MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: vogue65 on December 31, 2016, 09:16:24 AM

Title: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on December 31, 2016, 09:16:24 AM
Do we have a dog in this fight?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: brewcity77 on December 31, 2016, 09:28:00 AM
Duke. Based on RPIForecast, Duke has a 0.2% expected impact on our RPI while Virginia Tech's expected impact is half that at 0.1%. Clearly, we cheer for the Dookies.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: We R Final Four on December 31, 2016, 09:43:22 AM
Jesu84 must be on break, because he certainly would have something to say about the placement of this thread.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 12:44:27 PM
Damn Buzz putting a beat down on Duke. Impressive!
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: jesmu84 on December 31, 2016, 12:50:31 PM
Jesu84 must be on break, because he certainly would have something to say about the placement of this thread.

Slacking big time.

Not only is this superbar, but we have like 4 threads on Buzz now. 2 on the front page today.

All I ask for 2017 is a little structure and organization on Scoop.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on December 31, 2016, 12:52:15 PM
Buzz is a heck of a coach.  He's doing unbelievable things at VT.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: AlienWarrior on December 31, 2016, 12:55:04 PM
Hokies may just have a top 10 team in the works- play great defense and can penetrate and shoot
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: #UnleashSean on December 31, 2016, 12:57:02 PM
Slacking big time.

Not only is this superbar, but we have like 4 threads on Buzz now. 2 on the front page today.

All I ask for 2017 is a little structure and organization on Scoop.

God forbid someone disagree with you on placement of threads. Many here enjoy following old Marquette players and coaches. You could just not click on the thread? It was clearly labeled
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 12:57:05 PM
Hokies may just have a top 10 team in the works- play great defense and can penetrate and shoot
He has his jae crowder too
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 01:04:04 PM
Hokies may just have a top 10 team in the works- play great defense and can penetrate and shoot

Love peoples reactions to one game, at home, to a team without their leader.  VPI is good this year, but not top 10.  Is Georgia Tech a top 10 team with a great coach because they are taking it to UNC?

Way to early to be calling teams top 10.  They can shoot though, and that is why they dominated this game, they were on fire.  Next time they may be cold and look like the worst team in basketball.

Same goes for us this year, we could be on fire and beat Nova, then turn around and be cold and lose to DePaul.  If we beat Nova it doesn't make us a top 10 team, it means we were hot at the right time.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 01:06:33 PM
3rd win over a top ten team for Buzz in the last calendar year. Good for him
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 01:13:52 PM
3rd win over a top ten team for Buzz in the last calendar year. Good for him

Who are the other 2?  VPI has the 340th ranked non-conference schedule, I find that hard to believe if they played and beat two top 10 teams.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: jesmu84 on December 31, 2016, 01:16:16 PM
Who are the other 2?  VPI has the 340th ranked non-conference schedule, I find that hard to believe if they played and beat two top 10 teams.

*calender* year. He's including last season.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MattyWarrior on December 31, 2016, 01:16:36 PM
Now we have to listen to espn praise him all year
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 01:31:44 PM
*calender* year. He's including last season.

Got it.  Thanks, was very confused.  Thought work related stress had finally had me living in an alternate reality.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Goose on December 31, 2016, 01:35:20 PM
Kudo's to Buzz. Best way not to have Buzz threads is for MU to knock off some top ten teams and they will have some chances.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: tower912 on December 31, 2016, 01:41:34 PM
The man can coach.   Of course, Duke kind of 'kicked' this one away.    Also, I was watching Duke defensively, in the context of comparing their defense to MU's.   Young and long, but many of the same problems. 
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: rocket surgeon on December 31, 2016, 01:42:33 PM
He has his jae crowder too

i was thinking the same thing-#15-chris clarke  6'6" sophomore stud
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on December 31, 2016, 01:52:05 PM
Can someone direct me to a Marquette message board?

#StopLivingInThePast
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: AlienWarrior on December 31, 2016, 01:58:59 PM
Love peoples reactions to one game, at home, to a team without their leader.  VPI is good this year, but not top 10.  Is Georgia Tech a top 10 team with a great coach because they are taking it to UNC?

Way to early to be calling teams top 10.  They can shoot though, and that is why they dominated this game, they were on fire.  Next time they may be cold and look like the worst team in basketball.


  Their defense is outstanding and they rebound well. That's the main reason they could be a top 10 team. We shall see.

Same goes for us this year, we could be on fire and beat Nova, then turn around and be cold and lose to DePaul.  If we beat Nova it doesn't make us a top 10 team, it means we were hot at the right time.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: AlienWarrior on December 31, 2016, 02:00:07 PM
Their defense is outstanding and they rebound well. That's the main reason they could be a top 10 team. We shall see.


I screwed up the quote thing- mia culpa
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: 79Warrior on December 31, 2016, 02:04:36 PM
Now we have to listen to espn praise him all year

He is earning it. Went to a program that was a mess and has them competing big time. Buzz gave us a few fun seasons.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 02:38:30 PM
Now we have to listen to espn praise him all year


If you put batteries in your remote, this wouldn't be a problem.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: avid1010 on December 31, 2016, 02:49:04 PM
They play tough...typical of many of buzz's mu teams.  Fun to watch.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: mugrack on December 31, 2016, 02:50:33 PM
Buzz flushed the Dukies
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 02:55:00 PM
I'll use this as the de facto ACC thread to say FSUs Bacon is awesome
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 02:56:26 PM
Really all bacon that isn't Canadian is awesome.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 03:03:19 PM
UVA nails a three to go up one with six left - then Bacon nails a three to go up two with two left.  Great game.

Bacon with 29 points. Almost all in the second half
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: mayfairskatingrink on December 31, 2016, 03:06:22 PM
So which rebuilding job was harder, MU for Wojo or VT for Buzz?

Hard to say Buzz hasn't done a better job and isn't a better coach.

