collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by brewcity77
[Today at 01:39:16 PM]


Bill Scholl Retiring by MU1980
[Today at 01:26:28 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by DFW HOYA
[Today at 10:45:35 AM]


MU appearance in The Athletic's college hoops mailbag by zcg2013
[Today at 08:59:21 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Skatastrophy
[May 07, 2024, 07:21:58 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by Dawson Rental
[May 07, 2024, 06:51:10 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: 15 Teams for 10 Spots  (Read 5153 times)

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22178
  • Meat Eater certified
15 Teams for 10 Spots
« on: March 02, 2017, 12:52:34 PM »
Yesterday, I made a post called 17 teams for 12 spots. With Northwestern beating Michigan with a full court Hail Mary, they have now eliminated any chance that they play themselves off the bubble. As a reminder, red games are ones that don't help much if you win but hurt a lot if you lose. Green games are ones that raise your profile if you win but don't hurt much if you lose.

Arkansas:UGA
Xavier: @DPL
USC: WASH
Seton Hall: @BUT
Providence: @SJU
Middle Tennessee State: FIU, FAU
Syracuse: GT
California: @UTAH, @COLO
Illinois State: N/A
Rhode Island: DAV
Current Cut Off
Vanderbilt: FLA
Wake Forest: @VT
Illinois: @RUT
Kansas State: TTU
Houston: @Cincy, ECU

With only 1 green game remaining on each of their schedules, Marquette and Northwestern move off the bubble. Quite simply, they have no more opportunities to play themselves off the bubble. Teams behind them would have to win significant games to move ahead of them. Kansas State and Illinois have run out of opportunities. There is no situation outside them winning huge games in their conference tournaments where they could finish ahead of Marquette and Northwestern. That leaves only Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, and Houston as potential upstarts. But teams like Rhode Island, Illinois State, and Middle Tennessee State would get bumped before either of them.

Seton Hall stays on, despite only having one green game left. Unless I have the tiebreaker wrong, they could still end up in the 7th place game against Depaul. A loss there would jeopardize their NCAA hopes.

This exercise doesn't take into account bid stealers and the human element of the committee. They could come out of left field and make unexpected decisions. But on paper, Marquette has locked up its first NCAA appearance in the Wojo Era.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2017, 01:00:04 PM »
I just don't see us as that safe.


But hopefully I'm wrong

And even more so, hopefully it doesn't need to be proven because we smash Creighton in two days
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2017, 01:02:31 PM »
Great analysis.  Completely agreed.  I am working on something to determine what the bubble may look like in a nightmare scenario of bids being stolen left and right next week. Will be interesting to see what it looks like.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Windyplayer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2746
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2017, 01:17:01 PM »
I just don't see us as that safe.


But hopefully I'm wrong

And even more so, hopefully it doesn't need to be proven because we smash Creighton in two days
You are wrong. Accept it. Your team is in the tourney. Kill the drama.

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2017, 01:18:41 PM »
You are wrong. Accept it. Your team is in the tourney. Kill the drama.

When teamrankings has you at 54% there's a lot to still accept.

Plus, I want to avoid Dayton.

Need to beat Creighton. Accept that.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Windyplayer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2746
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2017, 01:23:24 PM »
When teamrankings has you at 54% there's a lot to still accept.

Plus, I want to avoid Dayton.

Need to beat Creighton. Accept that.
(1) Teamrankings sounds like a neat start-up, (2) avoiding Dayton is not the same as missing out on the Dance altogether, (3) a "need" to ensure we're not in Dayton? If so, accepted.

MarquetteDano

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3233
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2017, 01:51:31 PM »
I just don't see us as that safe.


But hopefully I'm wrong

And even more so, hopefully it doesn't need to be proven because we smash Creighton in two days

Per your streak,  can't you just make a Prop Bet in Vegas that Marquette does NOT make the tourney?  Then we will be sure fire locks?

frozena pizza

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2017, 01:51:53 PM »
"This exercise doesn't take into account bid stealers and the human element of the committee."

Those are some pretty important variables.  Saturday is not an easy game.  We have very little margin for error currently that will be razor thin if we lose.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2017, 01:54:31 PM »
"This exercise doesn't take into account bid stealers and the human element of the committee."

Those are some pretty important variables.  Saturday is not an easy game. We have very little margin for error currently that will be razor thin if we lose.

We actually have a pretty significant margin for error at this point.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12906
  • 9-9-9
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2017, 01:59:19 PM »
Yesterday, I made a post called 17 teams for 12 spots. With Northwestern beating Michigan with a full court Hail Mary, they have now eliminated any chance that they play themselves off the bubble. As a reminder, red games are ones that don't help much if you win but hurt a lot if you lose. Green games are ones that raise your profile if you win but don't hurt much if you lose.

