Author Topic: New Uni's again? (Read 8942 times)

MUfan12 · « **on:** July 17, 2009, 12:00:06 AM »

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31954408

Rumor has it Wade is going to Jordan from Converse. Wonder what that will do (if anything) to MU's Converse relationship.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 17, 2009, 06:56:49 AM »

We are still Nike Elite right? I'd guess the Converse star logo would just switch to the Nike swoosh or jumpman logo.

But wasn't there a certain length on the Converse contract?

{Juggernaut} · « **Reply #2 on:** July 17, 2009, 07:20:41 AM »

It just became offical via jumpman
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4335441

Thomas' Danish Delight · « **Reply #3 on:** July 17, 2009, 07:42:24 AM »

Our uniforms are about to be even MORE exclusive

mugrad99 · « **Reply #4 on:** July 17, 2009, 08:00:11 AM »

Love the bottom of the article:

Sponsored LinksHeat Fan :........

Avg. Heat IQ = 83

Are you smarter than a Heat player? Take the IQ test to find out!

www.IQlovetest.com/IQ-test

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #5 on:** July 17, 2009, 08:49:00 AM »

God I hope we don't go to Nike gear. They make every team look exactly the same. Our uniforms right now are perfect.

BrewCity83 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 17, 2009, 08:52:26 AM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 08:49:00 AM

God I hope we don't go to Nike gear. They make every team look exactly the same. Our uniforms right now are perfect.

+1

Just cuz Wade leaves Converse doesn't mean MU will. I thought we had like a 5-year deal with Converse.

bma725 · « **Reply #7 on:** July 17, 2009, 09:51:49 AM »

Quote from: TallTitan34 on July 17, 2009, 06:56:49 AM

We are still Nike Elite right? I'd guess the Converse star logo would just switch to the Nike swoosh or jumpman logo.

But wasn't there a certain length on the Converse contract?

We were Nike Elite before the deal, but that classification ended in 2007. At that point they became the one and only school to be part of "Brand Wade" as Converse was calling it. While owned by Nike, that meant that MU was no longer part of the Nike Elite list of schools.

What it means for MU is still to be seen. There was a new Wade shoe that was supposed to come out in a few weeks, and the players have already had their pictures taken in the old uniforms, so who knows.

GOMU1104 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 17, 2009, 10:39:01 AM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 08:49:00 AM

God I hope we don't go to Nike gear. They make every team look exactly the same. Our uniforms right now are perfect.

While they are Nike...Not all of those schools are "Jordan Brand" schools.

Jordan Brand is somewhat exclusive...we would join the likes of Georgetown and UNC if we began to wear it.

YoungMUFan4 · « **Reply #9 on:** July 17, 2009, 11:12:58 AM »

Easy Solution guys...keep the same gear but switch the converse star logo to the jordan jumpman logo

jaybilaswho? · « **Reply #10 on:** July 17, 2009, 11:21:02 AM »

Quote from: BrewCity on July 17, 2009, 08:52:26 AM

Just cuz Wade leaves Converse doesn't mean MU will. I thought we had like a 5-year deal with Converse.

Wade's deal with converse has what? 3 more years on it? As we have seen with this and with Crean... contracts dont mean sh*t.

They are both owned by NIke so it will be interesting to see if they do switch us.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #11 on:** July 17, 2009, 11:57:17 AM »

Considering a lot of the Converse gear at the spirt shop already has Nike tags on it, I dount think it will effect anything except for the star to become a swoosh or jumpman.

Ari Gold · « **Reply #12 on:** July 17, 2009, 12:56:02 PM »

Quote from: TallTitan34 on July 17, 2009, 11:57:17 AM

Considering a lot of the Converse gear at the spirt shop already has Nike tags on it, I dount think it will effect anything except for the star to become a swoosh or jumpman.

