MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: tower912 on October 18, 2019, 08:54:15 AM

Title: Malaise
Post by: tower912 on October 18, 2019, 08:54:15 AM
I decided to start a new thread where we can hash this out rather than continuing to pollute the recruiting thread with another tangent.

Why do some posters seem to revel more in Wojo's recruiting misses than his successes?

Why do so few care about Markus being a preseason first team AA?

Why do some hope Wojo does just well enough to be hired away?

Why do some continue to defend those who left while being derogatory to those who stayed? 

We are just a few weeks from the start of the season and we are busier parsing LeBron's thoughts on China than we are discussing potential rotations, who starts at the 4, who starts at the 5, zone options.  Why?

This is a fringe   top 25 preseason team with a high ceiling.  All some posters care about is a game against an unknown opponent 6 months away?

Is it Wojo? 
Are we tired of each other and scoop?   
Have all the basketball discussions been done before?   
Is it reflective of society around us?   
Even though we officially don't talk politics, is it bleeding through in our opinions about sports, each other, scoop?

Is it the years, the Crean vs. Buzz vs. Wojo debates having a cumulative effect?

Is it a couple of posters?

To me, this is becoming a joyless place.   Will winning change that?  24 wins didn't.  It made it worse.

A frustrating malaise.   

What is your complaint about MU hoops? 
 What is your solution? 
 Do you honestly believe there is a coach out there that is markedly better who would come to MU?   Name names.

But keep it here.   Let the recruiting thread be about recruiting.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Jockey on October 18, 2019, 09:13:45 AM
I decided to start a new thread where we can hash this out rather than continuing to pollute the recruiting thread with another tangent.

Why do some posters seem to revel more in Wojo's recruiting misses than his successes?

Why do so few care about Markus being a preseason first team AA?

Why do some hope Wojo does just well enough to be hired away?

Why do some continue to defend those who left while being derogatory to those who stayed? 

We are just a few weeks from the start of the season and we are busier parsing LeBron's thoughts on China than we are discussing potential rotations, who starts at the 4, who starts at the 5, zone options.  Why?

This is a fringe   top 25 preseason team with a high ceiling.  All some posters care about is a game against an unknown opponent 6 months away?

Is it Wojo? 
Are we tired of each other and scoop?   
Have all the basketball discussions been done before?   
Is it reflective of society around us?   
Even though we officially don't talk politics, is it bleeding through in our opinions about sports, each other, scoop?

To me, this is becoming a joyless place.   Will winning change that?  24 wins didn't.  It made it worse.

A frustrating malaise.   

What is your complaint about MU hoops? 
 What is your solution? 
 Do you honestly believe there is a coach out there that is markedly better who would come to MU?   Name names.

But keep it here.   Let the recruiting thread be about recruiting.


I have no complaints against MU basketball. I agree they should be a top 25 team. I think recruiting for next year is progressing well. I don't care that the Hausers left. No doubt they had talent - but I'm glad their entitled attitude left with them. I think we will be better off for that happening.

There is both malaise and anger. We all known who is the driver for that (I don't mean chico). It carries over to almost every aspect of our lives - including sports and personal interactions. My entire life, personal politics had a 0% effect on my personal relationships. That has completely changed.

I will not let it ruin sports for me. If others want to do that, I want no part of it.


On a sporting level, it is a great, great time to be a sports fan in Wisconsin.
1) Marquette should be a top 25 team.
2) GB will be one of the Super Bowl favorites as the season goes on.
3) Bucks have a very good chance for an NBA title.
4) Brewers made the playoffs again.
5) Wisconsin has a very realistic chance for the football playoff.
6) We have Rodgers - not Trubiskey or Cousins.
7) We don't have the Cubs, White Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks, Illini, Northwestern, etc.

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 09:24:08 AM
Because people are getting older and crotchety

Because it's preseason and expected after being an AA last year. I care more that he wasn't preseason BE POY

This thought process is idiotic

Because the Hausers were two players WI brothers and I think a lot of people instinctively feel Howard and Wojo wronged them since it's the only reason they would've left.

Don't even have a theory on this one

I think people are placing too much emphasis on Tournament than the whole picture

Wojo isn't mr media personality. I'm sure that's a factor especially with the Al groupies.
Yes we are
Yes they have

Yes it yes
Yes it bleeds in way too much

People are too stuck in the past

There are a few posters that do make this place bad. Say what you want about guru and his opinions that don't make sense at least you can feel his passion. Guys like 4ever drive apathy

No it won't not till we have a sweet 16

My complaint is that we aren't as open to the media anymore.
Another documentary
No I do not. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 09:25:36 AM

I have no complaints against MU basketball. I agree they should be a top 25 team. I think recruiting for next year is progressing well. I don't care that the Hausers left. No doubt they had talent - but I'm glad their entitled attitude left with them. I think we will be better off for that happening.

There is both malaise and anger. We all known who is the driver for that (I don't mean chico). It carries over to almost every aspect of our lives - including sports and personal interactions. My entire life, personal politics had a 0% effect on my personal relationships. That has completely changed.

I will not let it ruin sports for me. If others want to do that, I want no part of it.


On a sporting level, it is a great, great time to be a sports fan in Wisconsin.
1) Marquette should be a top 25 team.
2) GB will be one of the Super Bowl favorites as the season goes on.
3) Bucks have a very good chance for an NBA title.
4) Brewers made the playoffs again.
5) Wisconsin has a very realistic chance for the football playoff.
6) We have Rodgers - not Trubiskey or Cousins.
7) We don't have the Cubs, White Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks, Illini, Northwestern, etc.

Why you gotta hate the Hawks they have no impact on a WI team?!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Jockey on October 18, 2019, 09:30:09 AM
Why you gotta hate the Hawks they have no impact on a WI team?!

 ;D

Actually, when it comes to the Hawks, I will admit to being a bandwagon fan. If they are doing well, I'm there. If not, I'm gone.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Its DJOver on October 18, 2019, 09:41:37 AM
I think that there are a number of positive posters that either take the entire off-season off, or cut way back, and it leads to the negative Nancy's being more prevalent.  I also don't think it's a coincidence that it has aligned with the return of a number of (in)famous posters from hiatus.  Getting threads off topic is no big deal, but when certain posters do it, you automatically know that there is 0% chance of it being salvaged, and 100% chance that it ends up as a pissing match (which I just then don't even bother keeping up with).
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: mu_hilltopper on October 18, 2019, 10:09:32 AM
These are really good questions. 

I think the summary is .. yes, there is a malaise.   

As I wrote in another thread .. I dropped my season tickets that I had for 19 years, due to the many factors that generated this malaise, where all I really wanted to see was 3-4 games a year. 

Crean built up the "family" character, then left.  Buzz did the same, then left.  Wojo's time will end similarly, with the constant mantra of how "special" Marquette is, but he will absolutely leave when given a good opportunity.  And frankly, Wojo is patient zero on the malaise plague, fair or not.

Besides Wisconsin, MU doesn't have any other real "rivalries."  We can enjoy a game against Nova, but they are just flat better than us.     Gosh, I can't wait to play Butler and Creighton this year.

Players good and bad leave the program all the time.   Recruiting is interesting, but we've had plenty of good guys before without success.   MU hasn't won a NCAA game in 2,395 days.   Expectations are high, but it's also entirely possible MU flops this year.

Marquette is in the Arby's phase of its existence. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: #UnleashSean on October 18, 2019, 10:14:38 AM
I think hilltopper sums this up pretty good. The new big east is not that of the old.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 18, 2019, 10:19:57 AM

I have no complaints against MU basketball. I agree they should be a top 25 team. I think recruiting for next year is progressing well. I don't care that the Hausers left. No doubt they had talent - but I'm glad their entitled attitude left with them. I think we will be better off for that happening.

There is both malaise and anger. We all known who is the driver for that (I don't mean chico). It carries over to almost every aspect of our lives - including sports and personal interactions. My entire life, personal politics had a 0% effect on my personal relationships. That has completely changed.

I will not let it ruin sports for me. If others want to do that, I want no part of it.


On a sporting level, it is a great, great time to be a sports fan in Wisconsin.
1) Marquette should be a top 25 team.
2) GB will be one of the Super Bowl favorites as the season goes on.
3) Bucks have a very good chance for an NBA title.
4) Brewers made the playoffs again.
5) Wisconsin has a very realistic chance for the football playoff.
6) We have Rodgers - not Trubiskey or Cousins.
7) We don't have the Cubs, White Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks, Illini, Northwestern, etc.

I could not agree with you more, however, when the institution I love gets political it is hard to avoid it. Primary example changing our mascot from Warriors to Golden Eagles was a political statement which still does not sit well with many and I concede older alumni.  I hope the Golden Eagles do us proud this season.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: ZiggysFryBoy on October 18, 2019, 10:26:13 AM
I blame Chicos, because why not.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Benny B on October 18, 2019, 10:48:27 AM
I don't call it malaise... I call it "Wisconsin Hedge Syndrome."  It's when someone rags and rags and rags on their team whether they have a reason to or not... that way if their team has an amazing year, they feel good because it was an amazing year;but if it's a terrible year, they still feel good because they "were right all along."

It's actually quite depressing to see the lengths people will go to in order to avoid depression.



Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on October 18, 2019, 11:09:34 AM
(https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2014-06/26/15/enhanced/webdr07/anigif_enhanced-15382-1403812659-24.gif?downsize=700:*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto)
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: MUfan12 on October 18, 2019, 11:26:57 AM
This is the least excited I've been about a season since I can remember. Last year did a number on me. Wojo lost control of the locker room, the chemistry went to sh*t, and the team tanked when it matters. There's blame all around, but to say Wojo misjudged the depth of the Hausers displeasure is drastically understating it.

We have a guy who was great assistant coach, and is likely out of his depth as a head coach. And publicly is about as exciting as unbuttered toast most of the time. If the results are gonna be mediocre, at least be someone we like. That's probably why people have been harder on him than Crean/Buzz.

It's great Markus is a preseason AA. Let's see if it leads to something greater than a f*ckload of attempts and points.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 18, 2019, 11:30:12 AM
These are really good questions. 

I think the summary is .. yes, there is a malaise.   

As I wrote in another thread .. I dropped my season tickets that I had for 19 years, due to the many factors that generated this malaise, where all I really wanted to see was 3-4 games a year. 

Crean built up the "family" character, then left.  Buzz did the same, then left.  Wojo's time will end similarly, with the constant mantra of how "special" Marquette is, but he will absolutely leave when given a good opportunity.  And frankly, Wojo is patient zero on the malaise plague, fair or not.

Besides Wisconsin, MU doesn't have any other real "rivalries."  We can enjoy a game against Nova, but they are just flat better than us.     Gosh, I can't wait to play Butler and Creighton this year.

Players good and bad leave the program all the time.   Recruiting is interesting, but we've had plenty of good guys before without success.   MU hasn't won a NCAA game in 2,395 days.   Expectations are high, but it's also entirely possible MU flops this year.

Marquette is in the Arby's phase of its existence.

