Scholarship table
Also....saw on Twitter that Rayjon Tucker is currently in Milwaukee. Posted a picture of the Bucks practice facility. No word that he is actually visiting Marquette, but thought it was worth sharing.
He is declared for the NBA Draft so I am assuming he was there for a work out at the bucks practice facility but maybe he visited Marquette while he was here.
Do we know of an instance where this EVER happened?
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
For those keeping track at home, that is 17% of all D1 players. The percentage is actually a little higher than that as that assumes ALL 365 used each of their 13 scholarships, which obviously is not the case.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny. Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.
I am not sure how good Memphis would of been, but they had brothers transfer to Kansas.
Oh, and another pet peeve of mine, Bilsu - it's would have, should have, could have. Or you could just use the contraction, should've. Or even Brooklynese - shoulda.Thanks for letting me get this off of my chest.
Two players? Off the top of my head no. But I think Wades point is fair that brothers do make it a special situation. There have been other instances of a single player transferring from a top 10 team despite being a starter.
So if Scooter and Rodney McCray had transferred it would have amounted to losing only one starter from a top 10 team because they were brothers? Somehow I don't think Denny Crum or the Louisville faithful would have looked at it that way.
Are we still recruiting any potential transfers, or are we done? I assume that the big minutes are pretty well distributed at this point and it would be hard to recruit a guy into 5-10ish minutes.
Seth Towns of Harvard is transferring, won Ivy league player of the year last season averaging 16 and 6 boards
Former four-star recruit Dahmir Bishop leaving Xavier.https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/college/xavier/2020/01/02/xavier-basketball-freshman-dahmir-bishop-transfer/2794486001/
When betting the light side - unless you're playing one Pass bet at a time (boring) - you'll always have chips on the table after a win... sure, you can pull back your place and odds bets when you hit your point, but nobody ever does it, which virtually guarantees that every player betting the light side won't walk away until the board 7's-out.Conversely, the primary advantage to the dark side is that on a 7-out, no action remains, which makes it extremely convenient to walk away from the table on a win. The last bet may not seem like it matters after you've been at the table all night, but considering that players have a tendency to wager more at the end of a session, whether they're winning or losing, this really messes up the player models that calculate the "natural odds" of a game (given a certain set of rules). Natural odds are calculated based on the assumption that everything is random, including when the player walks away from the table, but the natural odds are often not the "true odds" at a craps table, because not only is the final bet often more than the average wager, but playing the light side means that said final bet will always be a loss. So the "true odds" of playing the dark side are actually much better than 0.5%... depending on how much and how long you play, it could be more than 5% if you live by the 20x bankroll rule of thumb.The casinos know this... which is why they help perpetuate the negative stigma of the dark side. Getting dirty looks from other players is one thing, but nothing brings out the stick's passive-aggression like someone playing the dark side at a full table.
sure, let's take a guy with a history of knee injuries and hasn't played a full season since 2017-18.