Sure hope MU gets at least one win over a good team this year.  Shouldn't be too much to ask.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 03:09:14 PM
So which rebuilding job was harder, MU for Wojo or VT for Buzz?

Hard to say Buzz hasn't done a better job and isn't a better coach.

Sure hope MU gets at least one win over a good team this year.  Shouldn't be too much to ask.


Glad this resurfaced.  It's been a whole three weeks since we last had this debate.  So much has changed since then.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on December 31, 2016, 03:10:13 PM
So which rebuilding job was harder, MU for Wojo or VT for Buzz?

Hard to say Buzz hasn't done a better job and isn't a better coach.

Sure hope MU gets at least one win over a good team this year.  Shouldn't be too much to ask.

Been discussed multiple times. Bert had a year's head start having his own recruiting class following him to his new school and going to a school where the old coach wasn't taking his recruiting class with him. Wojo had been recruiting for K/Duke and took over a program that the former coach took the recruiting class with him.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on December 31, 2016, 03:12:05 PM
Pitt / ND game a good one.

Vasturia just hit a 3 to put ND up 1 with 2.5 seconds to go in OT.

Too bad. PITT had it all but wrapped up.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 03:55:44 PM
Been discussed multiple times. Bert had a year's head start having his own recruiting class following him to his new school and going to a school where the old coach wasn't taking his recruiting class with him. Wojo had been recruiting for K/Duke and took over a program that the former coach took the recruiting class with him.
Soooo you're claiming Wojo had the more difficult task at Marquette than Buzz had at Virginia fracking Tech? That's funny
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 03:58:06 PM
Soooo you're claiming Wojo had the more difficult task at Marquette than Buzz had at Virginia fracking Tech? That's funny


And accurate.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: keefe on December 31, 2016, 04:00:47 PM
Kudo's to Buzz. Best way not to have Buzz threads is for MU to knock off some top ten teams and they will have some chances.

Here, here Goose.

A Marquette victory over a powerhouse opponent would be...refreshing.

The comparison between what is playing out in Blacksburg vs a once proud Marquette program is...startling.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 04:00:59 PM

And accurate.
No chance. I understand we were coming off a down year with a fairly empty cupboard but we were still in a better position than VT
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 04:02:24 PM
The comparison between what is playing out in Blacksburg vs a once proud Marquette program is...startling.


If you find it startling, you are easily started.  I thought it was obviously going to start out this way.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 04:03:00 PM
No chance.


Only if you ignore reality.  The team Wojo inherited was trash.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on December 31, 2016, 04:04:03 PM

Only if you ignore reality.  The team Wojo inherited was trash.
But the program wasn't. Unlike VT's
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Jay Bee on December 31, 2016, 04:05:49 PM
I'll use this as the de facto ACC thread to say FSUs Bacon is awesome

Buzz was on him early for us. *Post from 3 Years Ago*----

Bacon is legit. Reminds me of... JAMIL! (Tonight's version.)

His game screams MU.

Was one of my favorites to watch last spring/summer.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 04:14:26 PM
Buzz was on him early for us. *Post from 3 Years Ago*----

I thought he sounded familiar.  Good call - he has a fun game
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 04:16:41 PM
But the program wasn't. Unlike VT's


Marquette's program is fine now.  VT's was better than you think.

Seriously, it's very obvious to see why VT is in a better position now.

1. Buzz is an experienced coach
2. He fills in holes with Jucos
3. He dragged most of his freshman class to Blacksburg with him.

He may end up going further than Wojo does here.  Oh well.  Not much anyone can do about that now.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 04:18:25 PM
But the program wasn't. Unlike VT's

The program doesn't mean much to kids these days.  It is the coach/recent performance.

See this years UCONN, for how much program matters. 

Both teams were dumpster fires in terms of on board talent/roster balance.

Buzz was able to recruit off his success and bring recruits with him.  Buzz is performing at the expectation that VPI had when they shelled out big bucks to get him.

Wojo had to first establish himself.  Develop success and then use that to maintain success.  Wojo is on track, and is as expected probably a year behind the Buzzster.

The difference between being an established respected head coach, and a first time head coach. 

Wanting to compare them head to head is idiotic.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 04:21:28 PM

Marquette's program is fine now.  VT's was better than you think.

Seriously, it's very obvious to see why VT is in a better position now.

1. Buzz is an experienced coach
2. He fills in holes with Jucos
3. He dragged most of his freshman class to Blacksburg with him.

He may end up going further than Wojo does here.  Oh well.  Not much anyone can do about that now.

He brought Hill and Satchel Pierce...lost Shayok and Chief - who am I missing?

Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 04:29:27 PM
Fine.  He brought half.  He left one. 

Is my language good enough to please your pedantry?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 04:31:39 PM
Fine.  He brought half.  He left one. 

Is my language good enough to please your pedantry?

Calm down buddy - just was trying to remember who it may have been.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 04:43:32 PM
He brought Hill and Satchel Pierce...lost Shayok and Chief - who am I missing?

It's a bit more than that though. 

VPI had a good recruiting class.  Since Greenberg didn't go somewhere new, they were there for the taking (couldn't follow Greenberg). 

That goes with the general differences of a replacing a coach who was fired, vs. replacing a coach that left for a new opportunity. 
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: 79Warrior on December 31, 2016, 04:45:24 PM

And accurate.

Not accurate at all. VT had been a mess and a doormat before Buzz showed up. He has done a great job.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 04:46:46 PM
It's a bit more than that though. 

VPI had a good recruiting class.  Since Greenberg didn't go somewhere new, they were there for the taking (couldn't follow Greenberg). 

That goes with the general differences of a replacing a coach who was fired, vs. replacing a coach that left for a new opportunity. 

At first I was just looking to clarify something I missed but now people are just making stuff up.  Greenberg was fired after the 11/12 season and replaced by James Johnson.  Greenberg couldnt make the tourney in a very public fashion (always on the bubble).

