MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: fjm on February 01, 2020, 12:55:28 AM

Title: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: fjm on February 01, 2020, 12:55:28 AM
O/U Is 147.

If Howard is out, I’m gonna hammer the U.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: geps on February 01, 2020, 06:56:14 AM
Hmmm I believe that Providence fiasco had us -8. We'll be fine.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: TheREALwrk on February 01, 2020, 07:43:11 AM
Where are you seeing this? Not seeing a line anywhere. And no Markus news.

Don't think they'll put one out til news on his availability comes out.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: MU82 on February 01, 2020, 07:59:19 AM
O/U Is 147.

If Howard is out, I’m gonna hammer the U.

I never bet on Marquette games, but I like that U bet, fjm. Makes a lot of sense.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 01, 2020, 09:02:06 AM
That is a lot of points.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: muguru on February 01, 2020, 09:06:20 AM
That is a lot of points.

You really think so?? Idk...that's like the equivalent of a 76-71 game for example. It's not like DePaul is a defensive juggernaut. I can see 148 points total.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: MU82 on February 01, 2020, 09:26:30 AM
If Markus plays, I wouldn't touch that under. He can score 40+ by himself against a less-than-stellar defensive team. But we're a pretty good defensive team, and if Markus is out we definitely could have trouble scoring, so I could see the under being attractive.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: Warrior1969 on February 01, 2020, 09:31:33 AM
No way MU is -7 without MH.  Vegas knows he is playing.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: brewcity77 on February 01, 2020, 09:32:09 AM
If Howard plays, I like the over. DePaul plays at a fast pace. They have played 7 games against teams that are top-100 (like Marquette) in tempo and averaged 77.6 possessions in those games. Marquette has played 6 games at 77+ possessions and all have gone over 147.

If both teams play up-tempo like they prefer, should be enough possessions to get the over, at least if Howard is playing.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: TheREALwrk on February 01, 2020, 09:42:00 AM
Howard LIKELY , per Evan Daniels.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on February 01, 2020, 09:44:23 AM
Go for the sandwich.  DePaul to cover, Marquette to win.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 01, 2020, 09:49:56 AM
You really think so?? Idk...that's like the equivalent of a 76-71 game for example. It's not like DePaul is a defensive juggernaut. I can see 148 points total.

Was referring to Marquette giving 7 points.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: MU82 on February 01, 2020, 12:17:50 PM
FWIW (nothing really), Seton Hall was favored by 8 over X.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on February 01, 2020, 03:30:21 PM
Go for the sandwich.  DePaul to cover, Marquette to win.

Hope you played it!
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on February 01, 2020, 03:35:20 PM
That went perfectly for me.

I took Depaul getting the points. We got the W.

Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: tower912 on February 01, 2020, 03:40:28 PM
And the under?
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: BM1090 on February 01, 2020, 03:46:14 PM
That went perfectly for me.

I took Depaul getting the points. We got the W.

I took Xavier +8 and MU live -1.5 at the under 4 timeout.

That Moore three was a bit stressful at the end!
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on February 01, 2020, 03:47:44 PM
And the under?

What I use had it at 148.5 so the Moore miss kept the under the victor.

I only bet the spread tho.
Title: Re: MU -7 vs DePaul
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on February 01, 2020, 03:50:47 PM
I took Xavier +8 and MU live -1.5 at the under 4 timeout.

That Moore three was a bit stressful at the end!

Ha close call.

I always bet our opponent. Which will take a minor sting off losses that way

Unless its the Butler game...double kick to the nuts. I took the points and Butler didnt cover while winning.