Oso planning to go pro
It shouldn’t be my choice. Honestly, your tactics are a great example of why I haven’t posted a lot of information on here I otherwise would have.
It's awesome that you didn't even read the account of what happened McAdams is relying upon (which I'm sure it totally unbiased) and yet you come here pontificating about how awful Marquette acted."Seems like you think that Snapchats are sent out to the masses at random (they are not)./"From McAdams's blog:Alex and friends were playing a “game” in which they would randomly scroll through their phones while the “Apple Airdrop” function was on, which allows photos to be sent to all nearby devices without specifying a recipientSo they sent this photo out to everyone near by without specifying who. that is the very definition of sending it out at random. In fact, McAdams goes on to write:"Sending photos to random people who happen to be connected to the same Wi-Fi hotspot is pretty dumb.""If he is beyond 18 I would not characterize him as a "boy""From McAdams' blog:The photo was shot almost two years ago, with Enrique and some of his high school buddies and members of his soccer team. The black doll was owned by one of Enrique’s buddies; he carried it around a lot. The doll was supposedly owned and carried around more than two years ago by a kid in high school. Not an 18-year-old college student. A boy.I mean, one would think you would at least read what happened before you came here condemning anyone.
When put in simple terms, your logic is incredibly flawed. Racism = posing with a doll that is a different skin color? Lumping that person (or 4 people in this case) together with real racists is simply offensive. Do you not see the disconnect?
Seriously, stop being such a whiner. I'm not posting political points of view. I'm not debating any sort of political position.
First of all, I didn't call him a racist. I said he was "being racist," ie, his actions were racist. Which IMO they clearly were.Second, he wasn't simply "posing with a doll that is different skin color." They were pointing a toy gun at the doll. Being intellectually dishonest by excluding key details of the photo isn't a good look.
You’re taking a Supreme Court opinion and claiming it’s political, then rejoicing in the fact you’re claiming it’s political. FOH
Yes. I am claiming that the Supreme Court decision was based on politics. That is not a political statement.
1. Your point is clear, Penny + Lil Penny = ok because they are the same skin color. Fred Rogers + Lil Penny = not ok because they are different.2. The gun is not real. The doll is not a person. The image is a joke. Intellectual dishonesty, plain and simple.3. Please define racism and explain why, in your opinion, the image is an act of racism.
Might have to “knock” some sense into you. Take pride in making Scoop less valuable, bud.