Oso planning to go pro
Kyrie is a slightly better version of Stephon Marbury. Still a very good player and an all-star, but not a Superstar who can be the big dog on an NBA Champion.
I don't disagree with this. I don't think he's a leader.Honestly, personalities aside, play style I think he could work with KD. The Warriors have been using KD as a point forward for awhile. Curry is obviously still a PG, but is playing off the ball more. I could see this working with Kyrie and KD. They can switch off being on the ball, play much more fluid and break down defenders if needed. Add a reliable 3 and D guy and you could have a nice veteran core there.
Kyrie is one of the best ball handling/scoring talents the league has seen in a decade plus, not just a gunner.
Sorry but I just don't believe this statement.
Of course you don't. You just compared him to a player who can't hold a candle to him and was never even top 5 at his position. Kyrie just averaged 24-5-7 with a 48/40/88 slash, coming off a major injury. His attitude is problematic and crapty and he's had a bad series, but to diminish him as a player and talent as a result of that is dumb.The Cavs don't win that championship without him, period. I already said I don't think he'll ever be "the man" on a championship team, but I also think that about James Harden.Watch Kyrie's highlights. He does things that pretty much nobody else in the league can do from a scoring perspective at his size. And its pretty established among the opinions of his peers that he has the best handle in the NBA.
Yeah none that f this really supports your initial statement.
I stated he's one of the best ball handlers in a decade. Go ahead, name some better. Again, this has been an NBA consensus since his first All Star season in Year 2.https://theundefeated.com/features/kyrie-irving-dribbling-cleveland-cavaliers/He's the best scoring "small" guard since AI. He's top 30 in career PPG average. On that list, other than AI, the only comparably sized guys on that list are Lillard and Curry. Both shoot substantially more 3s than Kyrie (30% of his FGA), Lillard around 40% of his FG attemps while Curry is closer to 50. He's a super crafty scorer who actually does a ton around the rim and in the midrange despite probably realistically being 6'2.You could say he's a cancer. You could say he's not a team player. But dude can absolutely ball at an elite level. He's on a HOF arc statistically if he does this another 5-6 years.
You know that just saying the same thing multiple times doesn’t really prove something.
Neither does your failure to provide any evidence to the contrary other to say “I don’t believe you” and stick to an already proven false comparison
This feels like a weird argument. Unless voters are going to contextualize this entire era because of scoring proliferation, he's undoubtedly on a HOF pace.
Cool. But in the end, your weak arguments didn't change my mind.
Also, OT, but saw this on ESPN today. I'm unclear what impressive stats they're referring to, but ok. http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/26695886/harry-froling-now-confident-nba-capabilities
lol, am i to understand this isn't just some sort of very cruel, long practical joke that this Nick Metallinos fellow is playing on Harry Froling?
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
If this was the NCAA tournament, the celtics would have won already
That is funny.To 82's comment, that was one piss poorly coached team. Was it Stevens fault? Irving? Tatum?