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7847062/virginia-tech-hokies-coach-seth-greenberg-fired-nine-seasons (http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7847062/virginia-tech-hokies-coach-seth-greenberg-fired-nine-seasons)
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on December 31, 2016, 04:48:06 PM

Marquette's program is fine now.  VT's was better than you think.

Seriously, it's very obvious to see why VT is in a better position now.

1. Buzz is an experienced coach
2. He fills in holes with Jucos
3. He dragged most of his freshman class to Blacksburg with him.

He may end up going further than Wojo does here.  Oh well.  Not much anyone can do about that now.

LOL they have no tradition, hadn't made the tourney since 2007, and averaged a 3-15 conference record the 2 years prior to his arrival. They were trash.

Don't disagree with your 3 points below that, but VA Tech as a program was not better than anyone thinks. And no one thinks it was even close to good.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: cheebs09 on December 31, 2016, 06:01:15 PM
It's a bit more than that though. 

VPI had a good recruiting class.  Since Greenberg didn't go somewhere new, they were there for the taking (couldn't follow Greenberg). 

That goes with the general differences of a replacing a coach who was fired, vs. replacing a coach that left for a new opportunity.

Buzz replaced the guy who replaced Greenberg. I believe he only coached a year or two before being fired. So the rest of your point is right on.

Also, VT was routinely a bubble team under Greenberg. Its not like Buzz took over DePaul.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Lennys Tap on December 31, 2016, 06:08:20 PM
Ellenson and Frenn are spot on - forgetful is forgetful and wades (no surprise) and sultan (surprisingly) are playing fast and loose with the facts.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: muwarrior69 on December 31, 2016, 06:08:31 PM

Marquette's program is fine now.  VT's was better than you think.

Seriously, it's very obvious to see why VT is in a better position now.

1. Buzz is an experienced coach
2. He fills in holes with Jucos
3. He dragged most of his freshman class to Blacksburg with him.

He may end up going further than Wojo does here.  Oh well.  Not much anyone can do about that now.

Buzz doesn't have to worry about his players off the court behavior, Wojo does.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on December 31, 2016, 06:11:11 PM
Buzz replaced the guy who replaced Greenberg. I believe he only coached a year or two before being fired. So the rest of your point is right on.

Also, VT was routinely a bubble team under Greenberg. Its not like Buzz took over DePaul.

Here are the preceding 3 years of Ken Pom...the 83 was Greenberg's last year and DePaul may be one of the worst of the high majors (opinion).

DePaul - 151, 174, 183
VT - 83, 169, 174
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on December 31, 2016, 06:15:46 PM
Ellenson and Frenn are spot on - forgetful is forgetful and wades (no surprise) and sultan (surprisingly) are playing fast and loose with the facts.

Please enlighten me.

You think Jhalil and Tyus would've followed Wojo to MU if he tried to recruit them to do so? Interesting take. I tend to disagree, but we simply don't know I guess. Unfortunately for us they didn't.

Also wondering where James Johnson took over immediately after his time at VT to take his recruits along.

Not sure what facts I'm playing fast and loose with. Please do enlighten me all knowing Mr. Lenny.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: cheebs09 on December 31, 2016, 06:18:06 PM
Here are the preceding 3 years of Ken Pom...the 83 was Greenberg's last year and DePaul may be one of the worst of the high majors (opinion).

DePaul - 151, 174, 183
VT - 83, 169, 174

Wow. Didn't realize they were that bad at the end of his tenure. Prior to his last year, they made the NIT 4 straight times and the tournament before that. He may have benefited from a time where RPI far outweighed Ken Pom as a way to determine quality of teams.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Lennys Tap on December 31, 2016, 06:20:56 PM
Here are the preceding 3 years of Ken Pom...the 83 was Greenberg's last year and DePaul may be one of the worst of the high majors (opinion).

DePaul - 151, 174, 183
VT - 83, 169, 174

Yep - Buzz inherited quite a program. One NCAA appearance in 18 years and back to back to back last place finishes in the ACC. But he did bring one recruit with him who could play basketball  (whoopee!) - and if he hadn't missed all of last year with an injury VPI would have been dancing in Buzz's second year. Not too shabby.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on December 31, 2016, 06:27:11 PM
Yep - Buzz inherited quite a program. One NCAA appearance in 18 years and back to back to back last place finishes in the ACC. But he did bring one recruit with him who could play basketball  (whoopee!) - and if he hadn't missed all of last year with an injury VPI would have been dancing in Buzz's second year. Not too shabby.

Still waiting for all these facts to come out that I don't have fully accurate.

I'll hang up and listen. While expecting you to continue to ignore the request for the facts I'm missing.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: JWags85 on December 31, 2016, 06:39:03 PM
Wow. Didn't realize they were that bad at the end of his tenure. Prior to his last year, they made the NIT 4 straight times and the tournament before that. He may have benefited from a time where RPI far outweighed Ken Pom as a way to determine quality of teams.

James Johnson was an AWFUL coach.  VT was 3rd and 4th in the ACC the 2 years before he was fired.  The 83 rank the year he was fired was bad, but before that they were decent bubble squads.  Johnson meanwhile did so horribly that he didnt even grab an assistant gig, he is basketball ops for Miami.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Lennys Tap on December 31, 2016, 07:14:39 PM
Still waiting for all these facts to come out that I don't have fully accurate.

I'll hang up and listen. While expecting you to continue to ignore the request for the facts I'm missing.

You claimed Buzz "took his recruiting class with him" when he went to V Tech. His recruiting class was Sandy Cohen, Marial Shayok, Ahmed Hill and project Satchel Pierce. Of the three top 150 guys, Buzz took one, Wojo took one and Tony Bennett took one. Buzz also got Pierce, who transferred. But whether one of three or two of four, it's inaccurate to say that Buzz took his "Recruiting class" with him. The second and third best guys went elsewhere.