I was gonna say the same thing. I feel like a cruise of the Spirit Shop will yield a lot of Nike swoosh merchandise. I feel like the Shop still sells some Golf Apparel by nike?

{Juggernaut} · « **Reply #13 on:** July 17, 2009, 01:05:11 PM »

except for the fact that Jumpman has much better clothing than converse and nike.

Chili · « **Reply #14 on:** July 17, 2009, 02:11:34 PM »

Quote from: muhannan on July 17, 2009, 01:05:11 PM

except for the fact that Jumpman has much better clothing than converse and nike.

Pretty sure the same 6 year old is make clothing for all three brands.

MUfan12 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 17, 2009, 02:26:34 PM »

From Twitter-

darrenrovell1 With Wade switch to Jordan, Marquette, his alma mater will follow. 3 minutes ago from web

I think it's just MU, UNC, and GTown on that line now. Good company to be in.

EDIT- Forgot about California.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #16 on:** July 17, 2009, 02:30:23 PM »

Quote from: Chili on July 17, 2009, 02:11:34 PM

Pretty sure the same 6 year old is make clothing for all three brands.

That's a good point. For a school so concerned with "doing the right thing" with respect to our supposedly offensive nickname, how do they feel about young kids using their tiny little hands to stitch our uniforms together?

HelixAir6 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 17, 2009, 03:30:06 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 02:30:23 PM

That's a good point. For a school so concerned with "doing the right thing" with respect to our supposedly offensive nickname, how do they feel about young kids using their tiny little hands to stitch our uniforms together?

Ok, I rarely post, but read everday... and I just have one question for you PRN? Have you had a nice BIG cry over the nickname change yet? I mean a BIIIGGG cry... HUGE? Because that might make you feel a little better. I mean honestly, 15 years is a long time to hold something like that in... If you do this, then maybe, just maybe, you'll let a thread go by without bringing it up.

But, if you did have this big cry already... then this has caused you more pain than i think i could ever understand

EDIT: just a simple yes or no will suffice, i dont want to turn this into another stupid nickname debate

dsfire · « **Reply #18 on:** July 17, 2009, 03:36:37 PM »

See, I was going to compliment PRN on his nearly-superhuman ability to tie the Great Nickname Debate in with completely-unrelated stories.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #19 on:** July 17, 2009, 03:41:06 PM »

Quote from: MU HelixAir on July 17, 2009, 03:30:06 PM

Ok, I rarely post, but read everday... and I just have one question for you PRN? Have you had a nice BIG cry over the nickname change yet? I mean a BIIIGGG cry... HUGE? Because that might make you feel a little better. I mean honestly, 15 years is a long time to hold something like that in... If you do this, then maybe, just maybe, you'll let a thread go by without bringing it up.

But, if you did have this big cry already... then this has caused you more pain than i think i could ever understand

EDIT: just a simple yes or no will suffice, i dont want to turn this into another stupid nickname debate

You're absolutely right. I'm the only person who is still outraged by it. I am the reason it comes up at nearly every board of trustee meeting. I am the reason they tried to change it back to Warriors a couple years ago. I am the reason our current name is so universally disliked that they actually thought "Gold" would be better. I am the reason that they are hesitant to get merchandise printed with our current name and logo on it because people are ashamed of it. It's all me.

Warrior nickname: Bad
Associating with a company notorious for use of child labor: Good

HelixAir6 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 17, 2009, 03:46:20 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 03:41:06 PM

You're absolutely right. I'm the only person who is still outraged by it. I am the reason it comes up at nearly every board of trustee meeting. I am the reason they tried to change it back to Warriors a couple years ago. I am the reason our current name is so universally disliked that they actually thought "Gold" would be better. I am the reason that they are hesitant to get merchandise printed with our current name and logo on it because people are ashamed of it. It's all me.

