Scholarship table
For sure. Let's just pass this crap one thing at a time and not cram everything into one big turd sandwich that becomes impossible for anyone to chew.
So what stocks are a good buy right now?
No that’s the whole point. It’s stuff wholly unrelated to and unnecessary to the the bill and situation at hand. It’s standing in front of a burning house and withholding water until the family switches to electric cars, vegetarian diets, and a more robust annual charitable donation allotment. All are valid topics to discuss and deserve consideration, but not to the impediment of the situation at hand. Maybe pork wasn’t the right word, I should have said sweeteners
Ordinarily, you'd be right Hards. To do as Pelosi and Schumer are doing is normal politics in a normal time. But "this is the kind of normal politics you would hope would not occur in an abnormal time like this."Pass the bill as it relates to coronavirus relief. Then go back and start another bill and add whatever the F they want to add and see if it flies. But Wags's analogy to a burning house is spot on.Oh, and IBTL.
Thanks for the info. My son and his wife are in the early stages of looking for their first house and this is good to know.I hope things work out great for you.
Regrettably (and predictably), both sides are playing politics. The bill should not contain anything that isn't directly related to directly helping PEOPLE through the immediate crisis. Any provision to help PBS or NASA (like the Democrats want) should be taken out and dealt with later. And likewise, any provision that provides help to corporations or gives broad discretion to Mnuchin (like the Republicans want) should also be taken out and dealt with later. Things on both sides of the aisle have some merit and are at least worth discussing, but are NOT as urgent as getting help to individual PEOPLE.Both sides look really bad, and meanwhile, the people suffer.
No, at this point in time, I'm still right. Pass the parts of the bill one at a time, and get things moving. Keep the pet projects from both sides out. You can blame Pelosi and Shumer, but that only shows me your colors, and that you are not trying to argue in good faith.
Then I misunderstood your point because I agree with you. Keep the pet projects from both sides out. The point is to keep this bill related to coronavirus. With regard to issues in the bill that the right has included that have nothing to do stimulating the economy as it relates to Covid-19, they should be removed as well. So rather than the left trying to include a bunch of extraneous issues into this bill, strip out the issues in the current bill that are unrelated and only add or improve on as it relates to problems caused by Covid-19. Save the union funding and obamaphones for another bill. And don't give Mnuchin carte blanche either.
Thanks for the kind words. I have a lender I'd recommend if they are in Illinois.
So...no talk of the Fed buying (bond) ETFs? Maybe I missed the discussion.https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-is-going-to-buy-etfs-what-does-it-mean-2020-03-23To me - clearly the reason the market is rocketing today. But once people realize that 1.3 billion people in India being locked down for 21 days isn't good for anybody's economy, it'll drop big time again.
This is probably too political of a comment...But it would help if they'd all quit acting like unnatural carnal knowledgeing children
Both sides. Damn embarrassing. What does funding for the JFK center or solar panels have to do with this emergency? People should be leery of how the money is spent and safeguards, but also badly played to ram other options into this. Bad look all around.
I can't help but notice that you forgot to mention the $500 billion slush fund along side the solar panels and JFK center funding.How convenient. And right after you said both sides. I am shocked. Really. To my core.
Galway, BA up 33% in two days. Keep it rolling hopefully. I doubled down on OXY today.
Saw that, I'm scared to get my hopes up