MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: jesmu84 on December 22, 2019, 08:03:24 AM

Title: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: jesmu84 on December 22, 2019, 08:03:24 AM
Pretty obvious why Mando chapter 7 was released early before RoS, eh?

Quick thoughts: introduction of palpatine felt rush (announce he was alive in the crawl??); The kiss was unnatural carnal knowledgeing awful

Otherwise, I mostly agree with this writing: https://www.barstoolsports.com/newyork/my-review-of-both-star-wars-the-rise-of-skywalker-and-wrap-up-of-the-sequel-trilogy
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: GB Warrior on December 23, 2019, 09:30:26 AM
The kiss was unnecessary in an otherwise solid showing. As a standalone, I greatly enjoyed this movie.

In the trilogy, I felt there were some threads not pursued that left something to be desired (Finn, for one, didn't really get the ending his character deserved). Snoke felt rushed, underdeveloped, then cast away. All in all, it felt like JJ was trying to clean up TLJ - for better or for worse - and ran out of time.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: jesmu84 on December 23, 2019, 10:26:24 AM
Agreed.

I think a trilogy/series can work with different directors, and even different writers. Harry Potter for example.

However, before proceeding with any of the films, there needs to be a team that sits down and discusses the overarching plot/story. They need to have beginnings and endings. Then let the individual movies get there how they want.

Pretty clear after RIse, that Disney/Abrams did not have that plan in place
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: mu03eng on December 23, 2019, 12:04:44 PM
Agreed.

I think a trilogy/series can work with different directors, and even different writers. Harry Potter for example.

However, before proceeding with any of the films, there needs to be a team that sits down and discusses the overarching plot/story. They need to have beginnings and endings. Then let the individual movies get there how they want.

Pretty clear after RIse, that Disney/Abrams did not have that plan in place

Absolutely, there needs to be an architect. It doesnt have to be a map or some sort of ornate plan but someone(emphasis on single person) needs to own the overall vision.

In the OT, GL wandered all over the place and planted seeds who grew (there is another) and planted seeds he ignored(Luke/Leia love interest) but he was the singular visionary that brought it all together. Say what you will about the PT but it was still a singular vision(that's largely hampered by GL having yes people instead of strong creatives that could curb his worst instincts) and it collectively makes sense.

The ST is ultimately memorable but it wont be loved simply because it doesnt hang together.

Side note, if Kathleen Kennedy isn't removed/promoted/retired by some time this spring I would be totally shocked. She has royally f'ed the pouch.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: DegenerateDish on December 23, 2019, 03:23:25 PM
Pretty obvious why Mando chapter 7 was released early before RoS, eh?

Quick thoughts: introduction of palpatine felt rush (announce he was alive in the crawl??); The kiss was unnatural carnal knowledgeing awful

Otherwise, I mostly agree with this writing: https://www.barstoolsports.com/newyork/my-review-of-both-star-wars-the-rise-of-skywalker-and-wrap-up-of-the-sequel-trilogy

I'm dumb, I watched Mando episode 7 the other night, and just got back from this movie. What was the tie in?

I thought the movie was good, pacing was very well done, which made a big difference.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: jesmu84 on December 23, 2019, 03:38:00 PM
I'm dumb, I watched Mando episode 7 the other night, and just got back from this movie. What was the tie in?

I thought the movie was good, pacing was very well done, which made a big difference.

They wanted to make force healing Canon before showing it in the movie multiple times.

 I'm speculating, obviously. But if they introduced force teleportation (objects moving between force users - necklace, saber) and force healing in the same movie, I think it would have been met with incredulity, seeing as how those powers were instrumental to the plot.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: DegenerateDish on December 23, 2019, 03:39:06 PM
They wanted to make force healing Canon before showing it in the movie multiple times.

 I'm speculating, obviously. But if they introduced force teleportation (objects moving between force users - necklace, saber) and force healing in the same movie, I think it would have been met with incredulity, seeing as how those powers were instrumental to the plot.

Ahh, got it, makes sense now, thanks.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: brewcity77 on December 23, 2019, 10:08:10 PM
I didn't hate Rise of Skywalker, it certainly wasn't the bottom of the Star Wars barrel, but other than the opening credits, it never had that magical Star Wars feel that made me feel like I was 6 years old at Mill Road Theatre again.

I really hope from here they go 500 years into the future or past and just leave all the characters we know behind. I want no further association with this timeline. It just feels too disjointed from the original three.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: mu_hilltopper on December 24, 2019, 08:30:08 AM
Saw it yesterday.  Agree that it was not magical, but it was OK.  Lots of forced dialog.

CGI Carrie Fisher was .. unsettling.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: D'Lo Brown on December 24, 2019, 08:45:06 AM
Needed more Jar Jar.

Otherwise, good.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 24, 2019, 10:20:24 AM
CGI Carrie Fisher was .. unsettling.

Other than one scene, I didn’t think there was cgi
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: brewcity77 on December 24, 2019, 10:42:01 AM
I didn't think the Carrie Fisher stuff was bad. They at least did less than they did of Grand Moff Tarkin and were smart to show shots from behind.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: SaveOD238 on December 24, 2019, 01:09:57 PM
I didn't think the Carrie Fisher stuff was bad. They at least did less than they did of Grand Moff Tarkin and were smart to show shots from behind.

