collapse

* Recent Posts

Bill Scholl Retiring by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[May 16, 2024, 06:05:43 PM]


2024 Mock Drafts by Jay Bee
[May 16, 2024, 04:26:22 PM]


Home and Home with Maryland by MU82
[May 16, 2024, 04:15:33 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[May 16, 2024, 01:11:29 PM]


[Paint Touches] NBA Combine results for Ighodaro and Kolek by MUbiz
[May 16, 2024, 10:45:03 AM]


Transfer Portal vs. Recruiting, retaining , developing by MU82
[May 16, 2024, 10:37:13 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case  (Read 75602 times)

Disco Hippie

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #350 on: June 26, 2018, 11:21:05 PM »
Per the SCOTSOW opinion release schedule below, it seems they're waiting for the very last day of the 2017/18 term (Friday 6/29) to release the McAdams vs. Marquette decision.  No suprise there since they generally release the most controversial cases last.  How do scoopers think this will go?

https://www.wicourts.gov/supreme/sc_releasememo.jsp




mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7417
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #351 on: June 27, 2018, 06:52:02 AM »
Well, duh.  5-2 for McAdams.

edit: oops.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2018, 07:46:38 AM by mu_hilltopper »

Lighthouse 84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2982
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #352 on: June 27, 2018, 07:39:10 AM »
Well, duh.  6-3 for McAdams.
6+3=9.  Interesting....
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7417
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #353 on: June 27, 2018, 07:47:26 AM »
6+3=9.  Interesting....

Sometimes I count myself and Rocky as Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices, which is a neat trick since he lives in Colorado.

Ellenson Guerrero

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1857
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #354 on: June 28, 2018, 02:55:38 AM »
I think it’ll be 4-2 for McAdams with Gableman writing the opinion for the Court but Kelly writing a separate concurring opinion.  I’d also expect a harsh dissent from Abrahamson, joined by A.W. Bradley.  Also note that Ziegler is not participating bc she has some type of affiliation with MU.
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

Sir Lawrence

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1725
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #355 on: June 29, 2018, 04:19:59 PM »
Per the SCOTSOW opinion release schedule below, it seems they're waiting for the very last day of the 2017/18 term (Friday 6/29) to release the McAdams vs. Marquette decision.  No surprise there since they generally release the most controversial cases last.  How do scoopers think this will go?

https://www.wicourts.gov/supreme/sc_releasememo.jsp

Nothing today.  I guess a few decisions might dawdle through next week. 
Ludum habemus.

Jay Bee

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9083
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #356 on: July 01, 2018, 12:01:21 PM »
Two opinions scheduled for release on Tuesday 7/3. Not McAdams though.

#FreeMcAdams
Thanks for ruining summer, Canada.

Blue Horseshoe

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #357 on: July 02, 2018, 09:36:57 AM »
Two opinions scheduled for release on Tuesday 7/3. Not McAdams though.

Is the length of time that the court is taking to release an opinion on this case give any clues one way or the other? Serious question if the judges are actually examining their own beliefs and how the cases relates to the context of the law.

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4775
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #358 on: July 02, 2018, 09:49:28 PM »
Is the length of time that the court is taking to release an opinion on this case give any clues one way or the other? Serious question if the judges are actually examining their own beliefs and how the cases relates to the context of the law.

Nah, probably still trying to figure out why they took the case to begin with.

Disco Hippie

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #359 on: July 03, 2018, 09:32:13 AM »
It's official.  Decision will be released on Friday 7/6

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13061
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #360 on: July 03, 2018, 09:41:47 AM »
It's official.  Decision will be released on Friday 7/6

Slow news day, hey?

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #361 on: July 03, 2018, 09:45:54 AM »
Looking forward to people twisting themselves in knots defending a court getting involved with in a contract dispute with a private employer.

theBabyDavid

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • pretty stinkin' cute
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #362 on: July 03, 2018, 10:27:37 AM »
Looking forward to people twisting themselves in knots defending a court getting involved with in a contract dispute with a private employer.

A citizen felt that he was wronged and sought relief in the courts. Regardless of outcome he exercised his rights under the law.

Frankly, this never should have happened. I can't wait for the "Presidential Tweet."
"I don't care what Chick says, my mom's a babe" 

theBabyDavid

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #363 on: July 03, 2018, 10:54:32 AM »
A citizen felt that he was wronged and sought relief in the courts. Regardless of outcome he exercised his rights under the law.