You do this stuff frequently. Rather than having another Chico type back and forth relationship which proves toxic to the entire board, I'm bowing out. Happy New Year.





Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on December 31, 2016, 07:21:16 PM
You claimed Buzz "took his recruiting class with him" when he went to V Tech. His recruiting class was Sandy Cohen, Marial Shayok, Ahmed Hill and project Satchel Pierce. Of the three top 150 guys, Buzz took one, Wojo took one and Tony Bennett took one. Buzz also got Pierce, who transferred. But whether one of three or two of four, it's inaccurate to say that Buzz took his "Recruiting class" with him. The second and third best guys went elsewhere.

You do this stuff frequently. Rather than having another Chico type back and forth relationship which proves toxic to the entire board, I'm bowing out. Happy New Year.

So Satchel doesn't count as going with Bert because he transferred out of VT but Sandy counts for staying with Wojo despite the fact that, well, he transferred out. Remind me who's playing "fast and loose with the facts," again?

Fact of the matter is Bert got his pick of his own MU recruiting class as well as Johnson's VT recruiting class while Wojo got the single leftover that Bert didn't want. Wojo was a full year behind in recruiting, so it should come as no surprise that VT would be further along in getting their program where they are hoping to get than MU is to being where they want to be.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: forgetful on December 31, 2016, 07:22:14 PM
Buzz replaced the guy who replaced Greenberg. I believe he only coached a year or two before being fired. So the rest of your point is right on.

Also, VT was routinely a bubble team under Greenberg. Its not like Buzz took over DePaul.

Oops

Ellenson and Frenn are spot on - forgetful is forgetful and wades (no surprise) and sultan (surprisingly) are playing fast and loose with the facts.

Yes I was forgetful on James Johnson, but who can blame me there, his performance was forgettable. 

I do stand by Johnson having lined up a good recruiting class though (Bibbs and Hudson). 

And I stand by my general point of that we shouldn't be comparing this as there are two many differences regarding the situations; my general opinion is Buzz really had a 1-year head start because of those situations and his experience.

Beyond that, I don't want to get involved as I'm bound to forget something.

Happy New Year.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on December 31, 2016, 08:18:50 PM
Hi, fun fact Bazz has been gone since 2014.

I hate Bazz with the power of 1000 suns but it's over.

He screwed Wojo and Marquette over to infinity but he is long gone.

Whether Wojo is the man to lead Marquette to the promise land or not, Bazz is a wuss of epic proportions because h couldn't handle the slightest bit of pressure.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Loose Cannon on December 31, 2016, 08:28:04 PM


  Are we playing VT tomorrow??
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on December 31, 2016, 11:45:31 PM
Ellenson and Frenn are spot on - forgetful is forgetful and wades (no surprise) and sultan (surprisingly) are playing fast and loose with the facts.

What facts am I playing loose with?

He stepped into a better situation in year one than Wojo did, will employ tactics that will turn them aound quicker and may succeed more than Wojo does cause he's a better coach.

If people are surprised by this, they aren't paying attention.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: bilsu on January 01, 2017, 01:44:44 AM
I do not believe Buzz stepped into a better situation.
First year he was last in 15 team league with a 11-22 record(two conference wins), while Wojo tied for last in a 10 team league with a 13-19 record (4 conference wins). You say Buzz had a better situation and is a better coach, but that does not agree with Buzz's first year results.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Small Orange Soda on January 01, 2017, 02:25:29 AM
What facts am I playing loose with?

He stepped into a better situation in year one than Wojo did, will employ tactics that will turn them aound quicker and may succeed more than Wojo does cause he's a better coach.

If people are surprised by this, they aren't paying attention.

What tactics is he using that Wojo can't/won't?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: The Lens on January 01, 2017, 02:26:32 AM
Buzz is one of the top 15 coaches in America.  It doesn't matter where his program was when he got it, he's a phenomenal coach.  We were lucky to have him. 
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Goose on January 01, 2017, 02:42:01 AM
Not sure on what the debate is about regarding Wojo vs. Buzz. At the moment it is a no brainer on who has performed better and unfortunately it is not Wojo. Time will tell on who ultimately does better but right now there is no hiding from the fact that Buzz has done a nice job at VT.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 01, 2017, 07:12:52 AM
Not sure on what the debate is about regarding Wojo vs. Buzz. At the moment it is a no brainer on who has performed better and unfortunately it is not Wojo. Time will tell on who ultimately does better but right now there is no hiding from the fact that Buzz has done a nice job at VT.

Buzz has done better. He got VT to the NIT last year. Wojo didn't. This year, Wojo was ahead of Buzz until the Duke win. We'll see where both teams finish this year. Wouldn't be surprised if Buzz finished ahead. He has 7 more years of head coaching experience,  he better do better than Wojo.         
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: NickelDimer on January 01, 2017, 08:17:44 AM
Not sure on what the debate is about regarding Wojo vs. Buzz. At the moment it is a no brainer on who has performed better and unfortunately it is not Wojo. Time will tell on who ultimately does better but right now there is no hiding from the fact that Buzz has done a nice job at VT.

The debate was about which program was more difficult to rebuild; MU or VT
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: keefe on January 01, 2017, 08:19:52 AM
What facts am I playing loose with?

He stepped into a better situation in year one than Wojo did, will employ tactics that will turn them aound quicker and may succeed more than Wojo does cause he's a better coach.

If people are surprised by this, they aren't paying attention.

All of what you say is opinion and not fact.

Here is a fact: Bert has VPI ranked while Wojo's team is not. Bert has his team playing at a higher level than Wojo does.

We will see who is in the Dance this year and who is not.

 
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MUBigDance on January 01, 2017, 08:55:49 AM
We will see who is in the Dance this year and who is not.

Or "...who will have the higher seed". I am more bullish on MU's chances of getting in. I got to believe.

As far as Buzz/Wojo...Buzz is a great coach and Wojo is headed in the right direction.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 01, 2017, 09:05:24 AM
I had to watch the ESPN, YouTube, replay video a second time, because it was fun to watch.

