Scholarship table
It was not an example of great coaching on the fly...
The fact that you think that's why you have been repeatedly banned from Scoop shows you will never, ever, learn a damn thing. But I guess telling yourself a lie, and hilariously painting yourself as a persecuted "alpha"...I guess it gets you through the day.
Did I ever say Chartouny was as good of a decoy as Markus? The only thing that matters is that Joe was good enough of a decoy to make the play work. He drew a Creighton defender away from Sam and Joey so one of them could make the shot.I can understand why you would switch Joe and Markus. Makes complete sense. It also makes complete sense to have your best passer make the inbounds pass in this situation. There's more than one way to skin a Blue Jay. I don't understand why you feel like there's only one acceptable strategy, especially when the strategy we used worked.
Markus had 9 turnovers in the Creighton game. He's hardly our "best passer," but he clearly is our best offensive threat.The fact some people here are trying to suggest there was a high degree of difficulty on the inbounds pass Markus had to execute is laughable. But yes, Sam made the bucket from 25 feet having to retreat further from the basket due to the play design and chosen alignment. But it worked out. It's just amusing that the biggest Wojo fanboys complain about those who have been critical never being able to give him any credit (which is not true), yet when confronted with a clear situation that was NOT good coaching, they pretzel logic their way into suggesting it was good coaching.
Amusing indeed.
It is. The depths of your mancrush on Wojo is funny AF. I'd understand it if the guy had a track record here like Buzz, but he's yet to win an NCAA game 4 years in and has us at 34 in the magical Year 5, and some of you are celebrating as if we've arrived.But, to be fair, that is a function of the underwhelming first 4 years.
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
Stay in your lane pud. You aren't a moderator here. Everyone knows why I got banned - being critical of Wojo and Derrick Wilson - and not relenting on that despite the heard mentality of the most prolific posters here trying to shout my viewpoint down.
Everyone knows -- except the obnoxious, argumentative pud.
Says the guy who is an obnoxious, argumentative, pud. Question for you pud: As a self-described big deal at 34,000 person firm who "runs your firm's entire portfolio of business with 2 of the Fortune 5 companies," how is it that you have ample time over the course of the workday to participate on Scoop? (No doubt though, you've been a good yes man over the years and tip of the cap to you there.)
I have posted elsewhere and I will post it again. Just as I was not ready to fire Wojo after IU or Kansas, I am not ready to build a statue for him now. What you call a mancrush, I call patience. I don't think Wojo is reinventing the game. I know the angry little boy look he had on the sidelines during his early seasons gave me pause. But, the powers that be wanted the anti-Buzz and they got him. Long term build, avoiding JUCO's, minimizing off court issues, choirboy image. What has Wojo done that is contrary to that? So, here we are in year 5, 14-3, top 15, and you are arguing that Wojo sucks because the rebuild didn't happen as fast as you thought it should, that he wasn't an instant hall of famer, and most recently, he ran an end-game out of bounds play (that WORKED!) that you didn't like. But everyone who showed patience and didn't call for his firing is a fanboy with a mancrush. Everyone else is the problem. With our 'heard' mentality.
Honest question, do you know what being a "yes man" means? You've now used it on two different people and in both cases you've completely contradicted yourself in the very same post.Argumentative pud; yes man.One of three Wojo slurpers remaining; yes man.I'm 100% certain you don't know what a yes man is.
"One of three Wojo slurpers remaining?" What does that even mean?
You tell me. According to you it's impossible to continue defending Wojo and the number of people trying to do so is down to 3, including me. Yet I'm a yes man. Direct contradictions.But good deflection.Do you know what a yes man is? You've used it on 2 people that you claim are the opposite of yes men.
MUScoop's mods, myself especially, maintain a lot of "institutional amnesia" whereby we rarely ban people and when we do, we rapidly forget who or why -- somewhat on purpose. The Banned come back after a time, and we let them because (first and foremost) Arbys, and secondly, we hope for the best. We hope for the best of Marquetters to step forward and behave like decent humans. Scoop is home to many chances.Floorslapper just used up his latest chance. Beef and Cheddar goes to the first user who can identify his next account name.