Oso planning to go pro
Disagree. The assumption is the journalist was following the van to determine the addresses/identities of jurors. Attorneys on both sides, and the judge and jurors were targeted and subjected to unwarranted flak. We need to protect the sanctity of the jury process. It’s the cornerstone of our democracy. So some asshat following them home isn’t intimidation while they are deliberating? I can’t even reply to a juror that says “hello” on the elevator while trying a case without being sanctioned if called on it. Wait until the case is over before any attempt to communicate with jurors.
Lol no. A producer following a bus isn’t intimidation. And has nothing to do what you can or cannot do on an elevator. It was inappropriate and the network was sanctioned for it. But that’s about it.
Rocky, there are numerous examples of people creating a narrative in the media during and after the verdict. There's no reason to go into it but that's completely different than talking about specific facts. Whether it be the criminal records of those killed or Rittenhouse lying about specific details of his life.
Then you really don’t get what it’s like to be a juror. Especially in a case like this one.
Ok, but back to brining up the records of those shot, isn't that just the media using "facts" to spin a narrative? The answer is yes, because those facts have nothing to do with the case. Back to my point of "the media is bad", also "The guys he shot were bad, I heard it from the media". None of this is relevant to the case, and it's a big lol complaining about the media.
There was a reason they ran a red light chasing a bus with the jurors aboard and anyone with half an eye and half an ass knows what it was. Get names, addresses and intimidate. Once the verdict was in intimidation is off the table. Thankfully the judge got it. You and I get it. And while Fluffy claims he doesn’t I don’t for a minute believe that. He’s smarter than that - he’s just being stubborn.
And that's the crux of it. I'm smart. And you're...slow.It's not intimidation. It's inappropriate, but hardly illegal.
The real crux of it is I’m honest, so I admit you’re smart even if you’re a stubborn pain in the ass.And you’re dishonest, because you know I’m smart also… smarter than you in any way smart can be measured.It was an attempt to intimidate, thwarted only because the car following the jurors was stopped for running a red light in pursuit of the bus carrying the jurors to their homes. Look, you based your opinion on your false assumption that the jurors were headed to their hotel. How would following them to their hotel be intimidating? But your logic was based on fake news. When you follow them home and get names and addresses? That was the goal and that would be a clear attempt to intimidate. But if you can’t (or stubbornly refuse to) connect obvious dots I was wrong and you’re not smart at all.
Kinda reminds me of someone…https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-called-smart-six-times-before/story?id=52209712
Fox News didn't find the need to follow the bus. Pretty much sez it all, aina?
Oh, do tell us of your experience as an OJ juror.Could someone in the "Paranoia, Inc." faction of Scoop explain why and how an MSNBC producer would intimidate jurors?
Oh, maybe to get a guilty verdict. If the trial was going bad for Rittenhouse, I have no doubt Fox would have done something similar.Kind of like when the president stated he was not following the facts of the case, but then issues a statement that says this "While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included,". Why would he feel angry at a verdict in a case in which he did not follow the facts?
Cheap shot. Expect better from you.
Kind of like when the president stated he was not following the facts of the case, but then issues a statement that says this "While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included,". Why would he feel angry at a verdict in a case in which he did not follow the facts?
Here's a nice article:https://corporate.findlaw.com/law-library/the-public-s-right-of-access-to-juror-information-loses-more.html