Poor coach K. looked like he just ran into a BUZZsaw, V.T. obviously came to play, and the kids stormed the court.  How about we use storming the court in Milwaukee as a metric?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MUBigDance on January 01, 2017, 09:19:45 AM
I had to watch the ESPN, YouTube, replay video a second time, because it was fun to watch.

Poor coach K. looked like he just ran into a BUZZsaw, V.T. obviously came to play, and the kids stormed the court.  How about we use storming the court in Milwaukee as a metric?

Referring to a different thread...this is a case for a smaller more intimate arena. The Bradley Cavern is just not conducive. Give all the students lower bowl seats....ah that would be costly$.....We'd also need to beat a Villanova to generate it.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MU82 on January 01, 2017, 09:27:03 AM
Not a Buzz hater at all.

Buzz is an outstanding coach and I wish he hadn't left.

Buzz did leave a bare cupboard for Wojo, who has recruited well since arriving.

Beating Duke is always wonderful. Still, one home win over a team that was without its best player hardly should result in any conclusion of greatness.

At this stage of their careers, Buzz is a better coach than Wojo. Which should surprise nobody. Buzz is an outstanding, proven, veteran, tested coach who has guided teams to Sweet 16s and beyond; Wojo is a neophyte coach and it's too early to accurately judge him.

I don't know which program was in worse shape 3 years ago - and neither does anybody else. Most of what I have seen so far in this thread are opinions ... including those stated in the preceding five paragraphs of this post.

Opinions are not facts.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: 4everwarriors on January 01, 2017, 09:47:47 AM
Gotta wait 5 years ta judge, hey?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: fjm on January 01, 2017, 10:30:09 AM
Love how three days ago we were so excited about our players and WOJO's recruiting talent and about how his in
Game coaching has improved.
Now here is thread basically talking about him not being good.

If we lose today, will all you flip floppers start the fire Wojo thread again?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 01, 2017, 10:47:42 AM
Love how three days ago we were so excited about our players and WOJO's recruiting talent and about how his in
Game coaching has improved.
Now here is thread basically talking about him not being good.

If we lose today, will all you flip floppers start the fire Wojo thread again?

No that's for the DePaul game.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on January 01, 2017, 10:53:49 AM
Or "...who will have the higher seed". I am more bullish on MU's chances of getting in. I got to believe.

As far as Buzz/Wojo...Buzz is a great coach and Wojo is headed in the right direction.

+1 Now can we move on? (he asked knowing full well what the answer is)
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Mr. Sand-Knit on January 01, 2017, 02:26:25 PM
Pretty hard to judge buzz vs wojo after 3 years when buzz was able to take his recruiting class with him and continue to recruit targets he already had n wojo started completely over
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Loose Cannon on January 01, 2017, 02:54:36 PM


Bed Time.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: bilsu on January 01, 2017, 07:59:35 PM
I still like Buzz and I believe he left, because the administration was no longer happy with him. I think the situation is very similar to the new Cincy President getting rid of Bob Huggins and somewhat similiar to Indiana getting rid of Bobby Knight. While both of those programs have had some very good success since then, neither of them have achieved the success that they had before they ran off the coach that did not fit the public image the Unverisity administration wanted.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on January 01, 2017, 08:17:23 PM
I still like Buzz and I believe he left, because the administration was no longer happy with him. I think the situation is very similar to the new Cincy President getting rid of Bob Huggins and somewhat similiar to Indiana getting rid of Bobby Knight. While both of those programs have had some very good success since then, neither of them have achieved the success that they had before they ran off the coach that did not fit the public image the Unverisity administration wanted.

Good comparisons.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on January 01, 2017, 08:21:26 PM
I still like Buzz and I believe he left, because the administration was no longer happy with him. I think the situation is very similar to the new Cincy President getting rid of Bob Huggins and somewhat similiar to Indiana getting rid of Bobby Knight. While both of those programs have had some very good success since then, neither of them have achieved the success that they had before they ran off the coach that did not fit the public image the Unverisity administration wanted.

The question for me is are the desires of the University right or correct.  If Pilarz is pulling the strings I vote no.

We may have not ended up in a different place in the end, but they fooked this up.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: rocket surgeon on January 01, 2017, 08:22:54 PM
I still like Buzz and I believe he left, because the administration was no longer happy with him. I think the situation is very similar to the new Cincy President getting rid of Bob Huggins and somewhat similiar to Indiana getting rid of Bobby Knight. While both of those programs have had some very good success since then, neither of them have achieved the success that they had before they ran off the coach that did not fit the public image the Unverisity administration wanted.

good points, but i also might add that i don't think cincy appreciated the "huggy happy hour" either
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Billy Hoyle on January 01, 2017, 10:02:36 PM
Hi, fun fact Bazz has been gone since 2014.

I hate Bazz with the power of 1000 suns but it's over.

He screwed Wojo and Marquette over to infinity but he is long gone.

Whether Wojo is the man to lead Marquette to the promise land or not, Bazz is a wuss of epic proportions because h couldn't handle the slightest bit of pressure.

Amen. Glad that phony, scumbag who embarrassed our proud university with his antics and what he tolerated as a coach is gone. Buzz sucks.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 01, 2017, 11:32:54 PM
The question for me is are the desires of the University right or correct.  If Pilarz is pulling the strings I vote no.

We may have not ended up in a different place in the end, but they fooked this up.

Parts were poorly handled on both sides. Pilarz/Larry treated an episodic issue like a systematic one. Buzz could have handled it graciously but he didn't. I'm personally of the belief that when you disagree with your boss, you make your concerns known and then respect the decision that gets handed down and make the best of it. Not sure if that's what happened.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MU82 on January 02, 2017, 12:32:07 AM
I still like Buzz and I believe he left, because the administration was no longer happy with him. I think the situation is very similar to the new Cincy President getting rid of Bob Huggins and somewhat similiar to Indiana getting rid of Bobby Knight. While both of those programs have had some very good success since then, neither of them have achieved the success that they had before they ran off the coach that did not fit the public image the Unverisity administration wanted.