It never did! Name one other on a regular basis as Wisconsin that we actually looked forward to over the last 50 years.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 11:45:59 AM
It never did! Name one other on a regular basis as Wisconsin that we actually looked forward to over the last 50 years.

Notre Dame. I know there were a couple missed years but in 50yrs I'd put them at a close number two.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Golden Avalanche on October 18, 2019, 11:49:27 AM
Most adult Americans are generally unhappy with their lives and as you age it's only a matter of time until Marquette basketball goes from useful distraction of their tepid existence to swallowed whole into the ether of their pointlessness.

Given the atmosphere, it's no shock the last six to 18 months has seen many Scoopers make this transition. Thus, malaise.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on October 18, 2019, 11:51:36 AM
It never did! Name one other on a regular basis as Wisconsin that we actually looked forward to over the last 50 years.

For a long period of time, I looked forward to the annual games against Cincy & Louisville.  Those were always dog-fights.

I would say that I am very interested in SHU this year.  That one has always been chipy, but starting to feel more like the Cincy games of old.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on October 18, 2019, 11:59:00 AM
I think it's understandable. We've been in a slow rebuild and patience wears thin. Then we start winning and winning a lot. On February 26th we were on the verge of being a top 10 team, winning the Big East, and earning a top 3 seed in the NCAA tournament (meaning a very good chance at Wojo's first tourney victory). People started to hope after years of nothing special. Then the wheels came off. Smashed any and all hope in spectacular fashion, culminating in the embarrassment against Murray State.

But the hope smashing wasn't over. We could at least take comfort in most of the roster coming back and every national pundit pegging us as a preseason top 10 team.....until Hausergate. More hope destroyed. Yeah we are still a preseason top 25 team, but that rings a little hollow after starting the offseason as a preseason top 10 team. It's still good...but you can't help and think about what you were before.

Long story short, it will take a lot of winning and finishing a season strong before people start to hope again.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 12:04:40 PM
Am I the only one who thinks the team that was best set up at the right time to win a tournament game was the NIT team unfortunately?
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Spotcheck Billy on October 18, 2019, 12:22:51 PM
Notre Dame. I know there were a couple missed years but in 50yrs I'd put them at a close number two.

But do domers think it was a rivalry the same as MU fans? Has to work both ways to be a real rival.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 12:32:31 PM
But do domers think it was a rivalry the same as MU fans? Has to work both ways to be a real rival.

Seemed like it when I was there for the games and my friend would come to MU. But small sample size
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 18, 2019, 12:54:29 PM
My perspective:

Message boards, the internet, are inherently neutral. However, they provide an immediate 24/7 outlet to anyone. This includes negative, impulsive responses. Those people have always existed. They just didn’t have the vehicle.

These same people are often the same way with their other fandoms and life happenings. For some having a scapegoat allows them to not blame themselves for whatever else is going on in their lives.

There are people here who get riled by Bucky, ND, MU coaches, other sports teams, you name it for different reasons but many as some form of rejection.

Some want to see MU succeed at Buzz’ postseason levels. Wojo hasn’t yet done that. For some it is that simple.

With regards to recruiting, some get way too caught up in who MU targets, and their ranking, as if they needed others to decide who can and can’t succeed at this level. It’s also the off season.

As for individual awards, not sure. I’ve never personally been interested in individual awards in sports, movies, music, anything. I know who and what I like. I am all for the positive promotion of all things MU. So go Markus! and anything else.

I have said before, I’d like MU to be consistent top 25 team, annually. That is goal one. Goal two is be a 2nd weekend team. Compete for league titles, be strong in big games and with rivals.

But back to the original point, people can laugh all they want but fear of abandonment, rejection etc...are in my opinion some reasons for the tons of posts from certain posters that are negative Nancy or Debbie downer if you will. Much of it is anticipatory fear which often doesn’t come to fruition. But when it does.....here are also some excessive defending positive paul’s too.

No recruit is a must get in anything.

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Jockey on October 18, 2019, 01:00:56 PM
I could not agree with you more, however, when the institution I love gets political it is hard to avoid it. Primary example changing our mascot from Warriors to Golden Eagles was a political statement which still does not sit well with many and I concede older alumni.  I hope the Golden Eagles do us proud this season.

Good post, 69. Maybe drawing too fine of a line, but I think it was political correctness run amok rather than politics.

Warriors, with an Indian mascot, has no place in modern society. We don’t need team names that reflect race. Warriors, in a generic sense though, is 100% appropriate.

I don’t want this thread turn into another battle over the name, though.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 18, 2019, 02:15:04 PM
With regards to why isn't there more perceived buzz for this year's team.

1) Lack of NCAA success for many years turns to frustration, which turns to apathy.

2) Two players who had significant roles left after a season in which MU peaked early and faded late. MU had the regular season Big East Title in the bag and blew it. They were absolutely throttled in NCAA first round.  Expectations went from deep NCAA run this season to let's make it first.

3) The league isn't coming off of one of its better seasons. It was a big blow when league changed to what it is now. As long as many league teams are NCAA teams, that can be overcome somewhat.

In my opinion, a strong season with a 2nd weekend NCAA appearance will get some people excited again.

I believe MU can be very good. The keys for me are shooting the basketball, in particular from 3 and from the FT line. I don't see much FT discussion. It is easily one of my biggest concerns.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: GooooMarquette on October 18, 2019, 02:19:22 PM

To me, this is becoming a joyless place.   Will winning change that?  24 wins didn't.  It made it worse.

A frustrating malaise.   

What is your complaint about MU hoops? 
 What is your solution? 
 Do you honestly believe there is a coach out there that is markedly better who would come to MU?   Name names.

But keep it here.   Let the recruiting thread be about recruiting.



You gotta start posting in the NM thread. Pure, unmitigated joy.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: tower912 on October 18, 2019, 02:26:02 PM
I started the NM thread.   IIRC, it was originally a snarky dig at Crean that I regretted shortly after posting.   I wanted to delete it, but instead deleted my post and changed the title to NM.   The rest, as they say.....
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: cheebs09 on October 18, 2019, 02:26:11 PM
As strange as it may sound, I feel this board is more optimistic than the general Marquette fan. Based on what I overhear from friends, people at games, and students, there isn’t a ton of excitement in the fan base. Kind of a “I’ll tune in, but don’t have my hopes up.”

I think it really stems from the lack of NCAA wins and how the season ended last year. It was a “I knew it was too good to be true” type of feeling. Losing the Hausers is just an extra kick to the nuts.

I hope Wojo is the guy and has a long career here. However, we need more than a few bright spots with otherwise mediocre results.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: mu_hilltopper on October 18, 2019, 02:28:33 PM
It never did! Name one other on a regular basis as Wisconsin that we actually looked forward to over the last 50 years.

I very much looked forward to games against Louisville, even though they owned us.  When Huggins was @Cincy, those were acrimonious games too.  Notre Dame. 
 If 50 years is your time horizon, DePaul.     

Most adult Americans are generally unhappy with their lives and as you age it's only a matter of time until Marquette basketball goes from useful distraction of their tepid existence to swallowed whole into the ether of their pointlessness.


Mmmmm, Arby's.

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: GooooMarquette on October 18, 2019, 02:31:08 PM
I started the NM thread.   IIRC, it was originally a snarky dig at Crean that I regretted shortly after posting.   I wanted to delete it, but instead deleted my post and changed the title to NM.   The rest, as they say.....



But now you can post about so much more.

Arby's, apple varieties, bloody Marys, horror movies. That thread has it all!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Jockey on October 18, 2019, 02:51:47 PM
With regards to why isn't there more perceived buzz for this year's team.


2) Two players who had significant roles left after a season in which MU peaked early and faded late. MU had the regular season Big East Title in the bag and blew it. They were absolutely throttled in NCAA first round.  Expectations went from deep NCAA run this season to let's make it first.


The keys for me are shooting the basketball, in particular from 3 and from the FT line. I don't see much FT discussion. It is easily one of my biggest concerns.

I think they were sabotaged rather than they blew it.


3s will be interesting with the line moving back this year. Shouldn’t affect MH too much, but other guys may struggle a bit. I think defense and transition with mitigate the loss of some of the 3s.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 02:56:14 PM
I think they were sabotaged rather than they blew it.


3s will be interesting with the line moving back this year. Shouldn’t affect MH too much, but other guys may struggle a bit. I think defense and transition with mitigate the loss of some of the 3s.

The thing is if there was ever a year to be a low post and driving team this might be it. Go back to the high percentage shots rather than adjust on the fly to the new line
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cooby Snacks on October 18, 2019, 02:57:06 PM
Agree with a lot of what's posted above.

If you just look at last season's W/L record, it was honestly an archetypal Crean/Buzz year. Crean, for all his faults, got somewhat of a pass since the Big East was still shiny and new for us (Remember 2006-07? It played out very similarly to last season). Buzz, for all his faults, got a pass because he was winning games in March. Wojo has neither of those going for him at this point.

A couple other factors in my lack of enthusiasm for MU hoops that are beyond the program's control:

1. College basketball refereeing is so profoundly awful that it's killing any joy in the sport for me. I moved away, so I can only watch on TV, but even that's hard to sit through when I know at least 15 minutes is going to be footage of some overworked-but-not-very-competent-to-begin-with ref's a** bent over the scorer's table.

2. Have you seen the Bucks lately? Holy s*** they're amazing.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Pakuni on October 18, 2019, 03:10:06 PM
This definitely isn't exclusive to Marquette, but for some people the joy of sports is complaining about sports. Without these people, sports talk radio would get about 10 percent of the callers it does. Some of these same people are Scoopers. And that's fine. Everyone is free to enjoy sports whichever way they wish.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 03:16:02 PM
This definitely isn't exclusive to Marquette, but for some people the joy of sports is complaining about sports. Without these people, sports talk radio would get about 10 percent of the callers it does. Some of these same people are Scoopers. And that's fine. Everyone is free to enjoy sports whichever way they wish.

Interesting perspective and I thoroughly agree.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: 4everwarriors on October 18, 2019, 03:18:56 PM
Because people are getting older and crotchety

Because it's preseason and expected after being an AA last year. I care more that he wasn't preseason BE POY

This thought process is idiotic

Because the Hausers were two players WI brothers and I think a lot of people instinctively feel Howard and Wojo wronged them since it's the only reason they would've left.

Don't even have a theory on this one

I think people are placing too much emphasis on Tournament than the whole picture

Wojo isn't mr media personality. I'm sure that's a factor especially with the Al groupies.
Yes we are
Yes they have

Yes it yes
Yes it bleeds in way too much

People are too stuck in the past

There are a few posters that do make this place bad. Say what you want about guru and his opinions that don't make sense at least you can feel his passion. Guys like 4ever drive apathy

No it won't not till we have a sweet 16

My complaint is that we aren't as open to the media anymore.
Another documentary
No I do not.


