your own. https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/evers-administration-wont-pursue-new-covid-19-restrictions-amid-impasse-with-gop/article_86186768-a9a4-5ff2-947c-db0caeaf9767.htmlI don't understand the "rule making" process here. I would have imagined the rule would be written and either accepted, re-written, or rejected by the legislature, like any legislation.Our state and the country has taken a breathtaking fall from civility and common values and purpose.
The abject failure of Wisconsin leadership on both sides of the aisle is appalling. The election of 2010 still resonates a decade later and the citizens of Wisconsin are the ones that pay the price. We’re a generation away from any sense of political normalcy in this once great state.
Didn't Evers already make a rule for the state? Like Evers or not, it is one side only that has declared that there will be no rules. We know that if he tries anything else, Vos and Fitgerald will just go to the court and have it overturned.With a minority of votes statewide, R's will continue to have veto-proof control of the legislature. There will be no change at any time in the foreseeable future due to extreme gerrymandering.
Both sider-ism at its finest.One side had a plan. The other side had none and destroyed the first plan with nothing to replace it. Does that make them equal in your eyes?
The problem with looking at Wisconsin's governance is one where we're viewing it through the lens of our own mos maiorum. When we "why aren't they doing what we expect a legislature to do?" or "why is the supreme court as nakedly political as it is?" we're testing the behavior of some of the players of a game who've observed that violating the the mos maiorum rules of the game have no consequence against the expectation that they do abide by those rules.
Per the DHS website, there are 128 covid patients in the ICU statewide. 380 total hospitalizations.
In this instance, I deplore the republican actions of the past 90 days. I deplored the democratic officials that ran to Illinois after Walker got elected. It set the precedent that continues today in its pettiness
i really hate politics and the games. So much easier when i was younger and had no clue what was going on except that Nancy told me to Just Say No to drugs
Because one county's laissez faire approach to COVID can have negative consequences for surrounding counties.
Replace county with state, would the same not be true? Should all of the states adhere to the same standards that California or New York?Not trying to be contrarian, looking for a reasonable approach to take.
I'd agree .. that a regional approach is the right one. I'd divide the state into regions .. somewhere between 5-10, but fewer = better.And I'd have the county health departments inside the region agree to and submit plans to the state health department // or I'd have the state health dept come up with X "stages" of openness that the regions can choose from.Seems .. reasonable.
Because people travel between cities and counties much more often than they do between states.
Except for the borders of course