collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by mugrad_89
[Today at 07:11:41 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by tower912
[Today at 06:25:35 PM]


Shaka interview by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 04:53:31 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by tower912
[Today at 02:25:05 PM]


Does Bucky NOT have a Basketball NIL? by MU82
[Today at 02:17:00 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Shooter McGavin
[Today at 11:32:50 AM]


Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by dgies9156
[Today at 09:15:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: The Field of 68 on Marquette  (Read 3066 times)

nycwarrior

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
The Field of 68 on Marquette
« on: January 14, 2023, 06:56:26 AM »
Lots of love for what Shaka has built from Rob Dauster and company.

Starts with a segue about the game MU gave Perdue at 35:30-ish and continues  into a related Big East Top 4 convo at 40:30.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-field-of-68-after-dark-podcast/id1540628867?i=1000594407893

Lots of love for the culture and foundation of belief that’s been built…but still more belief in Providence, UConn or X to take the league.

For easy tweeting - https://twitter.com/thefieldof68/status/1614119733355491328?s=46&t=K9jZ1QoywC7G8vTKbjaPXA
« Last Edit: January 14, 2023, 08:02:14 AM by nycwarrior »

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26472
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2023, 06:58:01 AM »
We were picked 9th and still no one thinks we can overcome that to finish at the top of the league. Let's just beat Xavier and Providence in our next two and see where the national thought process is then.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

mileskishnish72

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4551
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2023, 06:59:28 AM »
1, Brew.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17554
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2023, 08:18:58 AM »
The media hates MU.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22936
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2023, 09:29:49 AM »
The media hates MU.

True ... but the refs hate us even more and always have!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26472
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2023, 07:07:41 PM »
I'm glad to see Marquette get attention, but this whole "they're fun plucky underdogs, Shaka has them believing and playing better than they are" is complete BS from people who can't believe this team is actually better than the 9th place they projected us in the preseason.

Our team fights hard and plays great as a unit, but if you don't see the absolutely elite skills on this team you don't know the game.

Kam Jones is top-5 nationally in scoring at the rim and he's the only player under 6'8" in the top-5. Shot Quality ranks him top-5 in shot selection. He is absurd when it comes to points scored vs expected, by far best in the league.

Tyler and Oso, as Nevada said on Thursday, are the best passes at their positions in the country. These aren't guys that luck into assists. TK is 6th nationally in assist rate and Oso is a unicorn that allows us to play with two point guards through the center.

Stevie and O-Max are elite on ball defenders who cover up our other defensive deficiencies and happen to be highly efficient on offense as well.

Dauster wrote the Big East preview for Field of 68 and picked us 9th, like many others. No one likes to admit they were wrong, but the national media was wrong and it's about time they accept that reality and acknowledge this team is good and its players have elite level talents.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12290
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2023, 08:15:44 PM »
I'm glad to see Marquette get attention, but this whole "they're fun plucky underdogs, Shaka has them believing and playing better than they are" is complete BS from people who can't believe this team is actually better than the 9th place they projected us in the preseason.

Our team fights hard and plays great as a unit, but if you don't see the absolutely elite skills on this team you don't know the game.

Kam Jones is top-5 nationally in scoring at the rim and he's the only player under 6'8" in the top-5. Shot Quality ranks him top-5 in shot selection. He is absurd when it comes to points scored vs expected, by far best in the league.

Tyler and Oso, as Nevada said on Thursday, are the best passes at their positions in the country. These aren't guys that luck into assists. TK is 6th nationally in assist rate and Oso is a unicorn that allows us to play with two point guards through the center.

Stevie and O-Max are elite on ball defenders who cover up our other defensive deficiencies and happen to be highly efficient on offense as well.

Dauster wrote the Big East preview for Field of 68 and picked us 9th, like many others. No one likes to admit they were wrong, but the national media was wrong and it's about time they accept that reality and acknowledge this team is good and its players have elite level talents.

Not just the National media. Some scoopers though we were lacking in the talent department.