Apathy? Far from it. Wojo hasn't shown he can get it done. Yes, some sporadic flashes, but no consistency. 5 years without a Tourney win and Hauser-Gate will absolutely bury him. I could go on and on. Luckily, for him, he has the backing of the current administration. I wish, those of you who have never enjoyed the excitement and energy of big time, winning basketball, get the opportunity, in your lifetime, to experience it. Unfortunately, Billy Packer, some years ago, may have nailed the state of MU basketball. For the record, Davis crossed us off his list a week ago.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Billy Hoyle on October 18, 2019, 03:24:41 PM
I could not agree with you more, however, when the institution I love gets political it is hard to avoid it. Primary example changing our mascot from Warriors to Golden Eagles was a political statement which still does not sit well with many and I concede older alumni.  I hope the Golden Eagles do us proud this season.

was it a "political" statement or just a response to changing societal attitudes and requests from the Native American community (especially those the Jesuits worked with in South Dakota that made the request)? I feel like some of those hanging on to the nickname issue, 26 years later, just use it as a convenient excuse not to support MU, especially financially. They weren't going to give or come to games in the first place, now they have their excuse. It's kind of like people who boycott certain businesses because of a political decision.  For example, the right-wing crowd that vowed to boycott Nordstrom for no longer carrying Ivanka Trump merchandise or left-wingers who boycott restaurants like Chik-Fil-A or Jimmy John's for their stances or actions. You weren't going to shop/eat there anyway.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Litehouse on October 18, 2019, 03:30:51 PM
Hausershima has sucked some joy out of looking forward to this year.  We'll still be good, but we could have been great, so that's a let down.  Having grown up in central WI, cheering for kids from central WI made following our team more entertaining for me.  Sam was my daughters favorite player and she picked jersey #10 on her youth team because of him.  Plus, the collapse at the end of last year certainly didn't help build the excitement for this year.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 03:34:02 PM

Apathy? Far from it. Wojo hasn't shown he can get it done. Yes, some sporadic flashes, but no consistency. 5 years without a Tourney win and Hauser-Gate will absolutely bury him. I could go on and on. Luckily, for him, he has the backing of the current administration. I wish, those of you who have never enjoyed the excitement and energy of big time, winning basketball, get the opportunity, in your lifetime, to experience it. Unfortunately, Billy Packer, some years ago, may have nailed the state of MU basketball. For the record, Davis crossed us off his list a week ago.

Your consistent negativity and glee from wojos failures inspire apathy. I stand by that. Not questioning that you love Marquette just that you don't have unconditional support of whoever is on that court.

At our best we played only a handful of good teams during the "big time years" every season compared to the Buzz and Crean years. the success you remember is like Gonzaga's now. Amazing plastic records and a couple phenomenal runs.

I don't claim to know anything about Hausergate but two players leaving shouldn't bury a coach unless you'd like to expand on something that is truly awful.

Bummer about Davis, hope we snag someone else. If not I'll roll with who we have, if Wojo leaves I'll roll with the next coach. Rather than take enjoyment out of failures. But hey if Porter Moser can do it then I think Wojos better than him
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: mu_hilltopper on October 18, 2019, 03:38:13 PM
In the end .. winning (in March) solves a lot of problems.

The Crean/Buzz years raised the fan base's expectations, and the past ~7 years have ended with disappointment, drama, and/or excuses. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: 4everwarriors on October 18, 2019, 03:42:22 PM
"Unconditional support," hell no. I'm not a sheep or a follower in anything. I can and do think for myself. With regards to Wojo, it's obvious. He's out of his league.
BTW, and I seriously do not mean this in a condescending way, but your youth and naïveté is showing.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 03:49:46 PM
"Unconditional support," hell no. I'm not a sheep or a follower in anything. I can and do think for myself. With regards to Wojo, it's obvious. He's out of his league.
BTW, and I seriously do not mean this in a condescending way, but your youth and naïveté is showing.

What is naive And youthful? Claiming that a team that was independent and playing only a couple ranked teams had an overblown record? That's true via research.

Claiming that two transfers shouldn't bury a coach? I invite more elaboration to teach me so I'm not naive.

Saying that I will roll with whoever's on the team? That's sticking by my alma matter. If you don't want to stick by them unconditionally good for you, you be that non sheep non follower but that doesn't mean that your comments don't inspire apathy. And I don't take it as condescending unless you're refusing to help fix my "naïveté" in which case then it's just meant to be insulting rather than a teaching moment.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: 4everwarriors on October 18, 2019, 03:56:08 PM
Hopefully your naïveté will auto correct with age and life's experiences.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 18, 2019, 04:01:46 PM
I think they were sabotaged rather than they blew it.


3s will be interesting with the line moving back this year. Shouldn’t affect MH too much, but other guys may struggle a bit. I think defense and transition with mitigate the loss of some of the 3s.

This thread had hope at the beginning, sigh...but I will try to bring it back a little here...for me, I envision more driving and dishing to bigs and short jumpers...but I also envision hack an MU big or non big and make them knock down 2 FT's each time...not give up that easy bucket. I like to see the number 8 as the first number in a FT %
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 04:02:37 PM
Hopefully your naïveté will auto correct with age and life's experiences.

Life experiences that you get in the sleepy suburb of mequon? Come on doc you don't know me, nor my life experiences. And since you aren't willing to take the opportunity to teach me I'm assuming that you did mean it to be condescending.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: 4everwarriors on October 18, 2019, 04:05:00 PM
Anytime you want to compare real life experiences, and who, therefore, has a better grasp of reality, I'm game.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 04:15:56 PM
Anytime you want to compare real life experiences, and who, therefore, has a better grasp of reality, I'm game.

Happy to reach out.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 18, 2019, 05:36:03 PM
I’d be curious how people would feel had it been Markus who transferred out and the belief was it was the Hausers that made him leave.  My hunch is, some opinions would be different
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 18, 2019, 05:44:22 PM
I’d be curious how people would feel had it been Markus who transferred out and the belief was it was the Hausers that made him leave.  My hunch is, some opinions would be different

Some people will claim it wasn’t about the Hausers’ own shots, it was about the style of play not leading to winning (despite being something like 20-4 when they wrote the letter complaining about it).

They didn’t want to play with Markus. They didn’t want to play with Herro. What’s the common denominator? They don’t want to play with players who are better than them (a lottery pick and an All American).

Maybe they really did just want to see Theo John be thrown the ball in the low post.

Or maybe they wanted to showcase their own talents.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 05:59:02 PM
was it a "political" statement or just a response to changing societal attitudes and requests from the Native American community (especially those the Jesuits worked with in South Dakota that made the request)? I feel like some of those hanging on to the nickname issue, 26 years later, just use it as a convenient excuse not to support MU, especially financially. They weren't going to give or come to games in the first place, now they have their excuse. It's kind of like people who boycott certain businesses because of a political decision.  For example, the right-wing crowd that vowed to boycott Nordstrom for no longer carrying Ivanka Trump merchandise or left-wingers who boycott restaurants like Chik-Fil-A or Jimmy John's for their stances or actions. You weren't going to shop/eat there anyway.

You "feel" a lot of things in this paragraph, Billy. And you make several assumptions based on these "feelings" But you offer zero evidence to back up any of your "feelings". #Worthless

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 18, 2019, 06:01:25 PM
Some people will claim it wasn’t about the Hausers’ own shots, it was about the style of play not leading to winning (despite being something like 20-4 when they wrote the letter complaining about it).

They didn’t want to play with Markus. They didn’t want to play with Herro. What’s the common denominator? They don’t want to play with players who are better than them (a lottery pick and an All American).

Maybe they really did just want to see Theo John be thrown the ball in the low post.

Or maybe they wanted to showcase their own talents.

I thought of this today.  I think the vitriol towards Markus is shameful.  The Wojo dislike is fine.  That’s the nature of fandom.  The coach always gets more blame than credit. 

I still think back to an exchange I had with a Marquette alum after Crean left.  I asked who he thought would be the next coach and he was absolutely convinced it could be John Calipari.  That sticks with me to this day.  Expectations versus reality are not the same thing.

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 18, 2019, 06:03:58 PM
I thought of this today.  I think the vitriol towards Markus is shameful.  The Wojo dislike is fine.  That’s the nature of fandom.  The coach always gets more blame than credit. 

I still think back to an exchange I had with a Marquette alum after Crean left.  I asked who he thought would be the next coach and he was absolutely convinced it could be John Calipari.  That sticks with me to this day.  Expectations versus reality are not the same thing.

Yup. Markus chose to stay and try to get some wins when it matters. The Hausers decided, for whatever reason it may be, that neither Herro nor Markus were the guys they wanted to play with and they went to two programs that have had a history of success in the Tournament. The Hausers mean as much to me now as Cassius Winston or Kihei Clarke. Wish them neither good nor bad luck. Don’t care if they go 0-33 or 40-0. Go Marquette. Which means go Markus. Our 2nd Team All American, Big East Player of the Year, Preseason First Team All American, and, from everything I’ve seen, heard, and personally experienced, good human being.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Billy Hoyle on October 18, 2019, 06:05:47 PM
You "feel" a lot of things in this paragraph, Billy. And you make several assumptions based on these "feelings" But you offer zero evidence to back up any of your "feelings". #Worthless

if someone doesn't give or support the university and our teams because of a mascot change 26 years ago they weren't going to support it anyway. It's a mascot. It's not like Michigan State harboring and covering up for a rapist doctor or Penn State covering up for a pedophile coach.

Oh, it was only one "assumption" (and anyone who ever made fundraising calls saw those who gave very little to zero used the nickname as their justification for not giving).

#livinginthepast #getoverit
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 06:12:59 PM


They didn’t want to play with Markus. They didn’t want to play with Herro. They don’t want to play with players who are better than them (a lottery pick and an All American).


They didn't want to play with anybody better than them so they transferred to Michigan St and Virginia? LOL
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 18, 2019, 06:14:04 PM
They didn't want to play with anybody better than them so they transferred to Michigan St and Virginia? LOL

Sure seems like it. Who’s going to be better than them on those rosters in a year? I’ll hang up and listen. Please educate me.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 18, 2019, 06:15:01 PM
if someone doesn't give or support the university and our teams because of a mascot change 26 years ago they weren't going to support it anyway. It's a mascot. It's not like Michigan State harboring and covering up for a rapist doctor or Penn State covering up for a pedophile coach.

Oh, it was only one "assumption" (and anyone who ever made fundraising calls saw those who gave very little to zero used the nickname as their justification for not giving).

#livinginthepast #getoverit

I (sadly) know a wealthy, higher profile, MU donor family that discontinued its relationship with MU many years ago because MU hosted a high profile politician from an opposing political party. Some of the family continued to support MU and some did not. You’d be surprised at some of the stories out there.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 18, 2019, 06:43:17 PM
Go Marquette
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 07:03:39 PM
Sure seems like it. Who’s going to be better than them on those rosters in a year? I’ll hang up and listen. Please educate me.

We don't know who's going to be on those rosters next year so I won't go on that fool's errand. But I'm willing to wager that MSU and UVA will be will be better than MU was last year. If Sam and Joey are the "stars" of those teams it will speak volumes about the three coaches.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 18, 2019, 07:05:17 PM
We don't know who's going to be on those rosters next year so I won't go on that fool's errand. But I'm willing to wager that MSU and UVA will be will be better than MU was last year. If Sam and Joey are the "stars" of those teams it will speak volumes about the three coaches.

