collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by MU82
[Today at 08:59:26 AM]


Welcome Jack Anderson! by Uncle Rico
[Today at 08:28:54 AM]


2024 Transfer Portal by tower912
[Today at 07:24:03 AM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Herman Cain
[Today at 05:37:28 AM]


Shaka interview by Scoop Snoop
[May 01, 2024, 04:53:31 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by tower912
[May 01, 2024, 02:25:05 PM]


Does Bucky NOT have a Basketball NIL? by MU82
[May 01, 2024, 02:17:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Bubble Watch 2018  (Read 244113 times)

injuryBug

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1700 on: March 10, 2018, 10:31:11 AM »
RPI is flawed in that it really helps the mid major look a lot better than they are.


OK St has bad numbers but they are a team that looks like a tournament team

LoudMouth

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1701 on: March 10, 2018, 10:31:53 AM »
So if we don't see Arizona State and Baylor' s name early in the broadcast, we have a pretty good chance?
Great point! What are the teams we need to get bypassed for us to be getting more excited towards the “M” section....alphabeticaly please  :)

auburnmarquette

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
    • Value Add Explaination
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1702 on: March 10, 2018, 10:42:19 AM »
It was Halls drop. I’ve said it before...I don’t think the quadrants are that concrete. I hope committee is intelligent enough to evaluate wins separately and not vastly change their analysis based on 5-10 point swings in RPI. Per the committee chair, the quadrants were just released to provide more clarity to the general public as to what the committee values. No actual criteria has changed.

That said, I am not feeling great. I think there is a chance that we are one of the surprise teams they include, but I wouldn’t bet on it. I think this team deserves one of the last few bids, but this season, there are going to be 5-7 worthy teams playing in the NIT. That usually isn’t the case.

We will know in 36 hours.

Agree with you and selection chair (from Creighton) said as much - these are categories to start the conversation.

So the Creighton wins will be viewed as almost quad 1. The problem is the flip side - the quad 1 wins we have are not going to be as strong as some other teams quad 1 wins because we didn't beat any high quad 1 teams. That's where last year's team had an edge - they beat Nova. We showed we could beat teams in the high quad 2 to low quad 1. Does that hold up against a team with less quad 1 wins but a top 10 victory?

I believe our away from home record is the biggest trump card - but 4 quad 1 wins and maybe a road win over big east tournament champ if Nova cools off tonight would be nice.
http://www.pudnersports.com/ for my blogs or articles and www.valueaddbasketball.com for for current and historic rankings.

MUBigDance

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 917
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1703 on: March 10, 2018, 10:43:30 AM »
So if we don't see Arizona State and Baylor' s name early in the broadcast, we have a pretty good chance?

Speaking of the broadcast, does anyone know the nitty gritty mechanics of it? I know they will announce the 68 teams first but will they be alphabetical...or by seed...will they announce the first 20 and go to commercial? Etc... I know the matchups come last..,but curious how we will be fed the info.

Also if it’s by seed do you think they save the Dayton teams for the end of the first set? I wonder if they get to the 13s without MU weather I should feel dread.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1704 on: March 10, 2018, 10:46:10 AM »
Speaking of the broadcast, does anyone know the nitty gritty mechanics of it? I know they will announce the 68 teams first but will they be alphabetical...or by seed...will they announce the first 20 and go to commercial? Etc... I know the matchups come last..,but curious how we will be fed the info.

Also if it’s by seed do you think they save the Dayton teams for the end of the first set? I wonder if they get to the 13s without MU weather I should feel dread.

Alphabetical is what I read.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4591
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1705 on: March 10, 2018, 10:51:06 AM »
Great point! What are the teams we need to get bypassed for us to be getting more excited towards the “M” section....alphabeticaly please  :)

Louisville. I think they will do automatic and then at large. Each alphabetically.

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4371
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1706 on: March 10, 2018, 10:54:58 AM »
Kansas St
Kentucky (unless they win SEC)
Louisville (bubble)
Marquette (bubble)
Miami

fjm

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3166
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1707 on: March 10, 2018, 11:08:54 AM »
Kansas St
Kentucky (unless they win SEC)
Louisville (bubble)
Marquette (bubble)
Miami

I'm assuming you're listing this as how it would come up during the announcement tomorrow correct?

auburnmarquette

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
    • Value Add Explaination
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1708 on: March 10, 2018, 11:20:39 AM »
I'm assuming you're listing this as how it would come up during the announcement tomorrow correct?

Yes, but if they skip Louisville and go straight to Marquette I'd be thrilled :-)

With Alabama moving ahead of us, Palm has us playing St. Mary's in Dayton.

If that happened it would make the second straight year Marquette faced the top www.valueaddbasketball.com player in their first game (I had Thornwell from South Carolina first last year), though I believe no. 2 ayton of Arizona likely passed landale after the double and triple teams shut landale down in St Mary's tournament.
http://www.pudnersports.com/ for my blogs or articles and www.valueaddbasketball.com for for current and historic rankings.

