Scholarship table
So it's more whining vs a principled stand?
It’s sheer inconvenience annoyance, got it.
No, they bother me. Masks bother me.But wearing one to stop viral spread isn’t an inconvenience.
But it isn’t helpful, so, why??
Oh good, more of the “masks don’t bother me, so anyone who as an issue with them is a selfish whiner” ivory tower BS. Thanks for the valuable contribution.
Which is exactly what would be expected based on the science. Prior infection is never brought into a mandated vaccine conversation, which is part of the smoke over the past two years, aina?#fearandcontrol
He's not wrong.
I don't understand the fascination with these studies. They never change the take-home message, and are very difficult to impossible to do robustly.
How is vaccination "fear and control?" Really, your points are getting worse and worse with each post.
It's fear and control when Zeke Emanuel goes on MSNBC to say kids under 5 better get vaccinated or else they'll get a serious case of omicron, when studies show the opposite, and he receives no push back.
This limited study specifically recommends avoiding Covid, and the best way to do so is by getting vaccinated.So thanks for confirming what's already been scientifically proven by study after study after study. I believe the scientific term is "Duh!"
I actually had to look this guy up to see who he is. OK...not sure what his statement has to do with "fear and control" by the government. But I guess being outraged about anything Covid related is the what some people want to do.But why *not* get your children vaccinated? Seems like a pretty smart thing to do.
"Scientifically proven by study after study" that there are no long term effects from the Covid vaccine on children under 5? I believe the scientific term is "Huh!"
I was talking about the numerous studies on the general population, which you knew.
Why not get your children under 5 vaccinated? Cause Pfizer’s own data says it doesn’t make a lick of difference, so I guess why should you? They’re currently collecting data to see if a 3 shot regime for this age population will show some level of efficacy but their 2 shot data for this age group helped zippo.
Define "a lick of difference" because last I checked, that wasn't a scientific term.