Got it.

I suppose the Hausers won't improve being a 5th year senior vs. 3rd year junior and a 3rd year sophomore vs. 1st year freshman.  Of course not.

But I'm shocked that Tony Bennett and Tom Izzo are better coaches than Steve Wojciechowski.  Shocked.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 07:17:00 PM


Oh, it was only one "assumption" (and anyone who ever made fundraising calls saw those who gave very little to zero used the nickname as their justification for not giving).

#livinginthepast #getoverit

One assumption? You assumed things about 1) MU alums who didn't like the name change, 2) right wingers who boycott Nordstroms, 3) left wingers who boycott Chik-fil-et, and 4) left wingers who boycott Jimmy Johns.

Short on facts and long on assumptions is no way to go through life, Billy Boy.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: mu_hilltopper on October 18, 2019, 07:24:45 PM
Go Marquette


Damnit, do you have to ruin everything?!?!?
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on October 18, 2019, 07:31:39 PM
That Buffalo game was one of the best home games in years. SHU will be a knife fight this year. The Badger game always has been an incredible vibe...especially the post-game chant down the escalator last year. The sweater vests are much more into the games and the students are closer. I firmly believe this will be a very good team. The ending was not a happy one for sure. If you are suffering MUBB Malaise along the way, get an ED pill.

Btw, malaise is far superior to DePaul apathy.  Count our blessings. More people participate on Scoop in a day than attend a DePaul home game. That will give you a slap in the face. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Silent Verbal on October 18, 2019, 07:50:50 PM
At what point will Wojo be held to the same standard as Crean and Buzz?  Wojo’s first five years pale in comparison to what those two accomplished, and Crean had the far tougher rebuilding job.  We were a borderline mid-major when he took over for Deane.  One idea being floated around is that Wojo is Crean without the Final Four.  Is that supposed to be a compliment?  That’s like saying an actor is F. Murray Abraham without Amadeus.

Milwaukee is a soft sports market, and Marquette mostly flies under the radar unless they’re exceptionally good.  So, zero pressure from the media, zero from the MU administration.  Wojo has been treated with kid gloves by all but a few posters on here, and even that’s not good enough for some of his biggest fans.  Hell, earlier today we had a poster make a personal attack about another poster’s dietary and life choices because he wasn’t showing “unconditional” support for our coach.  Seriously?  If you want to carry the torch for a guy who’s making over a million bucks a year, has won zero NCAA Tournament games, and looks like he’s gonna miss out on yet another big time recruit he’s been very publicly courting for months, that’s your business.  But making personal attacks on people for not sharing your opinions is a bunch of crap, IMO.

Let’s see if Wojo can get it done this year. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 18, 2019, 08:01:48 PM
At what point will Wojo be held to the same standard as Crean and Buzz?  Wojo’s first five years pale in comparison to what those two accomplished, and Crean had the far tougher rebuilding job.  We were a borderline mid-major when he took over for Deane.  One idea being floated around is that Wojo is Crean without the Final Four.  Is that supposed to be a compliment?  That’s like saying an actor is F. Murray Abraham without Amadeus.

Milwaukee is a soft sports market, and Marquette mostly flies under the radar unless they’re exceptionally good.  So, zero pressure from the media, zero from the MU administration.  Wojo has been treated with kid gloves by all but a few posters on here, and even that’s not good enough for some of his biggest fans.  Hell, earlier today we had a poster make a personal attack about another poster’s dietary and life choices because he wasn’t showing “unconditional” support for our coach.  Seriously?  If you want to carry the torch for a guy who’s making over a million bucks a year, has won zero NCAA Tournament games, and looks like he’s gonna miss out on yet another big time recruit he’s been very publicly courting for months, that’s your business.  But making personal attacks on people for not sharing your opinions is a bunch of crap, IMO.

Let’s see if Wojo can get it done this year.

Here's the differences as I see them.

Wojo took over for a guy that crashed his last year and told anyone that would listen the conference was no good, and I'm ditching this place for Va Tech...for less money.  That doesn't look so hot.  Wojo had to follow that toxic departure.

Crean struck gold with Wade, no two ways about it.  Buzz struck gold by inheriting a massive amount of built-in talent.   Wojo did not get the latter benefit, and has yet to strike a Wade like talent...very few coaches do.

The results haven't been the same, the conditions haven't been either.  Disagree there is zero pressure, that's a gross overstatement.  End of the day, he put the team in the post season three straight years, hasn't had off-court issues, the arena was selling out, we were considered a top team much of the year, we have a great All-American who embodies much of the MU character the school strives to project.  That's going to translate into a lot of decent to good feelings.

I am curious to see how this year goes.  I am optimistic.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Shooter McGavin on October 18, 2019, 08:08:33 PM
I very much looked forward to games against Louisville, even though they owned us.  When Huggins was @Cincy, those were acrimonious games too.  Notre Dame. 
 If 50 years is your time horizon, DePaul.     


Unfortunately the ND rivalry is over.  No one is aware that it existed unless you are in your late 40s.  Cincinnati and Louisville rivalries were flashes in the pan but rivalries nonetheless due to conference affiliation.  I think the home and away format of the new conference will lead to outstanding rivalries as the years go on.  I can’t wait for the SH games this year.  I hope we pound those guys into the ground.   I’m starting to hate Georgetown as well with that pouty looking white shooting guard.  I really want to contribute to St. John’s never being good again.  Butler and their fans are really starting to annoy the F out of me (I live in Indiana) and DePaul would be an instant rivalry if they got their act together.

I think this conference is really good.  People pining for the days of conference USA with Louisville and Cincinnati as rivals are not appreciating what is taking place in front o their face.  UConn did not rejoin our conference because it sucks.  It is damn good and you people need to get fired up for this season.  We have a freaking All-American on our team and some tough kids to go along with him.   Let’s get behind this team and have fun.  Screw the malaise!   Fire up Marquette!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole on October 18, 2019, 08:18:23 PM
The DePaul rivaly continues, but has really lost its luster.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 08:20:35 PM
At what point will Wojo be held to the same standard as Crean and Buzz?  Wojo’s first five years pale in comparison to what those two accomplished, and Crean had the far tougher rebuilding job.  We were a borderline mid-major when he took over for Deane.  One idea being floated around is that Wojo is Crean without the Final Four.  Is that supposed to be a compliment?  That’s like saying an actor is F. Murray Abraham without Amadeus.

Milwaukee is a soft sports market, and Marquette mostly flies under the radar unless they’re exceptionally good.  So, zero pressure from the media, zero from the MU administration.  Wojo has been treated with kid gloves by all but a few posters on here, and even that’s not good enough for some of his biggest fans.  Hell, earlier today we had a poster make a personal attack about another poster’s dietary and life choices because he wasn’t showing “unconditional” support for our coach.  Seriously?  If you want to carry the torch for a guy who’s making over a million bucks a year, has won zero NCAA Tournament games, and looks like he’s gonna miss out on yet another big time recruit he’s been very publicly courting for months, that’s your business.  But making personal attacks on people for not sharing your opinions is a bunch of crap, IMO.

Let’s see if Wojo can get it done this year.

it was in poor taste. Ive been frustrated by some posts of his on the recruiting thread mixed with a bad cold meant poor post decisions. My bad everyone
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 08:20:43 PM
Got it.

I suppose the Hausers won't improve being a 5th year senior vs. 3rd year junior and a 3rd year sophomore vs. 1st year freshman.  Of course not.

But I'm shocked that Tony Bennett and Tom Izzo are better coaches than Steve Wojciechowski.  Shocked.

So you think third year sophomore version of Joey and 5th year senior version of Sam would have been our stars last year? Or that Markus's usage would have gone down much under those circumstances? I don't. Nobody's gonna get the ball out of MH's hands - and that's the way Wojo wants it. Most here agree with Wojo. I'd prefer a little more distribution.

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 18, 2019, 08:25:12 PM
So you think third year sophomore version of Joey and 5th year senior version of Sam would have been our stars last year? Or that Markus's usage would have gone down much under those circumstances? I don't. Nobody's gonna get the ball out of MH's hands - and that's the way Wojo wants it. Most here agree with Wojo. I'd prefer a little more distribution.

I wish time traveling was available. Apparently the Hausers were open to remaining at Marquette so long as Markus (or Tyler) was not here. Unfortunately a 5th year Sam and 3rd year Joey in 2018-2019 were just not possible.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 18, 2019, 08:27:52 PM
So you think third year sophomore version of Joey and 5th year senior version of Sam would have been our stars last year? Or that Markus's usage would have gone down much under those circumstances? I don't. Nobody's gonna get the ball out of MH's hands - and that's the way Wojo wants it. Most here agree with Wojo. I'd prefer a little more distribution.

not so much for sam I think he is what he is but id expect soph joey would have a bit better ball control to get his own shot
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Newsdreams on October 18, 2019, 08:31:55 PM
"Unconditional support," hell no. I'm not a sheep or a follower in anything. I can and do think for myself. With regards to Wojo, it's obvious. He's out of his league.
BTW, and I seriously do not mean this in a condescending way, but your youth and naïveté is showing.
You seem too constipated get away from those conspiracy BS diets. Eat balance diet, constipation makes you grouchy. Those diets are akin to following infowars. By the way my Championship player connection say all old players love Wojo. But that is them, no matta!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: UNC Eagle on October 18, 2019, 08:38:01 PM
My sole connection to Marquette basketball is that I have enjoyed the style of play over many years. They are the team I enjoy the most in college basketball so I am a fan by choice.  I am actually looking forward to the season this year, as I believe the team will be more in line with the gritty style of play that originally drew me into following Marquette basketball.

Also my perspective on Coach Wojo has evolved somewhat over the years.  I was not a fan of his as a player at Duke, and that carried over to his coaching days there. D-Bag pretty much summed up my view to him.  However, since he came to Marquette  I see him as trying to put his own imprint on the program  and he seems to be going about things in a systematic way. Less of a D-bag and more of a guy working hard the best way he knows how to. There has been some success. Albeit, not at a rate that those invested more heavily in Marquette would like to see. I am sympathetic to those with that viewpoint. Especially given how much the school spends on the program.  I will point out that the coach seems to be steadily getting quality players to commit to the program each year. Also he seems to be consistently recruiting big men, which is something prior coaches had some challenges with ,and generally speaking ,is not an easy thing to do. Finally, the coach seems to understand the ability to sell playing time to stars /potential stars. He did get Henry Ellenson and Markus to join the program and was in the final discussion with guys like Manion, Grimes and now Davis / Garcia. Don't forget that Torrence was a player who switched grad years. If he stayed in 2020 he may have been  in range of being a Burger Boy based on his strong play in EYBL prior to matriculating.

