collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: For the Anti-Martin people  (Read 15979 times)

WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #50 on: March 31, 2014, 03:46:29 PM »
As I said in another thread, the biggest misconception is that Martin did it mostly with Pearl's players.  There were only 2 holdovers this year from the Pearl era.  Also, Martin signed 2 5* recruits in 3 years at UT.  How many did Williams sign while at Marquette?

1 in 6 years

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #51 on: March 31, 2014, 03:46:45 PM »
Sharpie this one in, people. This is the basic line Chicos will use for the next six years about Martin.

Done Deal.

Do you think it is a legitimate question to ask about a coach who has 1 NCAA bid in his 6 years and that was this year as a play-in?

Seems legit question to me.  Others may differ.

If anything, I'm giving the SID and others prep time when these questions come up.


WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #52 on: March 31, 2014, 03:48:42 PM »
VolFan, in YOUR opinion do u think Martin is an upgrade over Brent?

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #53 on: March 31, 2014, 03:49:08 PM »
Sharpie this one in, people. This is the basic line Chicos will use for the next six years about Martin.

Done Deal.

indeed.

Henry Sugar

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2007
  • There are no shortcuts
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #54 on: March 31, 2014, 03:50:52 PM »
Do you think it is a legitimate question to ask about a coach who has 1 NCAA bid in his 6 years and that was this year as a play-in?

Seems legit question to me.  Others may differ.

If anything, I'm giving the SID and others prep time when these questions come up.


Sure, it's a legit question. One that I am looking forward to you repeating for years.
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #55 on: March 31, 2014, 03:59:56 PM »
Do you think it is a legitimate question to ask about a coach who has 1 NCAA bid in his 6 years and that was this year as a play-in?

Seems legit question to me.  Others may differ.

If anything, I'm giving the SID and others prep time when these questions come up.



Context is your friend.

At Missouri State, he took over a program that has one tourney appearance since 1992 and played in a conference that typically gets a couple of bids at best.
At Tennessee, he took over a team that had lost 7 of its top 10 players, including five of the top six scorers, from the prior season.
Neither situation was ripe for immediate success.

Would you prefer a coach who got one tourney appearance in his first seven seasons (Howland)?

Litehouse

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2211
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #56 on: March 31, 2014, 04:04:34 PM »
Wow, you are really intrigued huh?
I gotta admit, I'm kinda warming up to Martin.

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #57 on: March 31, 2014, 04:06:41 PM »
VolFan, in YOUR opinion do u think Martin is an upgrade over Brent?

I don't know a lot about Williams, but I would say they are in the same tier.  I always thought Williams sideline antics were a little over the top and I was surprised to read he only got one 5* in 6 years, but he seemed to be an above-average X's and O's coach.  You will get no sideline antics with Martin, which some won't like probably, and he has often been accused of not being a great X's and O's coach and not good at making adjustments.  However, his players would run through a wall for him and he was a really good player at Purdue, so I think that carries a lot of credibility with 18-20 year-old kids.

RyanConroy

  • Guest
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #58 on: March 31, 2014, 04:08:41 PM »
1 in 6 years

Brent Williams: 1 five-star recruit. 9 four-star recruits.

Cuonzo Martin: 2 five-star recruits (one handed to him). 1 four-star recruit.

Not a contest.

WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #59 on: March 31, 2014, 04:09:31 PM »
I don't know a lot about Williams, but I would say they are in the same tier.  I always thought Williams sideline antics were a little over the top and I was surprised to read he only got one 5* in 6 years, but he seemed to be an above-average X's and O's coach.  You will get no sideline antics with Martin, which some won't like probably, and he has often been accused of not being a great X's and O's coach and not good at making adjustments.  However, his players would run through a wall for him and he was a really good player at Purdue, so I think that carries a lot of credibility with 18-20 year-old kids.

Im sorry but Brent and X's and O's dont go together

WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #60 on: March 31, 2014, 04:10:42 PM »
Brent Williams: 1 five-star recruit. 9 four-star recruits.

