Scholarship table
Been saying this for years and not changing now. Still believe that is the right play and hate when coaches let one shot tie a game. I know this is a split decision on this, but the math never made sense to me.Allow one shot to tie a game....OR....require someone to make one shot, miss one shot, get rebound and make a shot.I don’t care who the coach is, I am fouling every time and have never wavered on this.
And #FTSMatter
Was way too much time left to foul in that situation. Kid hit a tough 3. It happens.
Didn't he shoot with like 4 seconds left?Why not foul at 6-8 seconds?
Well, Providence fouled with four seconds to go on Bailey's trey. That almost backfired as he got three free throws (and the ball could have gone in). So there's that.
C'mon, Doc. Two very different types of fouls. Then again, based on them not knowing the situation at the end of OT, maybe I shouldn't trust these dopes not to foul a shooter.
No. It went through the hoop with 4 seconds left. He shot it with approx 6 seconds left. To be safe (to not foul in the act of a 3) we would have had to foul with 8 seconds left. That is too soon. Just about every coach I’ve ever heard of agrees.
Of course MU should have fouled. They had the possession arrow, it was a no brainer to make that decision.Foul up 3, after the first make, commit a blatant lane violation on the second attempt. Keep committing a lane violation every attempt thereafter until the free throw is made or Providence simultaneously commits a lane violation as well (arrow to MU). I have no idea why teams don’t do this every time.
And fouls him while he was shooting? Agree with Ners. No foul.