I also like the Big East conference. The games are competitive and the brand of basketball is consistently enjoyable to watch.  Picking up U Conn moves the conference further down the quality path. I believe that new  addition will raise the level of every team in the league. The conference games are always competitive and the non conference schedule has quality opponents. The players in the league are generally older and thus the teams have a good chance at making tournament. So conference is on the uptrend as well.

So, while not seeing things through rose colored glasses by any means, I would say my bigger picture outlook is positive for Marquette basketball. Somebody posted a  historical Ken Pom ranking of programs  a while back and I think MU was somewhere around 32 33  .  So generally program is in a good place and can be built up.

Looking forward to the next few weeks and start of the season.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 08:59:49 PM
 
I still think back to an exchange I had with a Marquette alum after Crean left.  I asked who he thought would be the next coach and he was absolutely convinced it could be John Calipari.  That sticks with me to this day.  Expectations versus reality are not the same thing.

So you ran into the dumbest guy ever to go to Marquette. Unlucky for you.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: MU82 on October 18, 2019, 10:07:19 PM
I have absolutely no malaise toward Marquette basketball. I am excited for this season, just as I was enjoying last season while it was taking place, and I was looking forward to the 2018-19 season at this point last year, and each season before those.

I care. I want us to win, and win big. When I go to games, I stand and cheer a lot. When I'm watching at home, my dog has to leave the room because I'm too into the games. If I lived within 60 miles of Marquette, I'd have season tickets for sure. I loved going to DC for the 2013 Elite Eight. I loved being at the 2003 Final Four.

But I also find reasons to get something out of the MU teams that don't achieve to that degree, and I certainly don't let the bad seasons ruin my life. I'm stoked for the game, but if we lose, I move on. It's an outlet, it's not real life.

There are folks dealing with cancer and extreme financial distress and opioid addiction and overcooked Arby's, for cripe's sake. I try to keep things in perspective; I don't always succeed, I get frustrated at times just like everybody does, but I try. I know there are some who believe that keeping things in perspective and not losing one's shyte means one is a "lesser fan." I disagree, but whatevs.

I wish all of my fellow Warriors (and Golden Eagles) good fortune, and a great (and malaise-free) season ahead.

We are Marquette!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Hards Alumni on October 18, 2019, 10:26:47 PM
I decided to start a new thread where we can hash this out rather than continuing to pollute the recruiting thread with another tangent.

Why do some posters seem to revel more in Wojo's recruiting misses than his successes?

Why do so few care about Markus being a preseason first team AA?

Why do some hope Wojo does just well enough to be hired away?

Why do some continue to defend those who left while being derogatory to those who stayed? 

We are just a few weeks from the start of the season and we are busier parsing LeBron's thoughts on China than we are discussing potential rotations, who starts at the 4, who starts at the 5, zone options.  Why?

This is a fringe   top 25 preseason team with a high ceiling.  All some posters care about is a game against an unknown opponent 6 months away?

Is it Wojo? 
Are we tired of each other and scoop?   
Have all the basketball discussions been done before?   
Is it reflective of society around us?   
Even though we officially don't talk politics, is it bleeding through in our opinions about sports, each other, scoop?

Is it the years, the Crean vs. Buzz vs. Wojo debates having a cumulative effect?

Is it a couple of posters?

To me, this is becoming a joyless place.   Will winning change that?  24 wins didn't.  It made it worse.

A frustrating malaise.   

What is your complaint about MU hoops? 
 What is your solution? 
 Do you honestly believe there is a coach out there that is markedly better who would come to MU?   Name names.

But keep it here.   Let the recruiting thread be about recruiting.

I need to know where I fit in.  In fact, I crave this attention.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 18, 2019, 11:19:35 PM
I have absolutely no malaise toward Marquette basketball. I am excited for this season, just as I was enjoying last season while it was taking place, and I was looking forward to the 2018-19 season at this point last year, and each season before those.

I care. I want us to win, and win big. When I go to games, I stand and cheer a lot. When I'm watching at home, my dog has to leave the room because I'm too into the games. If I lived within 60 miles of Marquette, I'd have season tickets for sure. I loved going to DC for the 2013 Elite Eight. I loved being at the 2003 Final Four.

But I also find reasons to get something out of the MU teams that don't achieve to that degree, and I certainly don't let the bad seasons ruin my life. I'm stoked for the game, but if we lose, I move on. It's an outlet, it's not real life.

There are folks dealing with cancer and extreme financial distress and opioid addiction and overcooked Arby's, for cripe's sake. I try to keep things in perspective; I don't always succeed, I get frustrated at times just like everybody does, but I try. I know there are some who believe that keeping things in perspective and not losing one's shyte means one is a "lesser fan." I disagree, but whatevs.

I wish all of my fellow Warriors (and Golden Eagles) good fortune, and a great (and malaise-free) season ahead.

We are Marquette!

I'm with you Mike. While Marquette basketball is one of my (and all Scoopers, I presume) big passions, our success (or lack thereof) won't cure cancer or solve the problem of world hunger. A tough loss, a bad season or a protracted "malaise" doesn't mean much compared to the health and happiness of those we love. We ALL get that. But this is a Marquette basketball website. People come here to celebrate, to commiserate and to bitch. It what fans do. You're an insightful and often extremely critical guy (on countless subjects), but when it comes to MU bball you generally check those qualities at the door in favor of a more enthusiastic approach. Doesn't make you a lesser (or better) fan. Just different. Everyone here decides how much objectivity to bring to their love and loyalty for MU. That's fine. But arguing over how much is appropriate isn't fine. It leads to arguments, baseless accusations (anyone here who knows 4ever and Goose knows they want nothing but success for MU) and enmity. We don't need to always agree on the state of our basketball program here, but it sure would be nice if we could acknowledge that disagreement doesn't equal disloyalty. Might even eliminate some of the "malaise".

We are Marquette - indeed.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: 🏀 on October 18, 2019, 11:54:37 PM
I picked a bad day to stay off the internet apparently.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: NorthernDancerColt on October 19, 2019, 12:14:04 AM
Here's the differences as I see them.

Wojo took over for a guy that crashed his last year and told anyone that would listen the conference was no good, and I'm ditching this place for Va Tech...for less money.  That doesn't look so hot.  Wojo had to follow that toxic departure.

Crean struck gold with Wade, no two ways about it.  Buzz struck gold by inheriting a massive amount of built-in talent.   Wojo did not get the latter benefit, and has yet to strike a Wade like talent...very few coaches do.

The results haven't been the same, the conditions haven't been either.  Disagree there is zero pressure, that's a gross overstatement.  End of the day, he put the team in the post season three straight years, hasn't had off-court issues, the arena was selling out, we were considered a top team much of the year, we have a great All-American who embodies much of the MU character the school strives to project.  That's going to translate into a lot of decent to good feelings.

I am curious to see how this year goes.  I am optimistic.

For all the Scoop dumpster-fires you’ve been accused of starting,
this is a home-run post!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 06:39:21 AM
So you ran into the dumbest guy ever to go to Marquette. Unlucky for you.

It’s isn’t isolated.  When Wojo gets fired or leaves on his own accord, the names that will be tossed around by alum and fans won’t match reality. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: dgies9156 on October 19, 2019, 06:43:08 AM
I think it's understandable. We've been in a slow rebuild and patience wears thin. Then we start winning and winning a lot. On February 26th we were on the verge of being a top 10 team, winning the Big East, and earning a top 3 seed in the NCAA tournament (meaning a very good chance at Wojo's first tourney victory). People started to hope after years of nothing special. Then the wheels came off. Smashed any and all hope in spectacular fashion, culminating in the embarrassment against Murray State.

But the hope smashing wasn't over. We could at least take comfort in most of the roster coming back and every national pundit pegging us as a preseason top 10 team.....until Hausergate. More hope destroyed. Yeah we are still a preseason top 25 team, but that rings a little hollow after starting the offseason as a preseason top 10 team. It's still good...but you can't help and think about what you were before.

Long story short, it will take a lot of winning and finishing a season strong before people start to hope again.

Brother TAMU is wise beyond his years.

The malaise comes from most of us wanting a breakthrough season. Of wanting to be in the talk for a Natty and getting to the point where it's more than talk.

Going into last year, we had the trajectory. We had the focus and we had the team that appeared capable of getting us where most of us oldies wanted to be. Then came the Murray State debacle (my stomach still churns at that one -- it is one of the few times I became so disgusted I turned my TV off in the middle of an MU game). Then Hausershima.

Before Hausershima, we were talked about with the best in college basketball. We had a taste of what could be. Overrated at Number 4? Most certainly! But among the best, well, we had been waiting for that for several years and we finally got there.

I suspect most of us, Scoopers and Laymen,  are playing a waiting game. Do we get excited over a team that limps into fourth place in our conference and is a late add for the NCAA tournament? Well, maybe because We Are Marquette! But do we invest emotion into it? Maybe not. Are we ready for yet another rebuild and a promise of tomorrow that may never come -- HELL NO!

Make Marquette Feared Again!!!!!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on October 19, 2019, 06:46:30 AM
It’s isn’t isolated.  When Wojo gets fired or leaves on his own accord, the names that will be tossed around by alum and fans won’t match reality.

There is some joker that says crazy stuff in any fan base.  Sometimes they have power and influence even.  You are right that it isn’t isolated—to marquette. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 07:21:01 AM
There is some joker that says crazy stuff in any fan base.  Sometimes they have power and influence even.  You are right that it isn’t isolated—to marquette.

That is quite true. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 07:26:59 AM
Here’s a question I have for the folks here, would you take Frank Martin’s run at South Carolina, one final four since 2012 and only one tourney appearance?

I ask this because a great tournament run bought him time and now three years later, they look like a team headed for another NIT or bust season.  If Wojo has a great tournament run this year, that doesn’t portend future success per se
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 19, 2019, 07:56:15 AM
Here’s a question I have for the folks here, would you take Frank Martin’s run at South Carolina, one final four since 2012 and only one tourney appearance?

I ask this because a great tournament run bought him time and now three years later, they look like a team headed for another NIT or bust season.  If Wojo has a great tournament run this year, that doesn’t portend future success per se

Apples to oranges.

1) Length of times are different
2) South Carolina had NEVER made it beyond the Sweet 16 in the history of their program. In fact they have NEVER even made the NCAA tourney 10 times in the history of their program. Spoiler alert: Most of their success was in the early 1970's. MU has made it 33 times in case anyone was wondering.
3) Hoops budgets and resources are a bit different.
4) And so on...

It isn't rocket science. It isn't personal. It's a business. For fans, it's entertainment. 2 NCAA appearances in 5 seasons losing first round twice by a total of 39 points. Many people reasonably expect more than that. For me personally winning the league is a goal and it was disappointing to be in great position and fade because it is tough to win it.

This is about.....can Wojo go from 2 of 5 make NCAA's to 5 of 5? Can he go from no NCAA wins to many in the next 5 seasons if he is at MU. .....the other goals are big games, rivals be competitive and not lose often, be competitive to win league and league tourney. .....A top 16 program would be a hypothetical Sweet 16 caliber program. I would like to see a top 25 program established year in and year out with a goal of that top 16. It is reasonable and fair. I do not expect deep runs often or all the time. Once in a while, sure, I do not expect league titles annually. I do not expect anything less than the above. If Wojo can do it, great, if not, find someone that can. It's a big money business, these people make good money and understand the expectations. It's pretty simple and straight forward for me.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 19, 2019, 08:19:16 AM
MU has made it 33 times in case anyone was wondering.

