Oso planning to go pro
Unfortunately neither of you have been successful. All I have to do is remind you both of your slurp love and excuse making for Wojo, even when he was desperately flailingBut its OK now as you can cover that up by cheering on Shaka. Arrogance can always be forgiven, but often does one who has it ever loses it.
How quickly we can forget.Back in Dec 2018, Markus Howard put in 24 in a row against Buffalo. On 12 possessions.75-65 when it began and 99-79 when he was finished. A little over 5 minutes of game clock time.GAME PLAY-BY-PLAY------------------------7:11 79 3 pt + FT6:38 82 3 pt6:01 85 3 pt5:26 - Howard Turnover4:59 87 2 pt in paint4:33 89 2 FT3:56 92 3 pt3:29 - Howard miss 3 pt3:07 94 2 FT2:25 - Howard miss jumper2:16 96 2 FT1:44 99 3 pt1:22 SUB OUT - Howard1:13 101 jumper by ChartounyIn all, Howard scored 40 points in the second half. https://gomarquette.com/sports/mens-basketball/stats/2018-19/buffalo/boxscore/5972
Markus was so good in December & January.
For God sake, it’s nearly April and Kam Jones is doing MOP stuff. Why are we talking Wojo things? Be better people!!!
The question was asked about consecutive points in a game. The answer was Markus. Be better. Get over the Markus derangement syndrome.
Hey buddy we’re not here to celebrate January. THISIS MARCH.
FFS someone asked a question and the answer was given. That's all.
Exactly. So celebrate former achievements and get ready for the next.
Let’s keep the main thing the main thing, alright bro?
“Achievements” lol
Kam's run yesterday was beautiful and timely.
Scoring 24 points in a row while leading your team to victory against a #15 team in the county is an achievement. Sorry you don't understand that.
Sure but I’ll still take a 18 point run in an NCAA tourney win than a random regular season game.To that point, I have zero recollection of that game or who Marquette even played.
You have zero recollection of that Buffalo game when Markus went bananas? Are you oksy?
It was a ridiculous game from Markus, but that’s on the past.
It was an answer to a question