I'd argue that the Carrie Fisher stuff might have been the most impressive parts of the film.  They had limited shots and dialogue to work with and they managed to write a script around those shots that didn't feel totally forced.  Going in, we all knew that she had passed and that the footage was re-used, but I don't think someone who doesn't know about Carrie's death would have any idea.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: DegenerateDish on December 24, 2019, 01:11:01 PM
If you were wondering who the Jedi voices were that were speaking to Rey at the end...

https://www.thewrap.com/who-were-jedi-voices-at-the-end-of-star-wars-the-rise-of-skywalker/amp/#aoh=15771273028663&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: Galway Eagle on December 27, 2019, 10:35:47 AM
The stupid healing force is driving me crazy. We're going to say that Ray could do this with very minimal training and certainly not the best training out there. But Obi Wan who was training since birth couldn't do that to save qui-gon?

The kiss annoyed me.

Leia as a Jedi annoyed me (though not as much as flying through space did in TLJ).

Luke grabbing a light saber out of the air when he's a force spirit annoyed me.

More annoyed me, won't be watching it again
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: WI inferiority Complexes on December 27, 2019, 10:40:55 AM
More annoyed me, won't be watching it again
I am nowhere near a Star Wars geek, but I can't stop thinking about the "Chewy is dead... no he isn't" plot line.  4 days later, it still annoys me.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: tower912 on December 27, 2019, 11:18:08 AM
The trailers had shown Chewie flying with Lando.  That had not yet happened in the movie, ergo it had to be a red herring.   
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: brewcity77 on December 27, 2019, 11:52:24 AM
If anyone thought like me that the magic of Star Wars was gone, watch the final episode of Mandalorian. Absolutely magnificent.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: MU82 on December 27, 2019, 12:11:35 PM
Nothing in the movie "annoyed" me.

There were plot holes, silliness, wild leaps of faith, a few things that made no sense, etc. But the same could be said about stuff in even the Star Wars movies that I absolutely loved.

I mean, in A New Hope, why didn't the Death Star just blast the moon out of the way and then pulverize the planet? There! Movie over in about an hour, and no sequels necessary!

For me, TROS was fun, magic-filled fiction. It was escapism. I like Rey. I like a few other characters.

The silly stuff -- like nobody effen dying, or like Leia floating through space in TNJ -- I don't get too bent out of shape about it. It's a movie. And this trilogy was head and shoulders better than the first one. I strongly disliked most of what I saw in those 3, but I nonetheless still didn't come away "annoyed." I just said they weren't very good and moved on. They made me appreciate the original trilogy more.

And finally, the kiss certainly didn't annoy me at all. If I hadn't known it was in the movie, I would have missed it.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: MU82 on December 27, 2019, 12:25:04 PM
And BTW ... I totally agree with this from brewski:

I really hope from here they go 500 years into the future or past and just leave all the characters we know behind.

It would be fresh and exciting.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on December 27, 2019, 12:49:06 PM
Nothing in the movie "annoyed" me.

There were plot holes, silliness, wild leaps of faith, a few things that made no sense, etc. But the same could be said about stuff in even the Star Wars movies that I absolutely loved.

I mean, in A New Hope, why didn't the Death Star just blast the moon out of the way and then pulverize the planet? There! Movie over in about an hour, and no sequels necessary!

For me, TROS was fun, magic-filled fiction. It was escapism. I like Rey. I like a few other characters.

The silly stuff -- like nobody effen dying, or like Leia floating through space in TNJ -- I don't get too bent out of shape about it. It's a movie. And this trilogy was head and shoulders better than the first one. I strongly disliked most of what I saw in those 3, but I nonetheless still didn't come away "annoyed." I just said they weren't very good and moved on. They made me appreciate the original trilogy more.

And finally, the kiss certainly didn't annoy me at all. If I hadn't known it was in the movie, I would have missed it.

Feels about right.  The movie was fun.
JJ was obviously trying to bring everything full circle good, bad or otherwise.
If I didn't see articles saying how the kiss was pulled from some international releases I would have missed.
I will have to see again because I think I missed a lot of time ins and Easter Eggs.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: jesmu84 on December 27, 2019, 02:32:14 PM
I'll clarify my own position:

When I say "the kiss", I'm referring to kylo and Rey.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: MU82 on December 27, 2019, 03:29:55 PM
I'll clarify my own position:

When I say "the kiss", I'm referring to kylo and Rey.

Ah ... got it ... yeah, that didn't seem to fit the narrative much at all.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: Galway Eagle on December 27, 2019, 03:35:53 PM
I'll clarify my own position:

When I say "the kiss", I'm referring to kylo and Rey.

I would like to second this. Just realized that when I said "the kiss" it might've been misconstrued as well
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: jesmu84 on December 27, 2019, 03:38:49 PM
The stupid healing force is driving me crazy. We're going to say that Ray could do this with very minimal training and certainly not the best training out there. But Obi Wan who was training since birth couldn't do that to save qui-gon?

The kiss annoyed me.

Leia as a Jedi annoyed me (though not as much as flying through space did in TLJ).

Luke grabbing a light saber out of the air when he's a force spirit annoyed me.

More annoyed me, won't be watching it again

1. Rey is VERY powerful. As evidenced by the rock movement. And Luke's acknowledgement of said power.

Obi wan also went through structured Jedi training, unlike Rey. And also may not have been nearly as powerful.

3. Leia is a strong Jedi in the expanded universe.
Title: Re: Rise of Skywalker talk - *spoilers*
Post by: mu03eng on December 27, 2019, 05:55:49 PM
And healing power was always in the extended universe just never made it to the movie universe. And the Ben/Rey healing was much more about them being a Diade then that strong in the force