Frankly, this never should have happened. I can't wait for the "Presidential Tweet."


Not surprised that you would be part of the hypocritical class here. You have a history of that kind of stuff.

theBabyDavid

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • pretty stinkin' cute
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #364 on: July 03, 2018, 11:02:15 AM »

Not surprised that you would be part of the hypocritical class here. You have a history of that kind of stuff.

Hypocrite? Hardly.

The man sued for justice. I have no idea how that will end up but he exercised his right as a citizen.

Marquette mishandled that entire matter.


By the way, we  recently filed another patent, this one on sequestration of carbon dioxide. And we didn't steal anyone else's intellectual property to do so.

What did you invent last month? (Besides pontificating incessantly on Scoop!)

There are doers and talkers and you, "Sultan," are the consummate pontificator.
"I don't care what Chick says, my mom's a babe" 

theBabyDavid

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22194
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #365 on: July 03, 2018, 12:23:18 PM »
Matthew 6:3 Keefe.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #366 on: July 03, 2018, 12:30:06 PM »
Hypocrite? Hardly.

The man sued for justice. I have no idea how that will end up but he exercised his right as a citizen.

Marquette mishandled that entire matter.


By the way, we  recently filed another patent, this one on sequestration of carbon dioxide. And we didn't steal anyone else's intellectual property to do so.

What did you invent last month? (Besides pontificating incessantly on Scoop!)

There are doers and talkers and you, "Sultan," are the consummate pontificator.

Says the guy who plagiarized a white supremicist, was called on it, and ran away and hid for six months.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2046
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #367 on: July 03, 2018, 01:05:12 PM »
Prediction?

It's a conservative court so arguments aren't even really necessary. Will a single person be surprised if they don't rule for McAdams?

Courts in this country are about politics - not justice.

Jay Bee

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9083
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #368 on: July 03, 2018, 01:49:36 PM »
Prediction?

It's a conservative court so arguments aren't even really necessary. Will a single person be surprised if they don't rule for McAdams?

Courts in this country are about politics - not justice.

If that’s your belief, stop posting in this thread. No politics zone, Brandi.

#FreeMcAdams
Thanks for ruining summer, Canada.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2046
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #369 on: July 03, 2018, 02:19:31 PM »
If that’s your belief, stop posting in this thread. No politics zone, Brandi.

#FreeMcAdams

 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #370 on: July 03, 2018, 02:31:50 PM »
:'( :'( :'( :'( :'(


More like ❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️

Babybluejeans

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #371 on: July 03, 2018, 03:13:00 PM »
By the way, we  recently filed another patent, this one on sequestration of carbon dioxide. And we didn't steal anyone else's intellectual property to do so.

What did you invent last month? (Besides pontificating incessantly on Scoop!)

There are doers and talkers and you, "Sultan," are the consummate pontificator.

As someone who's lucky to have seen some early success, I've found one thing to be eternally true: anyone who feels the need to constantly bluster about his supposed accomplishments - and try to put others down in doing so - is proof that he has, in reality, accomplished nothing. 

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12919
  • 9-9-9
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #372 on: July 03, 2018, 03:23:47 PM »
Hypocrite? Hardly.

The man sued for justice. I have no idea how that will end up but he exercised his right as a citizen.

Marquette mishandled that entire matter.


By the way, we  recently filed another patent, this one on sequestration of carbon dioxide. And we didn't steal anyone else's intellectual property to do so.

What did you invent last month? (Besides pontificating incessantly on Scoop!)

There are doers and talkers and you, "Sultan," are the consummate pontificator.
I agree with this analysis.
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6084
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #373 on: July 03, 2018, 05:30:27 PM »
Says the guy who plagiarized a white supremicist, was called on it, and ran away and hid for six months.

Source?

WarriorDad

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: WI Supreme Court Takes McAdams' Case
« Reply #374 on: July 04, 2018, 04:46:36 PM »
Prediction?

It's a conservative court so arguments aren't even really necessary. Will a single person be surprised if they don't rule for McAdams?

Courts in this country are about politics - not justice.

My guess is for decisions you don't agree with it is political, for those you do, it is justice.  Same for the other side.  We have courts for a reason, because laws can be interpreted differently and not always the way we want to see it through our own life experiences. 

Will wait to hear the decision before weighing in.
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”
— Plato

 

feedback