Warrior nickname: Bad
Associating with a company notorious for use of child labor: Good

haha, i wasn't asking at all about the overall situation. I was just wondering where you, specifically, were at in the grieving process. Which i understand is personal, but i thought i would just try to lend some helpful advice to a fellow Marquette fan. Because there is nothing like a good cry to ease the pain...

MU gimp ONE · « **Reply #21 on:** July 17, 2009, 03:52:10 PM »

PRN - find me a major company that isn't using child labor and i'll show you a company that is operating in the red. child labor gets stuff done plain and simple.

i agree with mu Helix... there is not a thread that appears nowadays that doesn't turn into a nickname debate or a TC bash. even if there was a thread about Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Theory, it would turn into how the invisible hand was controlled by TC and the board of trustees. give it up PRN... get off your soap box and enjoy what is MARQUETTE BASKETBALL.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #22 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:06:03 PM »

Quote from: MU gimp ONE on July 17, 2009, 03:52:10 PM

PRN - find me a major company that isn't using child labor and i'll show you a company that is operating in the red. child labor gets stuff done plain and simple.

Do you think it would be OK to change our team logo to a small, shirtless Vietnamese or Pakistani boy holding a needle and thread in one bloodied hand and spinning a leather basketball on the other?

I think it would be great and Dahmer fans would love it.

Tom Crean's Tanning Bed · « **Reply #23 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:10:26 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 04:06:03 PM

Do you think it would be OK to change our team logo to a small, shirtless Vietnamese or Pakistani boy holding a needle and thread in one bloodied hand and spinning a leather basketball on the other?

I think it would be great and Dahmer fans would love it.

Nice strawman arguement.

Anyways, in all seriousness, you may be interested in knowing that Marquette signed on last year to an anti-sweatshop pact.

http://planetgreen.discovery.com/fashion-beauty/sweatshop-free-sweats.html

Recently, Marquette University became the 37th school to adopt the Designated Suppliers Program, under which the institution agrees to contract only with suppliers whose factory workers earn a living wage and have the right to form a union. Other participating institutions include the University of California, University of Wisconsin, Georgetown University, and the University of Washington.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #24 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:11:54 PM »

Quote from: Tom Crean's Tanning Bed on July 17, 2009, 04:10:26 PM

Nice strawman arguement.

Anyways, in all seriousness, you may be interested in knowing that Marquette signed on last year to an anti-sweatshop pact.

http://planetgreen.discovery.com/fashion-beauty/sweatshop-free-sweats.html

Recently, Marquette University became the 37th school to adopt the Designated Suppliers Program, under which the institution agrees to contract only with suppliers whose factory workers earn a living wage and have the right to form a union. Other participating institutions include the University of California, University of Wisconsin, Georgetown University, and the University of Washington.

Fantastic!!

I'm not arguing, you boob.

There are some seriously humorless people on this board.

Tom Crean's Tanning Bed · « **Reply #25 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:14:04 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 04:11:54 PM

Fantastic!!

I'm not arguing, you boob.

There are some seriously humorless people on this board.

You actually need to be funny first to get me to laugh with you.

MU gimp ONE · « **Reply #26 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:16:26 PM »

yeah definitely work on that thing you call humor before insulting someone for not "getting it". PRN, your schtick is old and tired, move on and enjoy your $0.39 coffees at mcdonalds with your AARP card.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #27 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:19:17 PM »

Quote from: MU gimp ONE on July 17, 2009, 04:16:26 PM

yeah definitely work on that thing you call humor before insulting someone for not "getting it". PRN, your schtick is old and tired, move on and enjoy your $0.39 coffees at mcdonalds with your AARP card.

Somebody with an "I Love your Mom" avatar and making old jokes is telling me what's funny.

HelixAir6 · « **Reply #28 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:24:15 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 04:06:03 PM

Do you think it would be OK to change our team logo to a small, shirtless Vietnamese or Pakistani boy holding a needle and thread in one bloodied hand and spinning a leather basketball on the other?

I think it would be great and Dahmer fans would love it.