Arkansas:UGA
Xavier: @DPL
USC: WASH
Seton Hall: @BUT
Providence: @SJU
Middle Tennessee State: FIU, FAU
Syracuse: GT
California: @UTAH, @COLO
Illinois State: N/A
Rhode Island: DAV
Current Cut Off
Vanderbilt: FLA
Wake Forest: @VT
Illinois: @RUT
Kansas State: TTU
Houston: @Cincy, ECU

With only 1 green game remaining on each of their schedules, Marquette and Northwestern move off the bubble. Quite simply, they have no more opportunities to play themselves off the bubble. Teams behind them would have to win significant games to move ahead of them. Kansas State and Illinois have run out of opportunities. There is no situation outside them winning huge games in their conference tournaments where they could finish ahead of Marquette and Northwestern. That leaves only Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, and Houston as potential upstarts. But teams like Rhode Island, Illinois State, and Middle Tennessee State would get bumped before either of them.

Seton Hall stays on, despite only having one green game left. Unless I have the tiebreaker wrong, they could still end up in the 7th place game against Depaul. A loss there would jeopardize their NCAA hopes.

This exercise doesn't take into account bid stealers and the human element of the committee. They could come out of left field and make unexpected decisions. But on paper, Marquette has locked up its first NCAA appearance in the Wojo Era.
Clearly we want Buzz and  Company to beat Wake Forest.....
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

frozena pizza

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2017, 02:01:36 PM »
We actually have a pretty significant margin for error at this point.

So if we lose Saturday and don't win a game in the BET and there are 3-4 bid stealers, are we a lock?  Because that could happen.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2017, 02:08:15 PM »
So if we lose Saturday and don't win a game in the BET and there are 3-4 bid stealers, are we a lock?  Because that could happen.

We may be in Dayton in that scenario, but I think we're still in.

Most likely going to take 7 or 8 bid stealers, and some other crazy results to push us out with an 0-2 finish. It is incredibly unlikely.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

mikekinsellaMVP

  • Registered User
  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2017, 02:16:57 PM »
Seton Hall stays on, despite only having one green game left. Unless I have the tiebreaker wrong, they could still end up in the 7th place game against Depaul. A loss there would jeopardize their NCAA hopes.

I believe Xavier is locked in to the 7-seed.  Of the 3 teams 1 game ahead of them, they split with 2 of them (Hall, Providence) and were swept by the other (MU).  They would have the worst record in any mini-conference and would lose any two way tie procedure (swept by MU, and MU would serve as the best win tiebreaker for both Hall and Providence.)

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2017, 02:20:07 PM »
Per your streak,  can't you just make a Prop Bet in Vegas that Marquette does NOT make the tourney?  Then we will be sure fire locks?

Lol good point.

But considering I'm on the lock train with a Creighton W.

Might as well only waste money once!
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Mr. Sand-Knit

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3533
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2017, 04:46:35 PM »
I agree with the green n red games.  Howver this all assumes these teams are below us.  This is a huge assumption and i could very easily seeing a vast majority of these teams somehow being ahead of us in the commitees eyes. 

Creighton would clinch it tho
Political free board, plz leave your clever quips in your clever mind.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22178
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2017, 04:51:50 PM »
So if we lose Saturday and don't win a game in the BET and there are 3-4 bid stealers, are we a lock?  Because that could happen.

There are 7 teams currently between us and the bubble. Even if there are 4 bid stealers (crazy high), four teams behind us would have to pass us. A loss to Creighton doesn't hurt us. By my estimate, there are 6 teams with enough meat on their schedule to pass us. So yes, theoretically we could be left out. But it would require a lot to go wrong.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Mr. Sand-Knit

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3533
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2017, 05:00:15 PM »
There are 7 teams currently between us and the bubble. Even if there are 4 bid stealers (crazy high), four teams behind us would have to pass us. A loss to Creighton doesn't hurt us. By my estimate, there are 6 teams with enough meat on their schedule to pass us. So yes, theoretically we could be left out. But it would require a lot to go wrong.

You have no idea where we stand, it is not published, there is no true metric.  I wish there was , there isnt
Political free board, plz leave your clever quips in your clever mind.

Mr. Sand-Knit

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3533
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2017, 05:02:50 PM »
A long time ago say a 20 year ago, i noticed a trend that said top 60 rpi and 20 wins, like 1 high major had ever missed the dance.  Recently, its gone to 68 n the rpi is supposedly less used.  Then again we dont have 20 wins.
Political free board, plz leave your clever quips in your clever mind.