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1709 on: March 10, 2018, 11:28:17 AM »
It sucks that they are doing it alphabetically because there aren't many bubble teams that are alphabetically before MU..Baylor and Louisville I guess which wont really tell us anything..I'm more interested in teams like St Marys, Oklahoma, and Middle Tenn St. Now that would tell us something..but of course they are all alphabetically after MU.
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

Otule's Glass Eye

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1710 on: March 10, 2018, 11:37:10 AM »
Not sure if it really helps, but if Vermont pulls off this win they’re in the tourney and that gives us another win over a tournament team. Not sure how important number of wins over tournament teams is.

fjm

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3166
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1711 on: March 10, 2018, 11:55:39 AM »
Dance card has updated today. Has us in by 3 spots with a 100% rating for the last 10 NCAA tourneys.

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

Babybluejeans

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1712 on: March 10, 2018, 12:00:22 PM »
So assuming Alabama is a lock and there are no more bid thieves, we're competing with Baylor, Louisville, Syracuse, St Marys, Oklahoma, and Middle Tenn St.? And for how many spots?

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1713 on: March 10, 2018, 12:02:32 PM »
Vermont blows
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

#UnleashSean

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3553
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1714 on: March 10, 2018, 12:04:45 PM »
That Vermont lose hurts right?

Silkk the Shaka

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5377
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1715 on: March 10, 2018, 12:07:17 PM »
Dance card has updated today. Has us in by 3 spots with a 100% rating for the last 10 NCAA tourneys.

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

I like it, but Syracuse & Louisville are also at 99%+, so at least a couple teams with historically good resumes will be left out. Also, not sure how much this caveat/disclaimer matters:

"The RPI ranks are from the old RPI formula, in which wins on the road and losses at home are weighted equally. This is the version of the RPI used in the Dance Card's development, and the version used to generate the predictions in all past years."

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5858
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1716 on: March 10, 2018, 12:08:36 PM »
Hurts our RPI a bit but they are still safely inside q2 range

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1717 on: March 10, 2018, 12:08:47 PM »
That Vermont lose hurts right?

Not really
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

RideMyBuycks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 522
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1718 on: March 10, 2018, 12:09:47 PM »
Not really

Widely accepted they’re not being considered for an at-large I believe

GooooMarquette

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9489
  • We got this.
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1719 on: March 10, 2018, 12:15:18 PM »
Dance card has updated today. Has us in by 3 spots with a 100% rating for the last 10 NCAA tourneys.

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

Can't recall anyone else thinking we have a (slightly) better shot than Creighton.  Most seem to list CU as an 8 or 9, and MU right on the edge.

#UnleashSean

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3553
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1720 on: March 10, 2018, 12:25:54 PM »
Dance card has updated today. Has us in by 3 spots with a 100% rating for the last 10 NCAA tourneys.

http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

They've only had like 9 incorrect picks in the last 6 years. Looks good for mu.

WarriorDad

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1721 on: March 10, 2018, 12:35:15 PM »


Gotta weight 5 years ta no, hey?

Tony Bennett at Virginia

Year 1 No NCAA
Year 2 No NAA
Year 3 NCAA, first round loss
Year 4 NIT


Conversely, Kevin Ollie

Year one  Post Season Inelibile
Year two  NCAA champions
Year three NIT
Year four  NCAA
Year five  No NCAA
Year six  No NCAA fired
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”
— Plato

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2674
  • Retire #34
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1722 on: March 10, 2018, 12:37:18 PM »
two bid stealers playing today in the A10. URI and St. Bonaventure are locks.
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5858
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1723 on: March 10, 2018, 12:41:16 PM »
two bid stealers playing today in the A10. URI and St. Bonaventure are locks.

And Memphis in the AAC. I think that's it for potential bid stealers. I suppose you could say USC in the Pac 12 but I'd imagine they are in regardless now

wisblue

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1387
Re: Bubble Watch 2018
« Reply #1724 on: March 10, 2018, 12:43:13 PM »
Speaking of the broadcast, does anyone know the nitty gritty mechanics of it? I know they will announce the 68 teams first but will they be alphabetical...or by seed...will they announce the first 20 and go to commercial? Etc... I know the matchups come last..,but curious how we will be fed the info.

Also if it’s by seed do you think they save the Dayton teams for the end of the first set? I wonder if they get to the 13s without MU weather I should feel dread.

What I saw is that they will first list the 32 automatic bids, alphabetically by conference. Obviously no surprises there for people who have been paying attention. Then they will announce the 36 at large teams alphabetically. They said the 68 teams would be revealed in the first 10 minutes, so they shouldn't have too many breaks before that.

My personal bubble list has 9 teams playing for 2 spots. Those 2 spots could disappear if there are bid thieves in the A10 and AAC. So, I'm rooting for Rhode Island, St. Bonaventure, and Cincinnati today.

My 9 bubble teams listed alphabetically are Arizona State, Baylor, Louisville, Marquette, Middle Tennessee, Notre Dame, Oklahoma State, St. Mary's, and Syracuse.

So hearing either Arizona State or Baylor would be bad, and hearing both might be fatal. If Kentucky doesn't win the SEC I think that might be the last team before Louisville (which I don't want to hear. If you hear Miami and not Marquette it's time to wait for the NIT pairings.

 

feedback