We've made it 34 times just accepted 33
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 08:24:22 AM
Apples to oranges.

1) Length of times are different
2) South Carolina had NEVER made it beyond the Sweet 16 in the history of their program. In fact they have NEVER even made the NCAA tourney 10 times in the history of their program. Spoiler alert: Most of their success was in the early 1970's. MU has made it 33 times in case anyone was wondering.
3) Hoops budgets and resources are a bit different.
4) And so on...

It isn't rocket science. It isn't personal. It's a business. For fans, it's entertainment. 2 NCAA appearances in 5 seasons losing first round twice by a total of 39 points. Many people reasonably expect more than that. For me personally winning the league is a goal and it was disappointing to be in great position and fade because it is tough to win it.

This is about.....can Wojo go from 2 of 5 make NCAA's to 5 of 5? Can he go from no NCAA wins to many in the next 5 seasons if he is at MU. .....the other goals are big games, rivals be competitive and not lose often, be competitive to win league and league tourney. .....A top 16 program would be a hypothetical Sweet 16 caliber program. I would like to see a top 25 program established year in and year out with a goal of that top 16. It is reasonable and fair. I do not expect deep runs often or all the time. Once in a while, sure, I do not expect league titles annually. I do not expect anything less than the above. If Wojo can do it, great, if not, find someone that can. It's a big money business, these people make good money and understand the expectations. It's pretty simple and straight forward for me.

Those are fair expectations.  Marquette has made the Sweet 16 5 times since 1977, twice when their seeding suggested they were underdogs (1994 as a 6-seed and as an 11-seed in 2011).

Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole on October 19, 2019, 08:29:56 AM
People need to stop bringing up the basketball budget when they talk about Marquette.  It's inflated for many reasons and the figure relative to other schools are not apples to apples.

Yes, Marquette devotes a great deal to basketball.  But it isn't an extraordinary amount compared to most Power 6 schools.  So the low ROI implications that many are making aren't really accurate.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on October 19, 2019, 08:51:49 AM
I'm very excited about Marquette basketball. 

It is Scoop for which I have malaise.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 19, 2019, 08:57:53 AM
It’s isn’t isolated.  When Wojo gets fired or leaves on his own accord, the names that will be tossed around by alum and fans won’t match reality.

We already had one person with a list that started and ended with Tony Bennett, Kelvin Sampson, and Chris Beard, and at least one meat eating summit man agreed with the poster.

We’d end up with someone that has, at best, a similar resume to Brian Wardle, who the meat eating summit men laugh at the thought of.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: tower912 on October 19, 2019, 09:06:16 AM
Wardle or another assistant.   Maybe that assistant is Stan.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: DegenerateDish on October 19, 2019, 10:14:39 AM
Topper said it best...win a couple tournament games, that’ll cure a lot of ills.

The game at Creighton last year, the Buffalo/Wisconsin games last year, those fun and great moments seemed all for nothing as the season went up in flames. The buy in to this upcoming season is tough based on how last year ended.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole on October 19, 2019, 10:19:45 AM
Topper said it best...win a couple tournament games, that’ll cure a lot of ills.

The game at Creighton last year, the Buffalo/Wisconsin games last year, those fun and great moments seemed all for nothing as the season went up in flames. The buy in to this upcoming season is tough based on how last year ended.

Yeah, I don't fall in the same boat as you do here.  I don't forget the bright spots of a season just because it ended poorly.  That would be too frustrating for me as a fan. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 19, 2019, 10:27:07 AM
Topper said it best...win a couple tournament games, that’ll cure a lot of ills.

The game at Creighton last year, the Buffalo/Wisconsin games last year, those fun and great moments seemed all for nothing as the season went up in flames. The buy in to this upcoming season is tough based on how last year ended.

Finishing 2nd in the league, the specific mentioned wins, etc...not a season up in flames.

What they need is to play better late in the season/post-season. We can talk about matchups and injuries, etc but part of the deal is winning late no matter those things. Gotta be able to mix it in sometimes over time. Conf tourney was a little better and close missed opportunity there. Need to continue to be more competitive in that and in NCAA’s. The season has a lot of components. Not playing well late has been an issue. And it will be an issue until it improves. There were a lot of good things too and they still count. We’ll see if MU can turn the corner a bit this season.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: jesmu84 on October 19, 2019, 10:29:58 AM
Apples to oranges.

1) Length of times are different
2) South Carolina had NEVER made it beyond the Sweet 16 in the history of their program. In fact they have NEVER even made the NCAA tourney 10 times in the history of their program. Spoiler alert: Most of their success was in the early 1970's. MU has made it 33 times in case anyone was wondering.
3) Hoops budgets and resources are a bit different.
4) And so on...

It isn't rocket science. It isn't personal. It's a business. For fans, it's entertainment. 2 NCAA appearances in 5 seasons losing first round twice by a total of 39 points. Many people reasonably expect more than that. For me personally winning the league is a goal and it was disappointing to be in great position and fade because it is tough to win it.

This is about.....can Wojo go from 2 of 5 make NCAA's to 5 of 5? Can he go from no NCAA wins to many in the next 5 seasons if he is at MU. .....the other goals are big games, rivals be competitive and not lose often, be competitive to win league and league tourney. .....A top 16 program would be a hypothetical Sweet 16 caliber program. I would like to see a top 25 program established year in and year out with a goal of that top 16. It is reasonable and fair. I do not expect deep runs often or all the time. Once in a while, sure, I do not expect league titles annually. I do not expect anything less than the above. If Wojo can do it, great, if not, find someone that can. It's a big money business, these people make good money and understand the expectations. It's pretty simple and straight forward for me.

Who do you believe would be realistic candidates for the job if wojo were to leave/get fired?
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: DegenerateDish on October 19, 2019, 10:30:21 AM
Yeah, I don't fall in the same boat as you do here.  I don't forget the bright spots of a season just because it ended poorly.  That would be too frustrating for me as a fan.

For me, those moments were great in the moment, but were the slow burn towards March. Win a couple games in March last year, and those moments stand out much more, and highlight a hell of a season.

I respect the difference of opinion though, I think ultimately we just want as much success for MU as possible.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 10:34:55 AM
Apples to oranges.

1) Length of times are different
2) South Carolina had NEVER made it beyond the Sweet 16 in the history of their program. In fact they have NEVER even made the NCAA tourney 10 times in the history of their program. Spoiler alert: Most of their success was in the early 1970's. MU has made it 33 times in case anyone was wondering.


This is about.....can Wojo go from 2 of 5 make NCAA's to 5 of 5? Can he go from no NCAA wins to many in the next 5 seasons if he is at MU. .....the other goals are big games, rivals be competitive and not lose often, be competitive to win league and league tourney. .....A top 16 program would be a hypothetical Sweet 16 caliber program. I would like to see a top 25 program established year in and year out with a goal of that top 16. It is reasonable and fair. I do not expect deep runs often or all the time. Once in a while, sure, I do not expect league titles annually. I do not expect anything less than the above. If Wojo can do it, great, if not, find someone that can. It's a big money business, these people make good money and understand the expectations. It's pretty simple and straight forward for me.

Army has also won a bunch of football games, so has Fordham.

2 of 5 is accurate....also accurate to say 2 of 3.  If we lost both games by one point we would be 0-2 in the NCAAs...also accurate.


The budget thing, Sultan said it well, but I would add that we spend what we do to OVERCOME some of the inherent disadvantages we have as a non football, small, private, northern school.  Just to be where we are, we have to spend what we do.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 19, 2019, 10:35:08 AM
was it a "political" statement or just a response to changing societal attitudes and requests from the Native American community (especially those the Jesuits worked with in South Dakota that made the request)? I feel like some of those hanging on to the nickname issue, 26 years later, just use it as a convenient excuse not to support MU, especially financially. They weren't going to give or come to games in the first place, now they have their excuse. It's kind of like people who boycott certain businesses because of a political decision.  For example, the right-wing crowd that vowed to boycott Nordstrom for no longer carrying Ivanka Trump merchandise or left-wingers who boycott restaurants like Chik-Fil-A or Jimmy John's for their stances or actions. You weren't going to shop/eat there anyway.

If it was a response to changing attitudes then why did the University not allow Warriors to be a choice when they asked students and alumni to vote for a nick name? You may not agree, but to me that was a political decision because they new how that vote would have gone. If the vote were to happen today things might be different, but we both know that is not going to happen.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Litehouse on October 19, 2019, 10:44:49 AM
I’d be curious how people would feel had it been Markus who transferred out and the belief was it was the Hausers that made him leave.  My hunch is, some opinions would be different



I'd feel about the same.  In an age of one-and-done, transfers, and short lived college careers, we had 3 years of watching Sam and Markus develop together.  It's not often you get to watch 2 players that good play together that long in college.  Everything was building to a fantastic senior year and then it fell apart. I'm still looking forward to the season, but it's still a bit of a let down knowing we could have had something really special. 
I understand why it didn't work out, it's just a shame it didn't.  I suppose it's a little like Lennon and McCartney.  They're both fine on their own, but I'd be more excited about the Beatles.  I guess that makes Joey Yoko Ono.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 19, 2019, 10:49:42 AM
Topper said it best...win a couple tournament games, that’ll cure a lot of ills.

The game at Creighton last year, the Buffalo/Wisconsin games last year, those fun and great moments seemed all for nothing as the season went up in flames. The buy in to this upcoming season is tough based on how last year ended.

This is where I stand. I was basically "all in" on Wojo through mid February. I thought he and the program had turned a corner. Then came a total collapse on the court followed by one off the court. Some say the season ended "poorly". I think that's an understatement of epic proportion.

So I'm in the "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" camp. After falling for the fool's gold last year I'll be more wary this year. I think Wojo has earned that.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 19, 2019, 10:55:48 AM
If it was a response to changing attitudes then why did the University not allow Warriors to be a choice when they asked students and alumni to vote for a nick name? You may not agree, but to me that was a political decision because they new how that vote would have gone. If the vote were to happen today things might be different, but we both know that is not going to happen.

This is the "Jesuit way": 1.They make their decision 2. They run a rigged PR scam that tries to make the alumni feel as if their input is important. 3. They announce their decision.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 19, 2019, 11:14:02 AM
Good post, 69. Maybe drawing too fine of a line, but I think it was political correctness run amok rather than politics.

Warriors, with an Indian mascot, has no place in modern society. We don’t need team names that reflect race. Warriors, in a generic sense though, is 100% appropriate.

I don’t want this thread turn into another battle over the name, though.

Neither do I. That battle is over, but when the University denied students and alumni the choice of warriors when asked to vote on a new nick name, to me that was political and not just PC.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on October 19, 2019, 11:49:50 AM
Here’s a question I have for the folks here, would you take Frank Martin’s run at South Carolina, one final four since 2012 and only one tourney appearance?