I'm no insider, but to my knowledge Buzz never choked an athlete at practice or pinned a student up against a wall for calling him "Williams."

Look up Knight's last 6 years at Indiana - no BT titles, 4 NCAA first-round losses, 2 NCAA second-round losses. Fact is, he didn't achieve the success that he had before he very deservedly - and belatedly - was run off by Indiana. Recruits were avoiding him like the plague, and for good reason. There are too many outstanding coaches who don't physically abuse their athletes.

I get your point, though.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on January 02, 2017, 09:32:58 AM
Amen. Glad that phony, scumbag who embarrassed our proud university with his antics and what he tolerated as a coach is gone. Buzz sucks.

See I didnt mind that aspect. I dont think is antics were that bad and outside Mayo, his teams were more than fine people. But the way he left and ripped the Big East while doing it was what irked me.

Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 02, 2017, 09:55:53 AM
See I didnt mind that aspect. I dont think is antics were that bad and outside Mayo, his teams were more than fine people. But the way he left and ripped the Big East while doing it was what irked me.

Not easy leaving with dignity after you have been screwed.  The Big East still has a lot of work to do, it is on a tight rope, doing well all things considered.   Without the great tv deal it would be just another mid-major league.  It better shore up its product in all aspects while it has time, the honneymoon is over and the ratings don't lie, Creighton attendance figures notwithstanding.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on January 02, 2017, 10:13:21 AM
Not easy leaving with dignity after you have been screwed.  The Big East still has a lot of work to do, it is on a tight rope, doing well all things considered.   Without the great tv deal it would be just another mid-major league.  It better shore up its product in all aspects while it has time, the honneymoon is over and the ratings don't lie, Creighton attendance figures notwithstanding.

You mean a product that sends half of its teams to the tourney every year with the reigning national champion, 4 teams in the top 25 and current number 1 team in the country? Or am I thinking of some other conference?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 02, 2017, 10:27:56 AM
You mean a product that sends half of its teams to the tourney every year with the reigning national champion, 4 teams in the top 25 and current number 1 team in the country? Or am I thinking of some other conference?

That's exactly the kind of work the conference needs to continue doing.  The battle is a PR battle and for eyeballs and advertising dollars.   

The problem, as I  see it, and BTW, as Al McGuire saw it, continues to be  the problem of a "Catholic" league, but that is another topic.   We only have one token private non-catholic school, not good for the long term.  Look around, no league looks like the Big East.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 02, 2017, 10:59:31 AM
The problem, as I  see it, and BTW, as Al McGuire saw it, continues to be  the problem of a "Catholic" league, but that is another topic.   We only have one token private non-catholic school, not good for the long term.  Look around, no league looks like the Big East.
What does that matter?  I mean, are you arguing that the BE is somehow tarnished due to the religious affiliations of its schools?  It doesn't seem to me like it is even a topic that ever comes up.

The BE was formed primarily because all the schools were/are basketball centric, i.e., football would no longer wag the dog, not due to religious affiliation.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: wadesworld on January 04, 2017, 11:59:59 AM
See I didnt mind that aspect. I dont think is antics were that bad and outside Mayo, his teams were more than fine people. But the way he left and ripped the Big East while doing it was what irked me.

That's debatable.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Galway Eagle on January 04, 2017, 12:04:12 PM
See I didnt mind that aspect. I dont think is antics were that bad and outside Mayo, his teams were more than fine people. But the way he left and ripped the Big East while doing it was what irked me.

Yeah you weren't here for 2010-2011, you'd feel very differently about the character of some of his players (though certain posters still can't accept that the incidents happened)
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 04, 2017, 12:30:17 PM
What does that matter?  I mean, are you arguing that the BE is somehow tarnished due to the religious affiliations of its schools?  It doesn't seem to me like it is even a topic that ever comes up.

The BE was formed primarily because all the schools were/are basketball centric, i.e., football would no longer wag the dog, not due to religious affiliation.


Yes, that is exactly what I  mean.  I  understand the basketball centric rationalization.

The subject never comes up because it is a difficult subject.  It came up very often in the late 60's and 70's when Al was runnining the show and Marquette was an independent.  Then the leagues took over, everone had to join a league and now we are in exactly the kind of league that Al wanted to avoid. 

We are lucky to be in the Big East, and the Big East is lucky to have us.

Now let me go to an extreme to make a point, imagine a Big 20, East and West Divisions.

San Francisco,  Gonzaga, Creighton, St. Marys, Marquette, Butler, De Paul, St. Louis, Xavier, Dayton. in the West.

Providence, St. Johns, Seton Hall, Vilanova, Georgetown, St. Bonaventure, St. Josephs, Niagra, Detroit, and Duquesne in the East.     

How does that sound?    To many people the Big East sounds, as currently constituted, similar.

Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on January 04, 2017, 12:35:40 PM

Yes, that is exactly what I  mean.  I  understand the basketball centric rationalization.

The subject never comes up because it is a difficult subject.  It came up very often in the late 60's and 70's when Al was runnining the show and Marquette was an independent.  Then the leagues took over, everone had to join a league and now we are in exactly the kind of league that Al wanted to avoid. 

We are lucky to be in the Big East, and the Big East is lucky to have us.

Now let me go to an extreme to make a point, imagine a Big 20, East and West Divisions.

San Francisco,  Gonzaga, Creighton, St. Marys, Marquette, Butler, De Paul, St. Louis, Xavier, Dayton. in the West.

Providence, St. Johns, Seton Hall, Vilanova, Georgetown, St. Bonaventure, St. Josephs, Niagra, Detroit, and Duquesne in the East.     

How does that sound?    To many people the Big East sounds, as currently constituted, similar.



