Scholarship table
You're the king, bro. You got me. Totally convinced now!
It’s a simple question and a chance to save the planet....why wouldn’t they want to put it to bed and release the model methodology and the data. So selfish those planet savers...don’t you think?
I don’t know but I would think the same argument applies to releasing tax returns.
climate change is the biggest money laundering scam out there. when a group of people can be so wrong so many times and still have credibility is a fool me twice many times over. according to the "experts" manhattan should be under water but according to some real estate records, martha's vineyard is safe. eyn'a? just ask #44oh, and some of the biggest alarmists will not give up their private jets? say it ain't so...where is the loveoh, and buy tesla but put a better alarm on it
Who’s getting rich on climate change??? This idea that there all these environmental scientists getting rich on this is funny. Yet no one mentions the people clearly getting rich through denying it. Weird.
I see uncle bloody eye wants to eliminate all fossil fuels.
Gregg Allman loved CC Sabathia?
Couldn't you find someone in a wheelchair to make fun of? Seems like that is your style.
Canada weather getting chilly about now?
I haven't read through the entire thread here but, addressing your comment, I would agree that scientists aren't necessarily getting rich on climate change. However, there is an entire cottage industry in academia geared to pumping out empiricism to support positions on both sides.I was invited by the DOE to present recently at an global energy conference on hydrogen fuel systems and during the Q&A was challenged by an academic (from UW Madison, no less!) on the use of CH4 as a base fuel for power generation. His view is the burning any complex hydrocarbon is bad. I asked if he flew or walked to the conference and if he walked from the airport.The degree of hypocrisy among academics on global warming is staggering. And what was amazing is that when I spoke to this guy about EGR systems and how hydrogen is actually produced it was clear he had no real intelligence on the subject. Instead, he resorted to spewing doom and gloom sound bites.Human use of complex hydrocarbons has had an impact on climate but it is grossly overstated by many. And ask them if they are willing to sacrifice the advanced post-industrial lifestyle that is entirely the result of man harnessing the energy in hydrocarbons and the hypocrisy is illuminated. A little more than 100 years ago the entirety of humankind was limited by the productive power of the horse. The advances in lifestyle, productivity, and scientific accomplishment since then is staggering. One of my Brit colleagues looked up this guy's background and, of course, he has zero training in the sciences or engineering. He is some sort of "policy expert" who has made a living out of trying to scare people on science he does not understand. To suggest that there isn't an industry built around academic research into global warming is naive.
I'll stick with my opinion on Gold. He'll be in foul trouble within the first eight minutes.
Like you, I haven't read this entire thread but regarding the bolded, why would these ideas be mutually exclusive? Isn't the goal of many scientists to reduce the carbon footprint without compromising the luxuries that we are able to enjoy today because of hydrocarbons?
yes, and the global warming alarmists paying the "scientists" trying to find a (horse hockey)solution to justify not giving up their private jets, mega homes, SUV's etc.
Thanks for this response. I don’t disagree with a lot of what you are saying. However I think there are a ton of people who are clearly ignorant of the people clearly getting rich off climate denial. It’s not too hard to draw that line.