I ask this because a great tournament run bought him time and now three years later, they look like a team headed for another NIT or bust season.  If Wojo has a great tournament run this year, that doesn’t portend future success per se

I don't like Frank Martin coached teams.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 12:26:56 PM
This is where I stand. I was basically "all in" on Wojo through mid February. I thought he and the program had turned a corner. Then came a total collapse on the court followed by one off the court. Some say the season ended "poorly". I think that's an understatement of epic proportion.

So I'm in the "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" camp. After falling for the fool's gold last year I'll be more wary this year. I think Wojo has earned that.

You were all in through mid February?   
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Goose on October 19, 2019, 01:01:19 PM
Cheeks

I thought Lenny’s post was quite clear.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: shoothoops on October 19, 2019, 01:33:42 PM
Who do you believe would be realistic candidates for the job if wojo were to leave/get fired?

My short answer is I don't have a I ready list today vs some names in mind. The longer version is to this point I haven't advocated Wojo's dismissal. However I do believe to please the masses he needs to make the NCAA 2nd weekend soon. That is a reasonable, fair, obvious statement. With regard to candidates.....

The challenge for MU will be getting a successful mid major type of head coach that isn't going to prefer a Power 5 school. This past season, Oats goes from Buffalo to Alabama. Musselman goes from Nevada to Arkansas. Brannen went from N Kentucky to Cincinnati. So the last one there is different. There is also the high major assistant route, and the other category such as Penny, Howard, Stackhouse etc...A good coach and fit can come from a variety of places. I am open to that.

I would have preferences, and a list if and when the time comes, yes. And we could then discuss it.

The expectation this year is making the NCAA's and having success in it. I don't see why MU couldn't do that.

It's fair to say the next 5 years, if there is 5 for Wojo needs to be a better percentage making NCAA's, a better percentage winning in NCAA's, better league finishes, better conference tourney results. If there isn't much improvement, and/or too many setbacks, I don't believe we will get to that point. I am neither a Wojo hater, nor am I a Wojo apologist.

If someone said he or she has been satisfied or happy with the first 5 year results, I would disagree. It's just basketball, just sports, just entertainment, but if MU is going to have a program, it may as well get the best results possible. I believe it is fair to say MU has underachieved thus far with Wojo. It doesn't mean Wojo can't improve that moving forward. He can't afford anymore down or rebuilding seasons any time soon. Specifically the way MU plays and in game and in season adjustments can be tweaked a bit. I, like many others will look for that this year and moving forward. I hope for a great season.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 01:51:09 PM
Cheeks

I thought Lenny’s post was quite clear.

I’m trying to remember the moments he was all-in....
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 01:55:15 PM
My short answer is I don't have a I ready list today vs some names in mind. The longer version is to this point I haven't advocated Wojo's dismissal. However I do believe to please the masses he needs to make the NCAA 2nd weekend soon. That is a reasonable, fair, obvious statement. With regard to candidates.....

The challenge for MU will be getting a successful mid major type of head coach that isn't going to prefer a Power 5 school. This past season, Oats goes from Buffalo to Alabama. Musselman goes from Nevada to Arkansas. Brannen went from N Kentucky to Cincinnati. So the last one there is different. There is also the high major assistant route, and the other category such as Penny, Howard, Stackhouse etc...A good coach and fit can come from a variety of places. I am open to that.

I would have preferences, and a list if and when the time comes, yes. And we could then discuss it.

The expectation this year is making the NCAA's and having success in it. I don't see why MU couldn't do that.

It's fair to say the next 5 years, if there is 5 for Wojo needs to be a better percentage making NCAA's, a better percentage winning in NCAA's, better league finishes, better conference tourney results. If there isn't much improvement, and/or too many setbacks, I don't believe we will get to that point. I am neither a Wojo hater, nor am I a Wojo apologist.

If someone said he or she has been satisfied or happy with the first 5 year results, I would disagree. It's just basketball, just sports, just entertainment, but if MU is going to have a program, it may as well get the best results possible. I believe it is fair to say MU has underachieved thus far with Wojo. It doesn't mean Wojo can't improve that moving forward. He can't afford anymore down or rebuilding seasons any time soon. Specifically the way MU plays and in game and in season adjustments can be tweaked a bit. I, like many others will look for that this year and moving forward. I hope for a great season.

Let’s see how Penny, Howard, Stackhouse do...actual wins and losses.  Drexler crashed.  Ewing we will see.  Isaiah, Magic, McHale...not good. 
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Silent Verbal on October 19, 2019, 02:24:30 PM
Who do you believe would be realistic candidates for the job if wojo were to leave/get fired?

I’d advocate for TJ Otzelberger or Nate Oates.  I know those guys are in high major jobs now, but they have WI ties and we could maybe offer a pay bump from their current position.  I think there are people on this board who’ve said MU has had their eye on TJO.

I don’t know if you meant it this way, but your question, to me, makes it seem like you don’t think there are any coaches out there who could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo.  If we can’t find someone better, it would be the easiest thing in the world to find someone who’s just as good.  I think pretty much any coach could guide a program to zero NCAA Tournament wins in five seasons.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 19, 2019, 02:52:34 PM
I’d advocate for TJ Otzelberger or Nate Oates.  I know those guys are in high major jobs now, but they have WI ties and we could maybe offer a pay bump from their current position.  I think there are people on this board who’ve said MU has had their eye on TJO.

I don’t know if you meant it this way, but your question, to me, makes it seem like you don’t think there are any coaches out there who could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo.  If we can’t find someone better, it would be the easiest thing in the world to find someone who’s just as good.  I think pretty much any coach could guide a program to zero NCAA Tournament wins in five seasons.

Yeah anyone could bug There's a huge difference between guiding Depaul to zero NCAA tournament wins in five seasons vs what Wojo has done
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 03:29:59 PM
I’d advocate for TJ Otzelberger or Nate Oates.  I know those guys are in high major jobs now, but they have WI ties and we could maybe offer a pay bump from their current position.  I think there are people on this board who’ve said MU has had their eye on TJO.

I don’t know if you meant it this way, but your question, to me, makes it seem like you don’t think there are any coaches out there who could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo.  If we can’t find someone better, it would be the easiest thing in the world to find someone who’s just as good.  I think pretty much any coach could guide a program to zero NCAA Tournament wins in five seasons.

I will be watching TJ closely.  Damn good recruiter, well-respected across the country
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Silent Verbal on October 19, 2019, 03:31:18 PM
Yeah anyone could bug There's a huge difference between guiding Depaul to zero NCAA tournament wins in five seasons vs what Wojo has done

Well, I named two guys I think would be viable candidates, who might accept the job at the right price.  If Thad Matta is able to coach again, he might also be interested and a good choice.  I’m sure other Scoopers can name more guys they’d like to see who aren’t Tony Bennett, Kelvin Sampson, and Chris Beard.  This idea that nobody could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo’s doing is wrongheaded.   
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Silent Verbal on October 19, 2019, 03:33:40 PM
I will be watching TJ closely.  Damn good recruiter, well-respected across the country

He’d be the first guy I’d call if Wojo leaves or is shown the door.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Uncle Rico on October 19, 2019, 03:51:01 PM
He’d be the first guy I’d call if Wojo leaves or is shown the door.

Breathed a sigh of relief when DePaul ignored him for a retread in Leitao
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: MU82 on October 19, 2019, 03:51:07 PM
I'm with you Mike. While Marquette basketball is one of my (and all Scoopers, I presume) big passions, our success (or lack thereof) won't cure cancer or solve the problem of world hunger. A tough loss, a bad season or a protracted "malaise" doesn't mean much compared to the health and happiness of those we love. We ALL get that. But this is a Marquette basketball website. People come here to celebrate, to commiserate and to bitch. It what fans do. You're an insightful and often extremely critical guy (on countless subjects), but when it comes to MU bball you generally check those qualities at the door in favor of a more enthusiastic approach. Doesn't make you a lesser (or better) fan. Just different. Everyone here decides how much objectivity to bring to their love and loyalty for MU. That's fine. But arguing over how much is appropriate isn't fine. It leads to arguments, baseless accusations (anyone here who knows 4ever and Goose knows they want nothing but success for MU) and enmity. We don't need to always agree on the state of our basketball program here, but it sure would be nice if we could acknowledge that disagreement doesn't equal disloyalty. Might even eliminate some of the "malaise".

We are Marquette - indeed.

We are in agreement, Lenny.

Sometimes I get a little snarky, yes, and I do admit it bugs me a little bit when a few posters don't show up after wins or after a recruiting get but can't wait to rip after a loss or a recruiting miss, but  yes, fans are fans.

FWIW -- probably not much -- I have gone from bullish on Wojo to "show me" on Wojo. I was generally pleased with the trajectory of the program and the quality of the recruits he was bringing in, and I still am to a degree. However, while I don't absolve the Hausers for Hausershima, he is the coach and the buck stops there. It was a total shyteshow, and it reflects on the coach. So probably for the first time since he's been our coach, in my eyes, the pressure is on Wojo.

I said "probably not much" because there is no "or else" for me, either real or implied. And frankly, I doubt he would be fired unless we have a total dumpster fire of a season ... and who knows, maybe not even then.

So while I personally want to see him take the next step with our program and overcome the fallout of Hausershima, I am pretty realistic.

Go Marquette!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: MU82 on October 19, 2019, 03:57:24 PM
Well, I named two guys I think would be viable candidates, who might accept the job at the right price.  If Thad Matta is able to coach again, he might also be interested and a good choice.  I’m sure other Scoopers can name more guys they’d like to see who aren’t Tony Bennett, Kelvin Sampson, and Chris Beard.  This idea that nobody could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo’s doing is wrongheaded.

Unless I missed it, and it's certainly possible I did, I don't know as I've seen any Scooper say (or even imply) that nobody could do a better job at MU than Wojo.

What some have said is that if you fire Wojo, you start over, most likely with either a mid-major coach, a P6 assistant or possibly a retread. And if you don't score big with the person who replaces him, you can set the program back a decade.

I'm not arguing that is a reason to avoid firing him if justified. I'm simply saying you'd better know exactly what your intentions are before you go the starting-over route.

There are no sure things. Every single Scooper, including me, was all-in on Shaka, but he has done zippo at Texas. Majerus, seen as pretty much a sure thing, was an epic failure at Marquette (for a variety of reasons).

Not a single Scooper knows if the next hire will automatically do better than Wojo. We all have opinions. Like you, I like to think we could find someone better, but it always comes back to my two favorite words in any of these situations:

We'll see.

Until any of this happens, though, I'm rooting like hell for Wojo to be the coach most of us want him to be: a long-time, successful coach who can guide us into the NCAAs pretty much every year, can win multiple Big East titles and can get us into the second weekend (and beyond) more times than not.

Again ...

We'll see.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Silent Verbal on October 19, 2019, 04:10:54 PM
Unless I missed it, and it's certainly possible I did, I don't know as I've seen any Scooper say (or even imply) that nobody could do a better job at MU than Wojo.

