Author Topic: 2022-23 NCAA Men's Basketball Thread (Read 239696 times)

MarquetteMike1977 · « **Reply #1050 on:** December 30, 2022, 02:43:16 PM »

Quote from: MU82 on December 30, 2022, 01:57:36 PM

I like our current backcourt and I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t trade anyone for Greg.

But I definitely liked Greg last season. We wouldn’t have made the tourney without him.

Agree Greg is an awesome very friendly person and he helped our NET against UCLA last season

Galway Eagle · « **Reply #1051 on:** December 30, 2022, 02:55:14 PM »

Quote from: Uncle Rico on December 30, 2022, 01:44:15 PM

Do we like Greg or was he a “don’t let the door hit you guy”?

Greg has an MU degree he's not someone quit on the school. Anyone who hates on him or Jamal better not have a grad degree from anywhere but Marquette.

Lennys Tap · « **Reply #1052 on:** December 30, 2022, 04:07:54 PM »

Quote from: Uncle Rico on December 30, 2022, 01:44:15 PM

Do we like Greg or was he a “don’t let the door hit you guy”?

We hate Greg. Anyone who leaves Marquette to play for another school is a quitter and a traitor.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole · « **Reply #1053 on:** December 30, 2022, 04:12:25 PM »

Quote from: Lennys Tap on December 30, 2022, 04:07:54 PM

We hate Greg. Anyone who leaves Marquette to play for another school is a quitter and a traitor.

I was glad that he left. He wasn't very good.

Uncle Rico · « **Reply #1054 on:** December 30, 2022, 04:25:06 PM »

Quote from: Lennys Tap on December 30, 2022, 04:07:54 PM

We hate Greg. Anyone who leaves Marquette to play for another school is a quitter and a traitor.

That’s what I thought

Lennys Tap · « **Reply #1055 on:** December 30, 2022, 04:27:14 PM »

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 30, 2022, 04:12:25 PM

I was glad that he left. He wasn't very good.

Not as good a reason to hate him as his quitting or traitoring but valid as an additional one.

Newsdreams · « **Reply #1056 on:** December 30, 2022, 06:02:06 PM »

Quote from: Uncle Rico on December 30, 2022, 01:44:15 PM

Do we like Greg or was he a “don’t let the door hit you guy”?

Not white...

fjm · « **Reply #1057 on:** December 31, 2022, 03:13:49 PM »

Baylor sucks again. Our NET is screwed.

Newsdreams · « **Reply #1058 on:** December 31, 2022, 04:56:23 PM »

Quote from: fjm on December 31, 2022, 03:13:49 PM

Baylor sucks again. Our NET is screwed.

Very, we're done!

MuggsyB · « **Reply #1059 on:** December 31, 2022, 04:59:01 PM »

Quote from: fjm on December 31, 2022, 03:13:49 PM

Baylor sucks again. Our NET is screwed.

Damn.

PGsHeroes32 · « **Reply #1060 on:** January 02, 2023, 08:13:00 PM »

Purdue finally loses.

At home to Rutgers.

Jay Bee · « **Reply #1061 on:** January 02, 2023, 08:41:37 PM »

Q4 loss for us??

MuggsyB · « **Reply #1062 on:** January 03, 2023, 02:52:18 PM »

The NCAA is looking to expand the tournament to 90 teams.

tower912 · « **Reply #1063 on:** January 03, 2023, 02:52:59 PM »

MuggsyB · « **Reply #1064 on:** January 03, 2023, 02:56:23 PM »

Quote from: tower912 on January 03, 2023, 02:52:59 PM

$$$$

Not a fan of this idea at all Tower.

jfp61 · « **Reply #1065 on:** January 03, 2023, 02:58:44 PM »

Mark Emmert sucks

brewcity77 · « **Reply #1066 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:00:30 PM »

72 would be better than 68 or 64 for that matter, if done right.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole · « **Reply #1067 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:02:13 PM »

It's fine. All you would be doing is increasing the number of buy in games from 4 to 13.

MuggsyB · « **Reply #1068 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:06:37 PM »

It's going to be super fun when those left out will bitch about being 91 on the S-Curve. This is seriously stupid. 72 is fine I guess but I liked 64.

panda · « **Reply #1069 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:07:07 PM »

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on January 03, 2023, 03:02:13 PM

It's fine. All you would be doing is increasing the number of buy in games from 4 to 13.

More business opportunity for your boys at the Mecca too

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole · « **Reply #1070 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:13:38 PM »

I would increase it to 96 teams. 16 play-in games for spots against the top four in each region.

brewcity77 · « **Reply #1071 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:21:00 PM »

32 auto-bids, 24 at-large byes to Thursday/Friday, 16 at-large play-ins on Tuesday/Wednesday. Four sites playing 2 games per day on Thursday/Friday. All in primetime, with a game tipping off every half-hour from 6:00 pm to 9:30 pm EST. It would put high-major brands into those games (always the highest rated) and turn the first weekend into a 6-day basketball extravaganza. The only difficulty is people would have to complete their brackets by Tuesday afternoon, but a small price to pay for a better opening experience.

MU82 · « **Reply #1072 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:28:52 PM »

I'd prefer 500 teams.

Could let in some D2 and D3, maybe a few of those elite hoops-factor high schools.

panda · « **Reply #1073 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:36:21 PM »

Quote from: MU82 on January 03, 2023, 03:28:52 PM

I'd prefer 500 teams.

Could let in some D2 and D3, maybe a few of those elite hoops-factor high schools.

That just wouldn’t be feasible. Could you imagine the printer waste from all of the brackets ?

MuggsyB · « **Reply #1074 on:** January 03, 2023, 03:38:15 PM »

Quote from: MU82 on January 03, 2023, 03:28:52 PM

I'd prefer 500 teams.

Could let in some D2 and D3, maybe a few of those elite hoops-factor high schools.

Why not have a 32 team tournament with rosters of 5'4 and under?

News:

'23-'24 SOTG Tally

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

Next up: The long cold summer

Author Topic: 2022-23 NCAA Men's Basketball Thread (Read 239696 times)