Cuonzo Martin: 2 five-star recruits (one handed to him). 1 four-star recruit.

Not a contest.

How many of those 9 four stars panned out? Riiiight

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #61 on: March 31, 2014, 04:10:49 PM »
Im sorry but Brent and X's and O's dont go together

That was definitely an outsider's perspective of him.

RyanConroy

  • Guest
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #62 on: March 31, 2014, 04:11:48 PM »
How many of those 9 four stars panned out? Riiiight

What's your point? We're talking recruiting, not player development. And in that department, there's not much of a comparison to be made between Brent and Cuonzo.

MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1512
  • "Seat belts On! We're Going For A Ride!"
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #63 on: March 31, 2014, 04:14:10 PM »
That was definitely an outsider's perspective of him.

Coaches ranked Buzz in the top 15 for X's and O's. 

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #64 on: March 31, 2014, 04:14:23 PM »
Brent Williams: 1 five-star recruit. 9 four-star recruits.

Cuonzo Martin: 2 five-star recruits (one handed to him). 1 four-star recruit.

Not a contest.

As I posted in another thread, Stokes wasn't handed to him.  In fact, once Pearl was ousted, Stokes actually took UT off his list, but Martin was able to re-recruit him and convince him to come to UT.  Martin actually did a helluva job recruiting Stokes IMO.  Also, depending on which service you read Martin has had more than one 4*.  AJ Davis (son of former NBA player, Antonio Davis) was a 4* per some recruiting services if I'm not mistaken.

RyanConroy

  • Guest
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #65 on: March 31, 2014, 04:15:18 PM »
As I posted in another thread, Stokes wasn't handed to him.  In fact, once Pearl was ousted, Stokes actually took UT off his list, but Martin was able to re-recruit him and convince him to come to UT.  Martin actually did a helluva job recruiting Stokes IMO.  Also, depending on which service you read Martin has had more than one 4*.  AJ Davis (son of former NBA player, Antonio Davis) was a 4* per some recruiting services if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks for the clarification. Gives me a bit more hope for this guy.

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #66 on: March 31, 2014, 04:16:54 PM »
What's your point? We're talking recruiting, not player development. And in that department, there's not much of a comparison to be made between Brent and Cuonzo.

I know nothing about Williams's development of players, but one of Martin's 5-stars (Stokes) has dramatically improved over 3 years and turned himself into an NBA player and a 4-star (Richardson) has turned into a shutdown defender and very good scorer.  Martin's other 5-star (Hubbs) had a shoulder injury this season and took a medical redshirt after playing a few games, so hard to know.  Martin's other player development is still up in the air.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #67 on: March 31, 2014, 04:17:16 PM »
Brent Williams: 1 five-star recruit. 9 four-star recruits.

Cuonzo Martin: 2 five-star recruits (one handed to him). 1 four-star recruit.

Not a contest.

You're completely wrong about Stokes. After Pearl was fired, Stokes removed Tennessee from his list. Martin had to recruit him from scratch.

Although, there was a time when Tennessee was close to pulling the coup and getting Stokes committed.
"I wasn't going to commit early, but I knew that's where I wanted to go," Stokes said of his love affair with Bruce Pearl's Vols. "I used to love the way he played, I watched every one of his games. I wanted to be a more physical Tobias Harris."
And then it happened. Chaos broke loose in Knoxville, Pearl got fired and the Vols vanished from Stokes' list. They would re-appear but it took a whim.
"I messed around and answered one of their calls," Stokes said. "At first I wasn't picking up after Bruce Pearl left. Then I talked to [new coach Cuonzo Martin] and he's got NBA experience. I was blown away by what he knew."
Tennessee, once dead in the water, was back in the mix.


http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/basketball/mens/story/_/id/6912761/jarnell-stokes-earned-respect

LAZER

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1795
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #68 on: March 31, 2014, 04:18:17 PM »
I know nothing about Williams's development of players, but one of Martin's 5-stars (Stokes) has dramatically improved over 3 years and turned himself into an NBA player and a 4-star (Richardson) has turned into a shutdown defender and very good scorer.  Martin's other 5-star (Hubbs) had a shoulder injury this season and took a medical redshirt after playing a few games, so hard to know.  Martin's other player development is still up in the air.

