Oso planning to go pro
looks like the only other 5/5 green game was Robert Morris so I am confused how that can be good things
Jacksonville is a 5/5 green too. And the first 3 games are all 4/5, so those were viewed pretty positively too.But that's what I find to be so interesting is how the coaches view the performance vs. how we the fans view the team's performance. Obviously they are looking for some pretty specific things with this board, and even some of the games that look ugly to fans can still be viewed as largely positive by coaches.
I'll stick with my opinion on Gold. He'll be in foul trouble within the first eight minutes.
Unless the coach has the wrong categories of focus. Robert Morris being 5/5 green is tough to justify, but we won. So I guess.
Of course you have no idea what it measures or how it is used. But don't let that stop your criticism.
I think I can deduce green means good red means bad. We were 5/5 good against Robert Morris Kenpom ranking 295 from the NEC after beating them by 2 scores. Just observing that it's tough to justify 5/5 good in a game with that result.
It may be plenty justified if you knew what it is measuring. But you don't.
The analysis of a blurry board out of focus due to not being the, well, focus of the pic is both why I love and fear MUScoop.
What is your deal, guy? I'm saying 5/5 good is tough to justify given the result against Robert Morris. I'm not the only one to suggest that in this thread either. I'm sure by whatever objective metrics they have they filled out the chart the right way if that's what you think I mean.
Maybe green doesn't mean "good" necessarily, but rather "better than" the opponent. If we have 10 assists and they have 8, that's a green - it doesn't mean 10 assists is a ton, just means we won the assists battle.
1) Scoop Meltdown-O-Meter2) Cuddle Cliche Rating3) Ners Reinstatement Heat Map4) Percent of Cheeks' Personnas Posting in Same Thread5) Proximity Radius of nearest Arby's