GWSwarrior

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2017, 05:23:30 PM »
There are 7 teams currently between us and the bubble. Even if there are 4 bid stealers (crazy high), four teams behind us would have to pass us. A loss to Creighton doesn't hurt us. By my estimate, there are 6 teams with enough meat on their schedule to pass us. So yes, theoretically we could be left out. But it would require a lot to go wrong.

Does UNC-Ashville still it make after the lose to Campbell?  I would guess no but will defer to the "experts", EDIT i'm a moron sorry, not even leading their conf. i'm gonna go sit in the corner and think about my actions
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 05:25:18 PM by GWSwarrior »
Fear makes you dumb.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12906
  • 9-9-9
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2017, 05:35:40 PM »
Does UNC-Ashville still it make after the lose to Campbell?  I would guess no but will defer to the "experts", EDIT i'm a moron sorry, not even leading their conf. i'm gonna go sit in the corner and think about my actions
In other Big South news, Liberty was stunned by Radford. Looks. like John Dawson's career over unless he can win his appeal on the 4 minutes he played for us. John had another good season leading the team to a 14-4 record in conference and 19-12 overall.  I was hoping Liberty could have won their conference tournament and made the dance.
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10469
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2017, 05:40:16 PM »
In other Big South news, Liberty was stunned by Radford. Looks. like John Dawson's career over unless he can win his appeal on the 4 minutes he played for us. John had another good season leading the team to a 14-4 record in conference and 19-12 overall.  I was hoping Liberty could have won their conference tournament and made the dance.

And I'm sure all the one fan on that program was thinking all about how he started off his career at marquette
Maigh Eo for Sam

barfolomew

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1598
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #21 on: March 02, 2017, 05:48:03 PM »
Even if there are 4 bid stealers (crazy high), four teams behind us would have to pass us.

So I'm trying to guess at which conferences are most likely to generate a bid-stealer.

CUSA is maybe the best candidate, if MTSU has a bad night.
AAC might be next, if a UConn or a Tulsa ran the table.
Maybe BYU in the West Coast Conf. if the Zags and Gaels stumble.

After that, I'm not sure who likely candidates would be. Maybe someone in the A10 or SEC?
Could St. John's do it playing at home, if the bracket falls their way?


Relationes Incrementum Victoria

IrwinFletcher

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #22 on: March 02, 2017, 05:51:29 PM »
Yesterday, I made a post called 17 teams for 12 spots. With Northwestern beating Michigan with a full court Hail Mary, they have now eliminated any chance that they play themselves off the bubble. As a reminder, red games are ones that don't help much if you win but hurt a lot if you lose. Green games are ones that raise your profile if you win but don't hurt much if you lose.

Arkansas:UGA
Xavier: @DPL
USC: WASH
Seton Hall: @BUT
Providence: @SJU
Middle Tennessee State: FIU, FAU
Syracuse: GT
California: @UTAH, @COLO
Illinois State: N/A
Rhode Island: DAV
Current Cut Off
Vanderbilt: FLA
Wake Forest: @VT
Illinois: @RUT
Kansas State: TTU
Houston: @Cincy, ECU

With only 1 green game remaining on each of their schedules, Marquette and Northwestern move off the bubble. Quite simply, they have no more opportunities to play themselves off the bubble. Teams behind them would have to win significant games to move ahead of them. Kansas State and Illinois have run out of opportunities. There is no situation outside them winning huge games in their conference tournaments where they could finish ahead of Marquette and Northwestern. That leaves only Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, and Houston as potential upstarts. But teams like Rhode Island, Illinois State, and Middle Tennessee State would get bumped before either of them.

Seton Hall stays on, despite only having one green game left. Unless I have the tiebreaker wrong, they could still end up in the 7th place game against Depaul. A loss there would jeopardize their NCAA hopes.

This exercise doesn't take into account bid stealers and the human element of the committee. They could come out of left field and make unexpected decisions. But on paper, Marquette has locked up its first NCAA appearance in the Wojo Era.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

TheGym

  • Registered User
  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #23 on: March 02, 2017, 05:57:17 PM »
(1) Teamrankings sounds like a neat start-up, (2) avoiding Dayton is not the same as missing out on the Dance altogether, (3) a "need" to ensure we're not in Dayton? If so, accepted.

It is true that getting a game in Dayton is "making the dance", but it really does not feel like it as a fan.  Until we get a game on Thurs. or Fri. when all the other games are going on, it does not feel like you made the NCAA tournament.

brandx

  • Guest
Re: 15 Teams for 10 Spots
« Reply #24 on: March 02, 2017, 06:46:20 PM »
I just don't see us as that safe.


But hopefully I'm wrong

And even more so, hopefully it doesn't need to be proven because we smash Creighton in two days

Same here. I am missing something.

We were on the bubble with 3 games to play, but we are a lock if we lose 2 out of those 3. Losing 2 of 3 moves you down, not up.

 

feedback