Scholarship table
You’d think people would understand this by now. But nope!
So, if you are in grammar school or high school and live with someone with 2 or co-morbidities, stay home and school virtually. If you are a teacher with 2 or more (or you’re living with someone who fits that description) stay home and teach virtually. Everybody else (vast majority), back in the pool?
And what should families who have 2 working parents and can’t afford to have day care or nannies take care of their kids after school do? Don’t send them to grandma or grandpa.Sometimes people have difficulties you may not.
Why 2 or more co-morbidities?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2770250More great news!! What a day!!Let’s get these kids all back in school full face to face, follow the science my fellow scoopers!! Listen to the eXpERts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
94% of deaths have happened in people with 2+ per CDC
Did you read what the authors said the study means?Meaning The findings suggest that prevention of both COVID-19 and seasonal influenza in US children is prudent and urgent for the well-being of this population.[/i]————————-So if the preventing Covid is “prudent and urgent,“ how do you read that as encouraging parents to send their kids back to school?
Since the authors suggest it is both prudent and urgent to protect against Covid and seasonal influenza are you suggesting we should never send our kids back to school during flu season? If that’s your stance fine. If your stance is we shouldn’t for Covid but we should for influenza you’re then a hypocrite. Based off the science of course.
We have never had Covid and influenza at the same time before. Understand the context.
Two viruses that pose next to zero risk to kids happening at the same time.....gulp!!!!!!
When are you going to learn that it’s not simply a ‘die/not die’ dichotomy with this illness? There is plenty of really nasty stuff that can happen short of dying.
Answer the simple question I posed a couple of posts back: If prevention is “prudent and urgent,” how do you interpret that as encouraging parents to send their kids to school?Just a simple answer.
And when are you going to learn there is a lot of nasty stuff happening to kids today because of the unnecessary isolation. The isolation cause a bunch of boomers want to see the grandkids without worrying about the risk of asymptomatic spread.
Even more preventative measures with the mask wearing then what we preach during flu season to combat this duuuaaaalll threat. You good with that?
I didn’t see that in the paper. Is that your professional interpretation, doctor?And it’s preventive, not preventative.
I get it. When are you going to answer the question about the paper that you posted, and which I have asked twice now?(Hint: the authors are not encouraging parents to send back their kids back to school.)
And the grammar/spell check police are back!! Sure sign your hole is now too deep.
I was simply trying to help so you don’t screw up the word next time.I get that you want to interpret every paper that comes out as a green light to get back to normal (but with masks), but that is not what the science is pointing to. Sorry if that ruins your day.You can have the last word. You’re welcome.