GoldenEagles03

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3783
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2023, 08:17:43 PM »
Not just the National media. Some scoopers though we were lacking in the talent department.

I believe you can win without talent, and this staff would be capable of doing so, but this team absolutely has loads of it.  The question was how quickly could they develop and that seems to have been answered through 18 games.
VIOLENCE!

Ellenson Guerrero

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1857
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2023, 09:39:13 PM »
I'm glad to see Marquette get attention, but this whole "they're fun plucky underdogs, Shaka has them believing and playing better than they are" is complete BS from people who can't believe this team is actually better than the 9th place they projected us in the preseason.

Our team fights hard and plays great as a unit, but if you don't see the absolutely elite skills on this team you don't know the game.

Kam Jones is top-5 nationally in scoring at the rim and he's the only player under 6'8" in the top-5. Shot Quality ranks him top-5 in shot selection. He is absurd when it comes to points scored vs expected, by far best in the league.

Tyler and Oso, as Nevada said on Thursday, are the best passes at their positions in the country. These aren't guys that luck into assists. TK is 6th nationally in assist rate and Oso is a unicorn that allows us to play with two point guards through the center.

Stevie and O-Max are elite on ball defenders who cover up our other defensive deficiencies and happen to be highly efficient on offense as well.

Dauster wrote the Big East preview for Field of 68 and picked us 9th, like many others. No one likes to admit they were wrong, but the national media was wrong and it's about time they accept that reality and acknowledge this team is good and its players have elite level talents.

Reading this post, I can feel Bree hyperventilating :)
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9574
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2023, 11:04:14 PM »
Not just the National media. Some scoopers though we were lacking in the talent department.
MU sucks
Goal is National Championship

Shooter McGavin

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2714
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2023, 01:01:27 AM »
100% Brew.

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5146
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2023, 06:41:07 AM »
Not just the National media. Some scoopers though we were lacking in the talent department.

...and Big East Coaches, some who ranked us less than ninth.

1SE

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2092
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2023, 07:01:31 AM »
I'm glad to see Marquette get attention, but this whole "they're fun plucky underdogs, Shaka has them believing and playing better than they are" is complete BS from people who can't believe this team is actually better than the 9th place they projected us in the preseason.

Our team fights hard and plays great as a unit, but if you don't see the absolutely elite skills on this team you don't know the game.

Kam Jones is top-5 nationally in scoring at the rim and he's the only player under 6'8" in the top-5. Shot Quality ranks him top-5 in shot selection. He is absurd when it comes to points scored vs expected, by far best in the league.

Tyler and Oso, as Nevada said on Thursday, are the best passes at their positions in the country. These aren't guys that luck into assists. TK is 6th nationally in assist rate and Oso is a unicorn that allows us to play with two point guards through the center.

Stevie and O-Max are elite on ball defenders who cover up our other defensive deficiencies and happen to be highly efficient on offense as well.

Dauster wrote the Big East preview for Field of 68 and picked us 9th, like many others. No one likes to admit they were wrong, but the national media was wrong and it's about time they accept that reality and acknowledge this team is good and its players have elite level talents.

I think mich of it is these guys still projection off the sum of  HS rankings rather than realizing the potential for player development and effective coaching. Shaka has excelled both in getting players to exceed their potential as individuals and as a unit
Real Warriors Demand Excellence

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3691
  • NA of course
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2023, 07:21:06 AM »
I believe you can win without talent, and this staff would be capable of doing so, but this team absolutely has loads of it.  The question was how quickly could they develop and that seems to have been answered through 18 games.


I believe you mean win without “projected” talent   The rating “experts” have been wrong once or twice ;)

Then there is that look into a kids heart and potential for growth. Connecting with the right people. As I mentioned in a previous post, many of Bo Ryan’s 4 & 5 * recruits spun their wheels at best with him
don't...don't don't don't don't

Scoop Snoop

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2501
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2023, 07:24:13 AM »
...and Big East Coaches, some who ranked us less than ninth.

