Scholarship table
I get that this isn't the NBA but I'll take Buycks over any PG on the Bucks roster. The kid has game.
I agree with this analysis.
I'm watching old, fat Jason Williams tearing it up and thinking that this isn't the best environment to judge a player.
Serious questions....what's the percentage of your posts that say simply, "I agree with this analysis " and is this just to raise your click total?
Buycks averaged 9 ppg in the NBA for the Lakers 2 years ago (yes small sample size) though. He can play in the NBA and he is better than the current options for the Bucks.They should give him a chance.
He played a bunch of garbage games in April for a bottom feeding Lakers team. Bucks can give him a chance no doubt, but he is what he is.
I think he could earn a spot in the NBA and wouldn't be surprised if he was playing in the NBA this year. He had a private tryout a few months ago with an NBA team, Portland I think? He wasn't signed, but he's about as close to being an NBA player as you can be without being in the league.Nobody else on the roster has a real chance. Jamil will have a nice pro career, but not in the NBA
Personally, I think Buycks would be a step up from Delleadova, and think they just wasted $10M a year on a well below average player.
That, lamenting that MU didn't try harder for Kostas, and being glad that the coaching staff is pursuing 'X'.
But but but Dakich said that Gardner could be in NBA if he was in great shape. Except for the fact that he can't jump..it's the Gardner shuffle. Very skilled big man just can't jump and is 2-3" too short.
Buycks reminds me of a guy like Diener - could hang in the NBA for quite a while at the end of the bench - but may be better from a money standpoint off in Europe being a go to guy/starter for a longer period of time. Of course that equation may be changing with the new NBA deal.