What some have said is that if you fire Wojo, you start over, most likely with either a mid-major coach, a P6 assistant or possibly a retread. And if you don't score big with the person who replaces him, you can set the program back a decade.

I'm not arguing that is a reason to avoid firing him if justified. I'm simply saying you'd better know exactly what your intentions are before you go the starting-over route.

There are no sure things. Every single Scooper, including me, was all-in on Shaka, but he has done zippo at Texas. Majerus, seen as pretty much a sure thing, was an epic failure at Marquette (for a variety of reasons).

Not a single Scooper knows if the next hire will automatically do better than Wojo. We all have opinions. Like you, I like to think we could find someone better, but it always comes back to my two favorite words in any of these situations:

We'll see.

Until any of this happens, though, I'm rooting like hell for Wojo to be the coach most of us want him to be: a long-time, successful coach who can guide us into the NCAAs pretty much every year, can win multiple Big East titles and can get us into the second weekend (and beyond) more times than not.

Again ...

We'll see.

When it’s suggested that Wojo be shown the door, there are a couple folks who always say, “And replace him with who?”  This question, to me, implies that the person asking it thinks there are no realistic candidates who might do a better job than Wojo.  But since I can’t recall anyone actually saying those words verbatim, I’ll stop saying it going forward.  I don’t want to get into “There are people on here rooting against the program” territory.

I’ll say this:  If Wojo misses on Davis and Garcia, I believe the number of NCAA Tournament games he wins this season should directly correlate to how long his leash is.  Win one, he gets another year.  Win two, give him two.  Zero, and like Silvio Dante said about Richie Aprile on The Sopranos, “I don’t think we got anything to gain by keeping him around.”
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 19, 2019, 04:25:56 PM
I’m trying to remember the moments he was all-in....

When memory fails, I suggest a search.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 19, 2019, 04:27:39 PM
We are in agreement, Lenny.

Sometimes I get a little snarky, yes, and I do admit it bugs me a little bit when a few posters don't show up after wins or after a recruiting get but can't wait to rip after a loss or a recruiting miss, but  yes, fans are fans.

FWIW -- probably not much -- I have gone from bullish on Wojo to "show me" on Wojo. I was generally pleased with the trajectory of the program and the quality of the recruits he was bringing in, and I still am to a degree. However, while I don't absolve the Hausers for Hausershima, he is the coach and the buck stops there. It was a total shyteshow, and it reflects on the coach. So probably for the first time since he's been our coach, in my eyes, the pressure is on Wojo.

I said "probably not much" because there is no "or else" for me, either real or implied. And frankly, I doubt he would be fired unless we have a total dumpster fire of a season ... and who knows, maybe not even then.

So while I personally want to see him take the next step with our program and overcome the fallout of Hausershima, I am pretty realistic.

Go Marquette!

Thanks, Mike.

Go MU!
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 07:11:06 PM
Well, I named two guys I think would be viable candidates, who might accept the job at the right price.  If Thad Matta is able to coach again, he might also be interested and a good choice.  I’m sure other Scoopers can name more guys they’d like to see who aren’t Tony Bennett, Kelvin Sampson, and Chris Beard.  This idea that nobody could do a better job at Marquette than Wojo’s doing is wrongheaded.

There is always someone, somewhere that can do a better job.  Then you have to factor in how they are doing it, are they here for a sip of coffee, or long term, etc. 

Or more importantly, would they come here in the first place.

Imagine a scenario where Wojo wins a few NCAA games next few years and leaves, then kills it at his next stop, same type of players, same system, but catches a few breaks, is a bit wiser having done the gig longer...meanwhile his replacement shats the bed.

Guess what, that is also something that can happen and isn’t wrongheaded.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 07:13:12 PM
When memory fails, I suggest a search.

Oh I have...and the data isn’t supportive. 

And when you say through mid February when exactly did it start, because it doesn’t appear you were all in from the start and certainly not now, maybe you help some of us when it started to shorten the window.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 07:14:54 PM
When it’s suggested that Wojo be shown the door, there are a couple folks who always say, “And replace him with who?”  This question, to me, implies that the person asking it thinks there are no realistic candidates who might do a better job than Wojo.  But since I can’t recall anyone actually saying those words verbatim, I’ll stop saying it going forward.  I don’t want to get into “There are people on here rooting against the program” territory.

I’ll say this:  If Wojo misses on Davis and Garcia, I believe the number of NCAA Tournament games he wins this season should directly correlate to how long his leash is.  Win one, he gets another year.  Win two, give him two.  Zero, and like Silvio Dante said about Richie Aprile on The Sopranos, “I don’t think we got anything to gain by keeping him around.”

Uhm, no.  When we say who are you going to replace him with doesn’t at all mean he is the best person out there.  It is an honest question of who, how, what kind of coach.  You don’t just get to go to the coaching store and select one off the shelf.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: wadesworld on October 19, 2019, 07:18:39 PM
Nobody has said there’s not a single person in the world who would come to Marquette who could do a better job than Wojo. The issue is finding that person. There is no sure fire, can’t miss guy out there, in my opinion. A guy like Nate Oates isn’t going to leave the big pay day he just got after 1 season to take over for a guy who will probably have just made back to back NCAA Tournament appearances and got run out of the building. Nor is Nate Oates clearly a guy who would kill it at Marquette. He had a nice final 2 years at Buffalo, with some guys who were holdovers from the previous coach. Shaka was much closer to a “can’t miss, will kill it at the next level” and he can’t get it done at Texas, which should be easier to win at than Marquette.

I am confident a guy like Tony Bennett would kill it at Marquette. I’m also confident Tony Bennett would never even have his administrative assistant send a phone call from Marquette through to him.

Chris Beard got the Texas Tech job after a single season of coaching D1 college basketball. It has obviously worked out for them. But it was just as likely that it’d turn out to be a failure. That’s the kind of guy we could get at Marquette.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole on October 19, 2019, 07:22:52 PM
Not thinking you can do better is never a reason to keep an employee who isn't getting it done.  This is a big year for Wojo.  I have no doubt that he will get another year after this one regardless, but the year after next is no guaranty.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Lennys Tap on October 19, 2019, 08:57:35 PM
Nobody has said there’s not a single person in the world who would come to Marquette who could do a better job than Wojo. The issue is finding that person. There is no sure fire, can’t miss guy out there, in my opinion. A guy like Nate Oates isn’t going to leave the big pay day he just got after 1 season to take over for a guy who will probably have just made back to back NCAA Tournament appearances and got run out of the building. Nor is Nate Oates clearly a guy who would kill it at Marquette. He had a nice final 2 years at Buffalo, with some guys who were holdovers from the previous coach. Shaka was much closer to a “can’t miss, will kill it at the next level” and he can’t get it done at Texas, which should be easier to win at than Marquette.

I am confident a guy like Tony Bennett would kill it at Marquette. I’m also confident Tony Bennett would never even have his administrative assistant send a phone call from Marquette through to him.

Chris Beard got the Texas Tech job after a single season of coaching D1 college basketball. It has obviously worked out for them. But it was just as likely that it’d turn out to be a failure. That’s the kind of guy we could get at Marquette.

Agree 100%. We struck silver with Crean and gold with Buzz but there are no guarantees. That said, IF it's determined that Wojo's not the guy the sooner you gamble on the next guy you think might be the better.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Cheeks on October 19, 2019, 09:23:52 PM
Agree 100%. We struck silver with Crean and gold with Buzz but there are no guarantees. That said, IF it's determined that Wojo's not the guy the sooner you gamble on the next guy you think might be the better.

Fool’s gold...
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: StillAWarrior on October 20, 2019, 11:34:57 AM
FWIW -- probably not much -- I have gone from bullish on Wojo to "show me" on Wojo.

Go Marquette!

This pretty accurately sums up my feelings.  I do admit to still having a touch of optimism.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: MU82 on October 20, 2019, 12:04:29 PM
Nobody has said there’s not a single person in the world who would come to Marquette who could do a better job than Wojo. The issue is finding that person. There is no sure fire, can’t miss guy out there, in my opinion. A guy like Nate Oates isn’t going to leave the big pay day he just got after 1 season to take over for a guy who will probably have just made back to back NCAA Tournament appearances and got run out of the building. Nor is Nate Oates clearly a guy who would kill it at Marquette. He had a nice final 2 years at Buffalo, with some guys who were holdovers from the previous coach. Shaka was much closer to a “can’t miss, will kill it at the next level” and he can’t get it done at Texas, which should be easier to win at than Marquette.

I am confident a guy like Tony Bennett would kill it at Marquette. I’m also confident Tony Bennett would never even have his administrative assistant send a phone call from Marquette through to him.

Chris Beard got the Texas Tech job after a single season of coaching D1 college basketball. It has obviously worked out for them. But it was just as likely that it’d turn out to be a failure. That’s the kind of guy we could get at Marquette.

Superbly stated, wades, and I think this represents the way most who agree with you would answer Silent Verbal's post.

When it’s suggested that Wojo be shown the door, there are a couple folks who always say, “And replace him with who?”  This question, to me, implies that the person asking it thinks there are no realistic candidates who might do a better job than Wojo.  But since I can’t recall anyone actually saying those words verbatim, I’ll stop saying it going forward.  I don’t want to get into “There are people on here rooting against the program” territory.

I’ll say this:  If Wojo misses on Davis and Garcia, I believe the number of NCAA Tournament games he wins this season should directly correlate to how long his leash is.  Win one, he gets another year.  Win two, give him two.  Zero, and like Silvio Dante said about Richie Aprile on The Sopranos, “I don’t think we got anything to gain by keeping him around.”

Re the first paragraph, see wades' post.

Re the second, that's silliness because it's not based in the reality of how MU administration is thinking. You might think that way, and other Scoopers might agree, but so what? Quite a few Scoopers felt he should have been fired two years ago, and many others thought he should have been fired after last season, but again ... so what?
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: Benny B on October 21, 2019, 09:51:45 AM
I started the NM thread.   IIRC, it was originally a snarky dig at Crean that I regretted shortly after posting.   I wanted to delete it, but instead deleted my post and changed the title to NM.   The rest, as they say.....

Funny... as I recall, it was ramblings of a bromance.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: tower912 on October 21, 2019, 11:39:34 AM
Funny... as I recall, it was ramblings of a bromance.
It had been so long, I had forgotten (a) your work of fan fiction and (b) why I started the damn thing in the first place.   For the life of me, I cannot remember Boeheim's snarky comment about Crean in 2017.
Title: Re: Malaise
Post by: NorthernDancerColt on October 21, 2019, 12:21:17 PM
Yeah anyone could bug There's a huge difference between guiding Depaul to zero NCAA tournament wins in five seasons vs what Wojo has done

Exactly.

While I think we get spanked by Murray St even with our guys all on the same page...
There is little debating that Marquette Basketball was a petty insurrection away from an outright BigEast title.

That is sad.

To claim MU is DePaul equates to either messageBoard stupidity or messageBoard grand larceny.