Those people are morons.

Look, I love Al and what he did for Marquette.  But using his thoughts from 40+ years ago on our current conference affiliation makes no sense.  He had those thoughts when a school could still be an independent.  When television contracts weren't all that lucrative and tied to conferences. 

Simply put, the landscape has changed too much.  The fact that nine of the ten schools are Catholic is in no way a concern. 
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: BM1090 on January 04, 2017, 12:40:39 PM
All of what you say is opinion and not fact.

Here is a fact: Bert has VPI ranked while Wojo's team is not. Bert has his team playing at a higher level than Wojo does.

We will see who is in the Dance this year and who is not.

 

Virginia Tech is 32 Kenpom, we're 36. His team is playing at a higher level, but barely.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on January 04, 2017, 01:05:01 PM
Anyone that thinks the current incarnation of the Big East is a mid-major is either uninformed or pushing an alternative agenda.

Our conference is now widely (again) considered a power basketball conference. Our performance has proven that, our attendance has shown that and our schools' commitment to elite basketball has solidified that.

Buzz, for all of his analytics and insight, actually guessed wrong on the new Big East - as did ESPN, media personalities, as well as other collegiate insiders. It has not only gotten the results, but it has also proven that you don't need P5 football in order to have successful D1 athletics program. Football, in reality, does not drive the proverbial bus.

We were supposed to be left for dead, with no hope of surviving in this new world. Not only did we survive, but we have now become one of the predators - able to take any non-football program we want because we offer more money, exposure and opportunity than any other non-football conference in the country. It's quite the reversal of what the old Big East had become.

Our conference affiliation is a strength of Marquette Athletics for sure.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on January 04, 2017, 01:06:12 PM

Yes, that is exactly what I  mean.  I  understand the basketball centric rationalization.

The subject never comes up because it is a difficult subject.  It came up very often in the late 60's and 70's when Al was runnining the show and Marquette was an independent.  Then the leagues took over, everone had to join a league and now we are in exactly the kind of league that Al wanted to avoid. 

We are lucky to be in the Big East, and the Big East is lucky to have us.

Now let me go to an extreme to make a point, imagine a Big 20, East and West Divisions.

San Francisco,  Gonzaga, Creighton, St. Marys, Marquette, Butler, De Paul, St. Louis, Xavier, Dayton. in the West.

Providence, St. Johns, Seton Hall, Vilanova, Georgetown, St. Bonaventure, St. Josephs, Niagra, Detroit, and Duquesne in the East.     

How does that sound?    To many people the Big East sounds, as currently constituted, similar.

ABD
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 04, 2017, 01:35:02 PM

Yes, that is exactly what I  mean.
So exactly how do you think it tarnishes Marquette and/or the Big East?  It what way are we negatively impacted?  TV contract?  Recruits?  Coaches? Other?

I'm pretty anti-organized religion, but I can't see even a whiff of a negative impact.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: brewcity77 on January 04, 2017, 02:30:22 PM
Those people are morons.

Look, I love Al and what he did for Marquette.  But using his thoughts from 40+ years ago on our current conference affiliation makes no sense.  He had those thoughts when a school could still be an independent.  When television contracts weren't all that lucrative and tied to conferences. 

Simply put, the landscape has changed too much.  The fact that nine of the ten schools are Catholic is in no way a concern.

This x1,000.

Villanova, Xavier, Butler, and Creighton are playing at an elite level. Georgetown and Marquette are elite names. The rest have done enough over the years to justify being here (okay...maybe not DePaul, but someone's gotta lose). This conference is at absolute worst one of the top-three conferences in the country. At worst. And anyone trying to judge this conference on some silly, 40-year-old criteria needs to realize it's not the 1970s anymore.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Galway Eagle on January 04, 2017, 02:36:27 PM
This x1,000.

Villanova, Xavier, Butler, and Creighton are playing at an elite level. Georgetown and Marquette are elite names. The rest have done enough over the years to justify being here (okay...maybe not DePaul, but someone's gotta lose). This conference is at absolute worst one of the top-three conferences in the country. At worst. And anyone trying to judge this conference on some silly, 40-year-old criteria needs to realize it's not the 1970s anymore.

This is pretty important because 90% of the rest of the conference's success came after Al was around.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 04, 2017, 04:03:49 PM
This is pretty important because 90% of the rest of the conference's success came after Al was around.
I don't think he is arguing that those teams shouldn't be included because they weren't historically successful in the 70's, I think he is strictly arguing that it shouldn't be a conference with schools all with similar/same religious affiliation.  I honestly don't know why Al felt that way (or if he even did), maybe for the same reason some people thought Kennedy couldn't be elected because people wouldn't vote for a Catholic as President?

In any event, that time has passed and I don't see anyone even refer to it as a league with a religious affiliation much less have that affiliation impact MU basketball negatively.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 04, 2017, 05:48:18 PM
First of all, regarding being an independent, it was an advantage for Marquette then as the regional/syndicated sports networks like Eddie Einhorn's TVS would put MU on prime weekend slots.  Conference teams would usually only be carried locally, if at all.  MU would get national exposure, full revenue, and all their NCAA money. 

The advent of cable TV changed the game and the BE was borne with ESPN and WGN Superstation locked up DePaul. MU passed on the BE at the same time the Piano Man sunk us.  Through a series of conference moves, Cords saved us.

As to Buzz bashing the BE, in order to had to claim that his contract had materially changed in order to enact the escape clause.  The AD and league changes gave him cover after Wild and Cords told Buzz to hold off for his agenda until the new admin was hired).

The ironic thing is that it was Larry leaving that he used to pop that cork (the Larry, who spent most of his time looking for a way to bounce Buzz or renegotiate those clad iron outs).

Lesson learned on all of this:  Keep the academic administration and BOT out of the basketball business decisions.  They will fook it up nine times out of ten.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on January 04, 2017, 06:30:35 PM
By "academic administration" do you mean the president of the university?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 04, 2017, 07:25:33 PM
By "academic administration" do you mean the president of the university?

