You bring up their race...for what reason, exactly?

was I wrong?  if it were reversed, 82 and jock breath would have started separate threads

You actually touch on what is going to be an interesting legal and philosophical
argument going forward.   Can felons own guns?  Because a couple thousand gun lovers have felony convictions now.    In the recently mentioned cases,  Charlotte and Elkhorn, felons who had served their sentences returned to society and illegally obtained guns with tragic consequences.   
   Should the convicted felons of January 6 be allowed to own weapons?   Before you answer, should the recent Israel/Palestine protesters who will be convicted of felonies related to destruction of property and assault be forever banned from firearm ownership?
   I am in the camp of a blanket ban.

the Elkhorn dude was freed early by big tony evers.  anyone responsible for freeing anyone from a sentence early or paroling or letting them bail out should be held responsible for that person going out and killing someone.

 if a doctor causes harm on a patient, they are held responsible and rightly so.  so should judges and anyone else associated with releasing a felon.

Kinda crazy that the House of Representatives - in a total bipartisan vote - just made it illegal to speak poorly of a foreign government.

For sure, nothing you said here is out of bounds and no doubt a buyback can be a way for management to print money for themselves in a way.  I just don't subscribe to the notion that shareholders and "large shareholders" need to be separate in any way to make it look any worse.

We'll agree to agree with your first sentence and agree to disagree with your second.

You don’t understand the brilliant gambits of Elon

"Let's see ... who buys EVs? Woke tree-huggers! So ... who should I pizz off so much that they won't want to buy my EVs? Woke tree-huggers! No wonder everybody calls me a genius!"