collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by Zog from Margo
[Today at 04:49:39 PM]


Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[Today at 04:00:30 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Hards Alumni
[Today at 01:00:40 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by 1SE
[Today at 05:22:49 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Bracketology Thread 2018-19  (Read 105272 times)

Silkk the Shaka

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5377
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #475 on: February 21, 2019, 01:16:26 PM »
According to my calculations, we have a 100% chance of winning out.

Ha hard to argue against that, in my heart I know it to be true

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #476 on: February 21, 2019, 01:23:49 PM »
I like how both of those sites still have Villanova bolded and not Marquette.

Ever notice how MU performs just a teency bit better when they're the underdog / behind the eight ball? 


Wojo must be using some kind of sorcery the way he's been able to maintain that illusion despite having the #11 team in the country.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #477 on: February 21, 2019, 01:27:02 PM »
According to my calculations, we have a 100% chance of winning out.

Dammit, 82.... you're supposed to be the math expert around here.



You've been taking too many of the blue pills again, haven't you?  I'm sure you're making Mrs. 82 very happy, but you've got to get some blood flow back above your neck.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

BrewCity83

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3855
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #478 on: February 21, 2019, 01:27:35 PM »
Ever notice how MU performs just a teency bit better when they're the underdog / behind the eight ball? 


Wojo must be using some kind of sorcery the way he's been able to maintain that illusion despite having the #11 team in the country.

#mindgames
The shaka sign, sometimes known as "hang loose", is a gesture of friendly intent often associated with Hawaii and surf culture.

Spaniel with a Short Tail

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #479 on: February 21, 2019, 08:46:40 PM »
According to my calculations, we have a 100% chance of winning out.


GB Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2309
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #480 on: February 21, 2019, 09:41:29 PM »
According to my calculations, we have a 100% chance of winning out.

Actually I think our odds are 50/50 http://www.cc.com/video-clips/hzqmb9/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-large-hadron-collider

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5858
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #481 on: February 22, 2019, 09:52:48 AM »

GoldenEagle323

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #482 on: February 22, 2019, 09:54:33 AM »
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

Butler sneaks in.
If we're a 3 seed i do not want to play louisville again or virginia tech

SaveOD238

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #483 on: February 22, 2019, 11:47:06 AM »
If we're a 3 seed i do not want to play louisville again or virginia tech

Louisville no.  Virginia Tech isn't actually that good, they just beat up on cupcakes which inflated their computer #s

Mr. Nielsen

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5454
  • Facts don't care about your feelings!
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #484 on: February 22, 2019, 02:16:32 PM »
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology


I really wish for the betterment of the sport teams like Belmont & Lipscomb get in over the likes of Oklahoma & Clemson.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22945
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #485 on: February 22, 2019, 02:17:37 PM »
Louisville no.  Virginia Tech isn't actually that good, they just beat up on cupcakes which inflated their computer #s

Part of me would love to see our guys crush Buzz. But part of me REALLY doesn't want to lose to Buzz.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

lawdog77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2551
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #486 on: February 22, 2019, 02:24:04 PM »
I really wish for the betterment of the sport teams like Belmont & Lipscomb get in over the likes of Oklahoma & Clemson.
I will die on the hill of "there is no way Oklahoma  would make it in if the season ended today". They are currently 5 games under .500 in league play.  Moot point probably, they have 3 games against ranked teams. If they lose them all, they are definitely toast.

GooooMarquette

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9489
  • We got this.
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #487 on: February 22, 2019, 02:26:04 PM »
Part of me would love to see our guys crush Buzz. But part of me REALLY doesn't want to lose to Buzz.

That's the thing with dreams...they can turn into nightmares.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26481
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #488 on: February 22, 2019, 06:24:54 PM »
I will die on the hill of "there is no way Oklahoma  would make it in if the season ended today". They are currently 5 games under .500 in league play.  Moot point probably, they have 3 games against ranked teams. If they lose them all, they are definitely toast.

I suspect you'd be lonely on that hill, at least in the "if the season ended today" sense. While they may trend out of the field, they have too much quality on the resume to be left out. 3 Q1 wins, no losses outside Q2, and really bolstered by the fact that they didn't play any Q4 games so they have an excellent SOS. If they go 3-2 the rest of the way, they're almost certainly in, even with a 7-11 conference record.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6045
  • Hall of Fame Hugger
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #489 on: February 22, 2019, 06:42:32 PM »
Part of me would love to see our guys crush Buzz. But part of me REALLY doesn't want to lose to Buzz.

This
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me.” Al McGuire

lawdog77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2551
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #490 on: February 22, 2019, 07:34:30 PM »
I suspect you'd be lonely on that hill, at least in the "if the season ended today" sense. While they may trend out of the field, they have too much quality on the resume to be left out. 3 Q1 wins, no losses outside Q2, and really bolstered by the fact that they didn't play any Q4 games so they have an excellent SOS. If they go 3-2 the rest of the way, they're almost certainly in, even with a 7-11 conference record.
I don't want to be that "eye test" guy, but, to me a team who only wins 1/3 of their conference game doesn't deserve to be in the field.