Not so fast 69. You were the guy who was so worried about not only the BE coaches' poll but national polls as well. Glad to see you come around, but you are late to the party.
Wild horses couldn't drag me into either political party, but for very different reasons.

"All of our answers are unencumbered by the thought process." NPR's Click and Clack of Car Talk.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22170
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2023, 08:25:52 AM »
I'm glad to see Marquette get attention, but this whole "they're fun plucky underdogs, Shaka has them believing and playing better than they are" is complete BS from people who can't believe this team is actually better than the 9th place they projected us in the preseason.

Our team fights hard and plays great as a unit, but if you don't see the absolutely elite skills on this team you don't know the game.

Kam Jones is top-5 nationally in scoring at the rim and he's the only player under 6'8" in the top-5. Shot Quality ranks him top-5 in shot selection. He is absurd when it comes to points scored vs expected, by far best in the league.

Tyler and Oso, as Nevada said on Thursday, are the best passes at their positions in the country. These aren't guys that luck into assists. TK is 6th nationally in assist rate and Oso is a unicorn that allows us to play with two point guards through the center.

Stevie and O-Max are elite on ball defenders who cover up our other defensive deficiencies and happen to be highly efficient on offense as well.

Dauster wrote the Big East preview for Field of 68 and picked us 9th, like many others. No one likes to admit they were wrong, but the national media was wrong and it's about time they accept that reality and acknowledge this team is good and its players have elite level talents.

I don't know Brew. Fair or unfair, when we talk about "elite talent" in college basketball, all people mean is "5-stars and high 4-stars coming out of high school" and maybe also "highly coveted transfers in the portal". We don't have any of those on our team. I think mentioning that we don't have elite talent is differentiating Shaka from coaches who win by recruiting as many highly ranked high school kids and top portal targets as they can. Taking it a step further, it's not like any of our players were instant stars when they got to college. Oso, nothing his frehsman year. Omax, nothing his freshman year. Kolek, A10 Frosh of the Year but nothing like what we've seen him be here. Kam, one dimensional 6th man for a 9 seed. Stevie, back of rotation player for a 9 seed. Jop, very back of rotation player for a 9 seed. Shaka himself said this team is "made up of 9th place parts". Shaka deserves credit for identifying and developing unrecognized potential.

As for them believing more in UConn, X, or the Dence to win the league, they've earned their way into the converation too by having great seasons so far....but f*ck 'em
« Last Edit: January 15, 2023, 08:27:30 AM by TAMU, the Wizard of MU Basketball »
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


panda

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2023, 08:29:06 AM »
Why doesn’t the national media care as much about my team as I do ?

Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9574
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2023, 08:38:12 AM »
Why doesn’t the national media care as much about my team as I do ?
Because they hate MU
Goal is National Championship

GB Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2309
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2023, 08:41:25 AM »
Why doesn’t the national media care as much about my team as I do ?

East coast bias

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26472
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2023, 09:16:08 AM »
I don't know Brew. Fair or unfair, when we talk about "elite talent" in college basketball, all people mean is "5-stars and high 4-stars coming out of high school" and maybe also "highly coveted transfers in the portal". We don't have any of those on our team. I think mentioning that we don't have elite talent is differentiating Shaka from coaches who win by recruiting as many highly ranked high school kids and top portal targets as they can. Taking it a step further, it's not like any of our players were instant stars when they got to college. Oso, nothing his frehsman year. Omax, nothing his freshman year. Kolek, A10 Frosh of the Year but nothing like what we've seen him be here. Kam, one dimensional 6th man for a 9 seed. Stevie, back of rotation player for a 9 seed. Jop, very back of rotation player for a 9 seed. Shaka himself said this team is "made up of 9th place parts". Shaka deserves credit for identifying and developing unrecognized potential.