Wait wait wait... so now you think Marquette has golden eagles making our jerseys??? haha

I'll take the answer to my original question as a "NO"

🏀 · « **Reply #29 on:** July 17, 2009, 04:33:05 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 17, 2009, 04:19:17 PM

Somebody with an "I Love your Mom" avatar and making old jokes is telling me what's funny.

MUgimpONE has proven his humor to be much more worthy than your entire board presence.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #30 on:** July 22, 2009, 12:13:24 PM »

Quote from: MU gimp ONE on July 17, 2009, 04:16:26 PM

yeah definitely work on that thing you call humor before insulting someone for not "getting it". PRN, your schtick is old and tired, move on and enjoy your $0.39 coffees at mcdonalds with your AARP card.

For the record you can also get a soft drink for $0.39 as well. My grandma eats that s*it up.

mosarsour · « **Reply #31 on:** July 22, 2009, 12:28:41 PM »

Just like professional wrestling, all message boards need a good heel (bad guy). PRN is definitely one of the best at getting under people's skins.

You, sir, are the Roddy Piper of MU Scoop!

pillardean · « **Reply #32 on:** July 22, 2009, 12:37:15 PM »

Quote from: TallTitan34 on July 22, 2009, 12:13:24 PM

For the record you can also get a soft drink for $0.39 as well. My grandma eats that s*it up.

Old jokes?

No, a night at the movies with popcorn and a drink does not cost $5.00.

At 75 degrees it is not turtle neck and jeans weather.

Sorry, you don't turn in the bottle for 5 cents after you drink your coke.

Marquette_g · « **Reply #33 on:** July 22, 2009, 08:14:28 PM »

Back to the topic of the thread, I know I'm in the minority but I will not be sad to see the ugly Converse uni's go.

I couldn't care less what logo is on the side, so long as they aren't the Technicolor dream coats we've looked at the last few years.

Frenns Liquor Depot · « **Reply #34 on:** July 22, 2009, 08:41:57 PM »

Like Marquette_g, I am ready for a change. While I liked the old jersey's, the cool thing about MU Bball is keeping the tradition & history of our program going while changing the face constantly.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #35 on:** July 24, 2009, 12:22:19 PM »

My favorite jerseys are the 2004-2006 Nike Elite jerseys, however, the current ones are good too.

I hope they just change the Converse star to the jumpman logo.

wesmat23 · « **Reply #36 on:** July 24, 2009, 02:52:50 PM »

I agree. I don't understand what people don't like about these jerseys. Especially the powder blues that most fans seem to hate. I hope this group uses them alot more than previous teams.

pillardean · « **Reply #37 on:** July 24, 2009, 03:30:09 PM »

Quote from: wesmatthews23 on July 24, 2009, 02:52:50 PM

I agree. I don't understand what people don't like about these jerseys. Especially the powder blues that most fans seem to hate. I hope this group uses them alot more than previous teams.

I thought the Powder blue's were fantastic. Most of my friends thought they were amazing. Perhaps too new school for some (and just because you're not new school doesn't mean your old).

I do like seeing change in the Uniforms, refreshing each year. You could be left with the same uni's from who know's when like that one "storied" team.

Nothing against the old jerseys, but seeing something new could be interesting...unless it sucked.

PuertoRicanNightmare · « **Reply #38 on:** July 24, 2009, 03:45:08 PM »

The powder blues are awesome and I'd be willing to be they sold at twice the rate of either the yellows or the navy blues.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #39 on:** July 24, 2009, 04:35:29 PM »

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on July 24, 2009, 03:45:08 PM

The powder blues are awesome and I'd be willing to be they sold at twice the rate of either the yellows or the navy blues.

Considering they don't sell the yellow jerseys I believe your right!

News:

'23-'24 SOTG Tally

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

Next up: The long cold summer

Author Topic: New Uni's again? (Read 8942 times)