Mr. Nielsen

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5454
  • Facts don't care about your feelings!
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #491 on: February 22, 2019, 09:26:39 PM »
I did look at OU's non-conference schedule. It was pretty tough.   :-\
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26481
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #492 on: February 22, 2019, 09:53:28 PM »
I don't want to be that "eye test" guy, but, to me a team who only wins 1/3 of their conference game doesn't deserve to be in the field.

The committee has said repeatedly conference play isn't weighted any differently than non-con. Just compare USC & Arizona State's resumes from last year.

Teams will crash out, but with Indiana, Nebraska, NC State, & the Pac-12 in freefall, someone has to get the bid.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6045
  • Hall of Fame Hugger
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #493 on: February 22, 2019, 10:00:20 PM »
The committee has said repeatedly conference play isn't weighted any differently than non-con. Just compare USC & Arizona State's resumes from last year.

Teams will crash out, but with Indiana, Nebraska, NC State, & the Pac-12 in freefall, someone has to get the bid.

Don’t you think the committee will be under pressure to put in a midmajor then an IU or OU?  I feel like that pressure will be there.

"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me.” Al McGuire

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26481
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #494 on: February 22, 2019, 10:09:37 PM »
Don’t you think the committee will be under pressure to put in a midmajor then an IU or OU?  I feel like that pressure will be there.

I think IU's record will be below .500 which will likely take them out of at large consideration.

The big change to the Selection Committee this year is the makeup. In recent years, it's been 5 high major & 5 mid/low major representatives. This year it's only 4 high major & 6 mid/low major reps. In the past, similar makeups led to more at large bids for traditional one bid leagues. I expect schools like Wofford, Lipscomb, Furman, Utah State to benefit, especially in a year when the high majors are collectively crapping all over themselves.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12902
  • 9-9-9
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #495 on: February 22, 2019, 10:18:33 PM »
Don’t you think the committee will be under pressure to put in a midmajor then an IU or OU?  I feel like that pressure will be there.
Here are the NCAA team sheets. They are pretty comprehensive  and worth reviewing. A team like IU has 5 Q1 wins.  They are now in overtime at Iowa and have a chance to pick up another.
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Games%20through%20Feb.%2021,%202019.pdf
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6045
  • Hall of Fame Hugger
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #496 on: February 22, 2019, 10:31:34 PM »
Here are the NCAA team sheets. They are pretty comprehensive  and worth reviewing. A team like IU has 5 Q1 wins.  They are now in overtime at Iowa and have a chance to pick up another.
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Games%20through%20Feb.%2021,%202019.pdf

IU had a golden chance tonight, but goes down in OT.  I just don’t see it
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me.” Al McGuire

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22945
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #497 on: February 22, 2019, 10:34:22 PM »
I wanted Indiana to lose to us and to beat everybody else.

Eff Indiana for not doing what I wanted!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

SaveOD238

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #498 on: February 23, 2019, 09:38:41 PM »
I wasted far too much time on this tonight, but the time-consuming work is out of the way.  I'll update it periodically.

To find the first round site for the top 16, I calculated (Google Maps) the distance from each campus to each host city.  Then I worked my way down from Duke to Virginia Tech (based off the current AP Top 25, which will change Monday) assigning each team to its closest available city.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1roateBVil2mn1EhYLccIh0bl2PGDFuP3LuCmuCjDCsk/edit?usp=sharing

Green is a first-choice location
Red is a blocked location, due to higher seed's preferential location
Yellow is the next closest location after eliminating blocked cities

Currently, this has Marquette in Tulsa.  Amazingly, the last site to fill up was not Salt Lake or San Jose but Hartford.

For Des Moines-ers, the best thing that happened this week that is not reflected on here is Tennessee losing.  Tennessee losing will potentially drop them behind Michigan, sending Michigan to Columbus instead of Des Moines.  Tennessee's #2 (technically #3 after Columbia) is Jacksonville, which opens a spot in Des Moines for Marquette.

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: Bracketology Thread 2018-19
« Reply #499 on: February 23, 2019, 09:59:10 PM »
I wasted far too much time on this tonight, but the time-consuming work is out of the way.  I'll update it periodically.

To find the first round site for the top 16, I calculated (Google Maps) the distance from each campus to each host city.  Then I worked my way down from Duke to Virginia Tech (based off the current AP Top 25, which will change Monday) assigning each team to its closest available city.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1roateBVil2mn1EhYLccIh0bl2PGDFuP3LuCmuCjDCsk/edit?usp=sharing

Green is a first-choice location
Red is a blocked location, due to higher seed's preferential location
Yellow is the next closest location after eliminating blocked cities

Currently, this has Marquette in Tulsa.  Amazingly, the last site to fill up was not Salt Lake or San Jose but Hartford.

For Des Moines-ers, the best thing that happened this week that is not reflected on here is Tennessee losing.  Tennessee losing will potentially drop them behind Michigan, sending Michigan to Columbus instead of Des Moines.  Tennessee's #2 (technically #3 after Columbia) is Jacksonville, which opens a spot in Des Moines for Marquette.

This is absolutely fantastic! Great work, and thank you for putting in the time on this.
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

 

feedback