As for them believing more in UConn, X, or the Dence to win the league, they've earned their way into the converation too by having great seasons so far....but f*ck 'em

That is what they look at, but it's a stupid view of elite talent. Don't think about what they were coming in, think about what they would be going out. If any of our starters transferred, they would likely be top-10 on every "hot transfer" list. If Jop, Chase, or Sean transferred, high-majors would be chasing all of them.

When you see the unicorn article about Oso, when Dauster says Kolek is the best point guard in the Big East, when Kam scores the way that he does, those players who came in unsung become elite. It would be like saying Zach Edey isn't an elite player because of his high school rating. It's just silly, myopic, and wrong.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

nycwarrior

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2023, 09:59:06 AM »
The narrative may indeed be lazy and self serving for analysts and coaches who didn’t see the magic brewing with Shaka, Nevada Smith and everyone at the Al.

There’s an interesting contrast between the conversations around Kentucky’s underperformance under Calipari this year and the perceived over performance by Shaka’s team at MU.

The “fire Cal” fans at UK are shocked that the top ranked individual players they’ve added around the NPOY aren’t finding roles that mesh well enough to play as a team and win.

Shaka’s team at MU is over performing expectations because - based on the measurable (recruiting service stars) that was being considered - this team was seen as less proven than last year’s.

Some of you guys saw it very early. Kudos. Many of us wanted to believe but weren’t sure (I fit here). I think it’s fair for the National Media to have been skeptical early. It’s not like the success Shaka is having here is 100% analogous to what he did at Texas. I’m glad to see them coming around.

Goose

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10570
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2023, 10:15:09 AM »
nycwarrior

I think it has a lot to do with laziness and going with chalk. I have said numerous times, but if Oso, Kolek and Omax were incoming transfers vs. returning the guys I believe the MU fanbase would have been jacked after watching their highlights from last season. Unfortunately, some or many remembered Feb/March and not the upside these guys showed last season.

I got mocked up until 6-7 games ago about my saying over and over again that Omax is an NBA talent. Oso should real upside last season and Kolek is a winner on top of being an outstanding talent. In addition, we saw enough of the Shaka system to know what the future looked like and what the potential could be.


The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11982
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2023, 10:41:36 AM »
It’s laziness sure. But these guys aren’t paid to understand the rosters of all these teams pre-season and accurately predict where they will fall. They just look at who left and who is coming in and draw conclusions accordingly.

And that’s fine. IMO there isn’t anything less compelling from a sports media perspective than preseason predictions.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26472
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2023, 10:50:27 AM »
It’s laziness sure. But these guys aren’t paid to understand the rosters of all these teams pre-season and accurately predict where they will fall. They just look at who left and who is coming in and draw conclusions accordingly.

And that’s fine. IMO there isn’t anything less compelling from a sports media perspective than preseason predictions.

Field of 68 put out The Almanac this year, which was supposed to do just that. It was based on the type of preseason work the Three Man Weave (Jim Root, Ky McKeown, and Matt Cox) crew put out on a yearly basis. The difference was that 3MW did dig into all those rosters deep and knew all the teams, all the leagues, and all the styles. Their preseason work was amazing and incredibly deep. In The Almanac, the leagues done by 3MW alumni were just as good as ever, but many of the high-major leagues were taken on by national types like Dauster and Goodman, and there simply wasn't the analytical depth.

This is much of my disappointment with Fo68. They took over what had been an unbelievably deep product and didn't do as good of a job. I understand that to talk to all the coaches nationally, guys like Dauster and Goodman have the cachet to get a Bill Self, John Calipari, or Tom Izzo on the phone while Jim Root might not be able to, but that loss of analytical depth really hurt the end product.

It's also why I prefer 3MW's podcast, where they've been talking for weeks about how awesome our offense is and what a joy it is to watch. The national people that pay attention across the board do see what we are, it's the lazy takes from people who are paid to cover the entirety of the sport that irritate me.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: The Field of 68 on Marquette
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2023, 10:56:41 AM »
I want Kentucky's 5* roster.  ;D

 

feedback