Oso planning to go pro
You still think we're getting a vaccine in a couple months?
Two questions/issues I have with this comparison....why is the 5th in US pegged to the 23rd in Italy, what is the significance that links those? And the US is 5.5x the population of Italy, if we're on the same trajectory why wouldn't we be some approximate number of 5x the "equivalent" Italian date?
good question. i know at the press conference, they are going to be pushing. time for a lot of pragmatism
Notes from a recent (3/10) UCSF panel:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/notes-from-ucsf-expert-panel-march-10-dr-jordan-shlain-m-d-/
Reading MU82’s recent experience prompts me to wonder, which of us will get it first? My take from this thread is that most of us, if not all, will become infected. No one has immunity. Hope to hear straight forward testimony. Gesundheit.
Obviously this is serious, serious stuff, but I doubt MOST of us will become infected and I really, really doubt that ALL of us will. If we all become infected this country will go through a depression that will make the 30s seem like the good old days.
I'm betting most of us do get infected. But the great majority of those won't ever officially know they were infected
That’s certainly a possibility I’ve considered - and if true I would actually be encouraged (that many would have no or minor symptoms)
Best Twitter accounts to follow for up-to-date insights? Some great links posted in this thread already. (By the way, it’s a shortfall in their algorithm that the most liked, most relevant, most insightful content on such a wide-ranging topic can’t be found via hashtags, search etc.)
Going to be pushing? Like pushing a website google knows nothing about?Regardless, vaccines don't get made in that timeline
I’m not allowed into work Monday since going to Vegas.
Reading MU82’s recent experience prompts me to wonder, which of us will get it first? My take from this thread is that most of us, if not all, will become infected.
some of the potential vaccine(s) are already made, it's the testing part that usually takes more time. what they are probably willing to do is lower some of the standards. but now i'm getting into territory i don't know enough about. forget probably knows more about this part. what i'm guessing is that once the testing reaches a certain point, efficacy/side effects or risk/reward, then they may allow it in certain cases whereas they normally would not. for example, if someone is ill to the point their life is at risk if nothing is done, then allow for administration. i'm just trying to surmise if you will. i know this may sound macabre, but if the virus becomes more morbid and potentially more fatal, what are our better options?
1 month of moderator privileges for the first scooper to fall sick and live to post about it?