Not limited to, in both cases.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on January 04, 2017, 07:33:39 PM
The president should absolutely be involved in "basketball business decisions." It is ultimately his responsibility.  They just have to be competent at it.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 04, 2017, 07:55:17 PM
The president should absolutely be involved in "basketball business decisions." It is ultimately his responsibility.  They just have to be competent at it.

Which is why you have an Athletics Director/VP.  "Involved" and "Approving" are two different things.  Buck Raynor was a great university president with oversight by the Marquette Athletics Board...and they took basketball for granted, but at least corrected himself with hiring Cords and empowered him.

Pilarz and crew...well...

Fr. Wild got it right. Both times.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 02:38:35 AM
First of all, regarding being an independent, it was an advantage for Marquette then as the regional/syndicated sports networks like Eddie Einhorn's TVS would put MU on prime weekend slots.  Conference teams would usually only be carried locally, if at all.  MU would get national exposure, full revenue, and all their NCAA money. 

The advent of cable TV changed the game and the BE was borne with ESPN and WGN Superstation locked up DePaul. MU passed on the BE at the same time the Piano Man sunk us.  Through a series of conference moves, Cords saved us.

As to Buzz bashing the BE, in order to had to claim that his contract had materially changed in order to enact the escape clause.  The AD and league changes gave him cover after Wild and Cords told Buzz to hold off for his agenda until the new admin was hired).

The ironic thing is that it was Larry leaving that he used to pop that cork (the Larry, who spent most of his time looking for a way to bounce Buzz or renegotiate those clad iron outs).

Lesson learned on all of this:  Keep the academic administration and BOT out of the basketball business decisions.  They will fook it up nine times out of ten.

Lesson learned is that when you have a lawyer in charge you get a legal decision, an engineer, an engineering decision, an accountant sn accounting decision, etc., etc.

Who are the BOT's, do-gooders, philanthropists, socialites, academics, fundraisers,  successful people in their field, networkers, politoicos, lucky dogs, and a few tokens.  Not exactly a tiger team to make good athletic decisions.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Newsdreams on January 05, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
Lesson learned is that when you have a lawyer in charge you get a legal decision, an engineer, an engineering decision, an accountant sn accounting decision, etc., etc.

Who are the BOT's, do-gooders, philanthropists, socialites, academics, fundraisers,  successful people in their field, networkers, politoicos, lucky dogs, and a few tokens.  Not exactly a tiger team to make good athletic decisions.
So Doc' Rivers don't know, hey?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: 🏀 on January 05, 2017, 11:08:00 AM

Yes, that is exactly what I  mean.  I  understand the basketball centric rationalization.

The subject never comes up because it is a difficult subject.  It came up very often in the late 60's and 70's when Al was runnining the show and Marquette was an independent.  Then the leagues took over, everone had to join a league and now we are in exactly the kind of league that Al wanted to avoid. 

We are lucky to be in the Big East, and the Big East is lucky to have us.

Now let me go to an extreme to make a point, imagine a Big 20, East and West Divisions.

San Francisco,  Gonzaga, Creighton, St. Marys, Marquette, Butler, De Paul, St. Louis, Xavier, Dayton. in the West.

Providence, St. Johns, Seton Hall, Vilanova, Georgetown, St. Bonaventure, St. Josephs, Niagra, Detroit, and Duquesne in the East.     

How does that sound?    To many people the Big East sounds, as currently constituted, similar.



Sounds terrible, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 05, 2017, 01:04:01 PM
Lesson learned on all of this:  Keep the academic administration and BOT and boosters out of the basketball business decisions.  They will fook it up nine times out of ten.

FIFY

Of course the basketball's purpose is to ultimately serve the academic administration so they need to have at least oversight.

I'm curious, what basketball business decision did you think that the academic administration and BOT fooked up? I disagreed with a lot of that decisions that resulted in the Williams v. Williams fued, but those came with the support of the athletic director.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 06, 2017, 08:23:40 AM
FIFY

Of course the basketball's purpose is to ultimately serve the academic administration so they need to have at least oversight.

I'm curious, what basketball business decision did you think that the academic administration and BOT fooked up? I disagreed with a lot of that decisions that resulted in the Williams v. Williams fued, but those came with the support of the athletic director.

Not joining the Big East originally, realizing the cable TV was going to change everything. Passing on Denny Crum, Digger Phelps. Going cheap.  Thinking the Old Gym was state of the Art. Making Al's life hell.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: GGGG on January 06, 2017, 08:26:04 AM
Was Marquette even asked to join the original Big East?
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 06, 2017, 09:56:37 AM
Not joining the Big East originally, realizing the cable TV was going to change everything. Passing on Denny Crum, Digger Phelps. Going cheap.  Thinking the Old Gym was state of the Art. Making Al's life hell.

Gotcha. I wasn't alive for any of those so I have no insight.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:26:05 AM
Sounds terrible, in my opinion.
That's my point .
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:29:34 AM
Gotcha. I wasn't alive for any of those so I have no insight.
Another very good point, they drove Al out as well.  They want their cake and want to eat it at the same time.   They want to be NYU or Princeton and Kentucky or Syracuse.  Can't happen.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:30:52 AM
Gotcha. I wasn't alive for any of those so I have no insight.

Now there is an honest statement without anger and with some maturity.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:31:45 AM
Was Marquette even asked to join the original Big East?

Are you kidding, it was before the jet age.
Title: Re: Duke vs. V.T. tonight
Post by: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:36:11 AM
So Doc' Rivers don't know, hey?

One out of how many? 

I think it's time for me to put my ignore button to work again and save myself some valuable time.

And I  have to rest up as the Villanova game is on at 2 in the morning here.  In the old days I  would drive to a mountain top to try and get a signal from Milwaukee on a powerful radio, yes, I'm  a little nuts.