Scholarship table
And the NFL referees, who went and watched the replay and made the call, and I, and 4+ other posters on here, are all wrong and you're absolutely right.My bad.We get it. You're the local NFL expert, worked in the Bears front office, etc. You're wrong here though. It's okay, it happens. But your word isn't Gospel. You also wanted to put a million dollars down on the Jets having the worst record in the NFL this year and gawked at anybody who even suggested that some horrible teams could take 1 bad injury to one of their few good players and accidentally win 1 or 2 games and be worse.You're a smart NFL guy. But your solution to the problem of a team correctly challenging a play but having it burn them as a result as leaving the incorrectly called, challenged play as that incorrect call is absurd and it's confusing why they would ever do that. Even if MerritsMustache wants to play some passive aggressive crap as a response. You have it wrong.
I read what he said. I thought he was saying that he was out prior to him fumbling. He was not questioning if the entire play can be reviewed.
I, unlike you, will admit when I'm wrong. I've called myself out multiple times, and put my money where my mouth is by donating to charity when I was wrong.The former head of officiating said it was a bad call. I don't know what else you want. If you don't like my football thoughts, hit ignore.
I have no issue admitting when I'm wrong. I'm not wrong here.
He said it was a bad call, but not for the reason you said it was a bad call that got this conversation started. He simply said Howard should have been called out of bounds before losing possession. Your complaint was that the officials should not have been allowed to rule on possession because that's not what was challenged.So, you're right that Blandino disagreed with the call, and wrong that his disagreement backs your position.
The fumble out of the end zone touchback is a terrible rule anyway
49'ers out of the owen column. Any time Jerra's cowboys lose, it is a good day. That guy has done the impossible. Made me feel sympathy for the Roger.
Jones voted to extend Goodell's contract in May - all the owners did. This was after the initial round of protests and TV ratings started to slip. It was after he laughably executed his power during deflate-gate. Simply put, Goodell is no different now than he was six months ago.However it was before Goodell suspended Ezekiel Elliot. The transparency of Jones' motivations are pretty clear. And what's funny is that I (and many other here) have been saying he's been incompetent for years. Dating back before the Ray Rice video issue.But you know which Scooper was one of his biggest defenders? Care to guess?http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=41989.msg568605#msg568605
a lot has happened in the almost 4 years since that evaluation was made...A LOT ! there are some here, whom i assume were married and divorced within that time frame-and that was for better or worse eyn"er?so you're gonna hold someone to their word based on a 4 year gap? what if it came up that rodger dodger and weinersteens were "drinkin buds" ?
4 years ago, whenever you posted, we wondered who the new guy with the grammar problem was. Now we know.