If Hubbs gets his medical redshirt and decided to follow Martin to MU, would he be eligble right away?

WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #69 on: March 31, 2014, 04:18:24 PM »
What's your point? We're talking recruiting, not player development. And in that department, there's not much of a comparison to be made between Brent and Cuonzo.

You can be a Brent slurper if u want but a lot of those 4 stars Brent recruited transferred.  You cant recruit TOP talent and not play them! C'mon maaaaan

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #70 on: March 31, 2014, 04:19:10 PM »
You're completely wrong about Stokes. After Pearl was fired, Stokes removed Tennessee from his list. Martin had to recruit him from scratch.

Although, there was a time when Tennessee was close to pulling the coup and getting Stokes committed.
"I wasn't going to commit early, but I knew that's where I wanted to go," Stokes said of his love affair with Bruce Pearl's Vols. "I used to love the way he played, I watched every one of his games. I wanted to be a more physical Tobias Harris."
And then it happened. Chaos broke loose in Knoxville, Pearl got fired and the Vols vanished from Stokes' list. They would re-appear but it took a whim.
"I messed around and answered one of their calls," Stokes said. "At first I wasn't picking up after Bruce Pearl left. Then I talked to [new coach Cuonzo Martin] and he's got NBA experience. I was blown away by what he knew."
Tennessee, once dead in the water, was back in the mix.


http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/basketball/mens/story/_/id/6912761/jarnell-stokes-earned-respect

This is exactly what I've been saying.  The kids really seem to respond to and respect Martin.  I think he will actually recruit well at Marquette and surprise a lot of you guys.

VolFan

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #71 on: March 31, 2014, 04:20:26 PM »
If Hubbs gets his medical redshirt and decided to follow Martin to MU, would he be eligble right away?

I hope not!!! Lol.  We need him next year.  He's from TN for whatever that's worth.

WadeATKBurton

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #72 on: March 31, 2014, 04:21:28 PM »
You're completely wrong about Stokes. After Pearl was fired, Stokes removed Tennessee from his list. Martin had to recruit him from scratch.

Although, there was a time when Tennessee was close to pulling the coup and getting Stokes committed.
"I wasn't going to commit early, but I knew that's where I wanted to go," Stokes said of his love affair with Bruce Pearl's Vols. "I used to love the way he played, I watched every one of his games. I wanted to be a more physical Tobias Harris."
And then it happened. Chaos broke loose in Knoxville, Pearl got fired and the Vols vanished from Stokes' list. They would re-appear but it took a whim.
"I messed around and answered one of their calls," Stokes said. "At first I wasn't picking up after Bruce Pearl left. Then I talked to [new coach Cuonzo Martin] and he's got NBA experience. I was blown away by what he knew."
Tennessee, once dead in the water, was back in the mix.


http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/basketball/mens/story/_/id/6912761/jarnell-stokes-earned-respect

KEY WORD(S ): NBA EXPERIENCE

I told yall, kids respect that. That HELPS bring TOP talent to your program

muarmy81

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1003
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #73 on: March 31, 2014, 04:21:44 PM »
Thanks for the input/feedback VolFan but you seem to be selling him pretty hard...gotta admit, that seems awfully suspicious.  Especially considering that some on the TN boards are hoping CM leaves.


humanlung

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Re: For the Anti-Martin people
« Reply #74 on: March 31, 2014, 04:21:47 PM »
Context is your friend.

At Missouri State, he took over a program that has one tourney appearance since 1992 and played in a conference that typically gets a couple of bids at best.
At Tennessee, he took over a team that had lost 7 of its top 10 players, including five of the top six scorers, from the prior season.
Neither situation was ripe for immediate success.

Would you prefer a coach who got one tourney appearance in his first seven seasons (Howland)?


Um...yeah...because he had three final fours in his last seven...

 

feedback